Cargando…
EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102804 |
_version_ | 1783545133928546304 |
---|---|
author | Jochumsen, Mads Knoche, Hendrik Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg Dinesen, Birthe Kidmose, Preben |
author_facet | Jochumsen, Mads Knoche, Hendrik Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg Dinesen, Birthe Kidmose, Preben |
author_sort | Jochumsen, Mads |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially available headsets’ ability to record and classify movement intentions (movement-related cortical potentials—MRCPs). Twelve healthy participants performed 100 movements, while continuous EEG was recorded from the headsets on two different days to establish the reliability of the measures: classification accuracies of single-trials, number of rejected epochs, and signal-to-noise ratio. MRCPs could be recorded with the headsets covering the motor cortex, and they obtained the best classification accuracies (73%−77%). The reliability was moderate to good for the best headset (a gel-based headset covering the motor cortex). The results demonstrate that, among the evaluated headsets, reliable recordings of MRCPs require channels located close to the motor cortex and potentially a gel-based headset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7287803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72878032020-06-15 EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces Jochumsen, Mads Knoche, Hendrik Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg Dinesen, Birthe Kidmose, Preben Sensors (Basel) Article Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially available headsets’ ability to record and classify movement intentions (movement-related cortical potentials—MRCPs). Twelve healthy participants performed 100 movements, while continuous EEG was recorded from the headsets on two different days to establish the reliability of the measures: classification accuracies of single-trials, number of rejected epochs, and signal-to-noise ratio. MRCPs could be recorded with the headsets covering the motor cortex, and they obtained the best classification accuracies (73%−77%). The reliability was moderate to good for the best headset (a gel-based headset covering the motor cortex). The results demonstrate that, among the evaluated headsets, reliable recordings of MRCPs require channels located close to the motor cortex and potentially a gel-based headset. MDPI 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7287803/ /pubmed/32423133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102804 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jochumsen, Mads Knoche, Hendrik Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg Dinesen, Birthe Kidmose, Preben EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces |
title | EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces |
title_full | EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces |
title_fullStr | EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces |
title_short | EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces |
title_sort | eeg headset evaluation for detection of single-trial movement intention for brain-computer interfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jochumsenmads eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces AT knochehendrik eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces AT kjaertroelswesenberg eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces AT dinesenbirthe eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces AT kidmosepreben eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces |