Cargando…

EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jochumsen, Mads, Knoche, Hendrik, Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg, Dinesen, Birthe, Kidmose, Preben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102804
_version_ 1783545133928546304
author Jochumsen, Mads
Knoche, Hendrik
Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg
Dinesen, Birthe
Kidmose, Preben
author_facet Jochumsen, Mads
Knoche, Hendrik
Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg
Dinesen, Birthe
Kidmose, Preben
author_sort Jochumsen, Mads
collection PubMed
description Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially available headsets’ ability to record and classify movement intentions (movement-related cortical potentials—MRCPs). Twelve healthy participants performed 100 movements, while continuous EEG was recorded from the headsets on two different days to establish the reliability of the measures: classification accuracies of single-trials, number of rejected epochs, and signal-to-noise ratio. MRCPs could be recorded with the headsets covering the motor cortex, and they obtained the best classification accuracies (73%−77%). The reliability was moderate to good for the best headset (a gel-based headset covering the motor cortex). The results demonstrate that, among the evaluated headsets, reliable recordings of MRCPs require channels located close to the motor cortex and potentially a gel-based headset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7287803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72878032020-06-15 EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces Jochumsen, Mads Knoche, Hendrik Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg Dinesen, Birthe Kidmose, Preben Sensors (Basel) Article Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially available headsets’ ability to record and classify movement intentions (movement-related cortical potentials—MRCPs). Twelve healthy participants performed 100 movements, while continuous EEG was recorded from the headsets on two different days to establish the reliability of the measures: classification accuracies of single-trials, number of rejected epochs, and signal-to-noise ratio. MRCPs could be recorded with the headsets covering the motor cortex, and they obtained the best classification accuracies (73%−77%). The reliability was moderate to good for the best headset (a gel-based headset covering the motor cortex). The results demonstrate that, among the evaluated headsets, reliable recordings of MRCPs require channels located close to the motor cortex and potentially a gel-based headset. MDPI 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7287803/ /pubmed/32423133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102804 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jochumsen, Mads
Knoche, Hendrik
Kjaer, Troels Wesenberg
Dinesen, Birthe
Kidmose, Preben
EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
title EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
title_full EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
title_fullStr EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
title_full_unstemmed EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
title_short EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces
title_sort eeg headset evaluation for detection of single-trial movement intention for brain-computer interfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102804
work_keys_str_mv AT jochumsenmads eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces
AT knochehendrik eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces
AT kjaertroelswesenberg eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces
AT dinesenbirthe eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces
AT kidmosepreben eegheadsetevaluationfordetectionofsingletrialmovementintentionforbraincomputerinterfaces