Cargando…

Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study

Comprehensive and repetitive assessments are needed to detect physical changes in an older population to prevent functional decline at the earliest possible stage and to initiate preventive interventions. Established instruments like the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG) Test and the Sit-to-Stand Test (SST)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fudickar, Sebastian, Hellmers, Sandra, Lau, Sandra, Diekmann, Rebecca, Bauer, Jürgen M., Hein, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102824
_version_ 1783545175861100544
author Fudickar, Sebastian
Hellmers, Sandra
Lau, Sandra
Diekmann, Rebecca
Bauer, Jürgen M.
Hein, Andreas
author_facet Fudickar, Sebastian
Hellmers, Sandra
Lau, Sandra
Diekmann, Rebecca
Bauer, Jürgen M.
Hein, Andreas
author_sort Fudickar, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Comprehensive and repetitive assessments are needed to detect physical changes in an older population to prevent functional decline at the earliest possible stage and to initiate preventive interventions. Established instruments like the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG) Test and the Sit-to-Stand Test (SST) require a trained person (e.g., physiotherapist) to assess physical performance. More often, these tests are only applied to a selected group of persons already functionally impaired and not to those who are at potential risk of functional decline. The article introduces the Unsupervised Screening System (USS) for unsupervised self-assessments by older adults and evaluates its validity for the TUG and SST. The USS included ambient and wearable movement sensors to measure the user’s test performance. Sensor datasets of the USS’s light barriers and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) were analyzed for 91 users aged 73 to 89 years compared to conventional stopwatch measurement. A significant correlation coefficient of 0.89 for the TUG test and of 0.73 for the SST were confirmed among USS’s light barriers. Correspondingly, for the inertial data-based measures, a high and significant correlation of 0.78 for the TUG test and of 0.87 for SST were also found. The USS was a validated and reliable tool to assess TUG and SST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7287989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72879892020-06-15 Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study Fudickar, Sebastian Hellmers, Sandra Lau, Sandra Diekmann, Rebecca Bauer, Jürgen M. Hein, Andreas Sensors (Basel) Article Comprehensive and repetitive assessments are needed to detect physical changes in an older population to prevent functional decline at the earliest possible stage and to initiate preventive interventions. Established instruments like the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG) Test and the Sit-to-Stand Test (SST) require a trained person (e.g., physiotherapist) to assess physical performance. More often, these tests are only applied to a selected group of persons already functionally impaired and not to those who are at potential risk of functional decline. The article introduces the Unsupervised Screening System (USS) for unsupervised self-assessments by older adults and evaluates its validity for the TUG and SST. The USS included ambient and wearable movement sensors to measure the user’s test performance. Sensor datasets of the USS’s light barriers and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) were analyzed for 91 users aged 73 to 89 years compared to conventional stopwatch measurement. A significant correlation coefficient of 0.89 for the TUG test and of 0.73 for the SST were confirmed among USS’s light barriers. Correspondingly, for the inertial data-based measures, a high and significant correlation of 0.78 for the TUG test and of 0.87 for SST were also found. The USS was a validated and reliable tool to assess TUG and SST. MDPI 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7287989/ /pubmed/32429306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102824 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fudickar, Sebastian
Hellmers, Sandra
Lau, Sandra
Diekmann, Rebecca
Bauer, Jürgen M.
Hein, Andreas
Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study
title Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study
title_full Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study
title_fullStr Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study
title_full_unstemmed Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study
title_short Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessment of Timed “Up & Go” and Five Times Sit to Stand Test in the Community—A Validity Study
title_sort measurement system for unsupervised standardized assessment of timed “up & go” and five times sit to stand test in the community—a validity study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102824
work_keys_str_mv AT fudickarsebastian measurementsystemforunsupervisedstandardizedassessmentoftimedupgoandfivetimessittostandtestinthecommunityavaliditystudy
AT hellmerssandra measurementsystemforunsupervisedstandardizedassessmentoftimedupgoandfivetimessittostandtestinthecommunityavaliditystudy
AT lausandra measurementsystemforunsupervisedstandardizedassessmentoftimedupgoandfivetimessittostandtestinthecommunityavaliditystudy
AT diekmannrebecca measurementsystemforunsupervisedstandardizedassessmentoftimedupgoandfivetimessittostandtestinthecommunityavaliditystudy
AT bauerjurgenm measurementsystemforunsupervisedstandardizedassessmentoftimedupgoandfivetimessittostandtestinthecommunityavaliditystudy
AT heinandreas measurementsystemforunsupervisedstandardizedassessmentoftimedupgoandfivetimessittostandtestinthecommunityavaliditystudy