Cargando…

Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb

The development of on-board sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMU), has made it possible to develop new methods for analyzing horse locomotion to detect lameness. The detection of spatiotemporal events is one of the keystones in the analysis of horse locomotion. This study assesses the pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sapone, Marie, Martin, Pauline, Ben Mansour, Khalil, Château, Henry, Marin, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102983
_version_ 1783545228626493440
author Sapone, Marie
Martin, Pauline
Ben Mansour, Khalil
Château, Henry
Marin, Frédéric
author_facet Sapone, Marie
Martin, Pauline
Ben Mansour, Khalil
Château, Henry
Marin, Frédéric
author_sort Sapone, Marie
collection PubMed
description The development of on-board sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMU), has made it possible to develop new methods for analyzing horse locomotion to detect lameness. The detection of spatiotemporal events is one of the keystones in the analysis of horse locomotion. This study assesses the performance of four methods for detecting Foot on and Foot off events. They were developed from an IMU positioned on the canon bone of eight horses during trotting recording on a treadmill and compared to a standard gold method based on motion capture. These methods are based on accelerometer and gyroscope data and use either thresholding or wavelets to detect stride events. The two methods developed from gyroscopic data showed more precision than those developed from accelerometric data with a bias less than 0.6% of stride duration for Foot on and 0.1% of stride duration for Foot off. The gyroscope is less impacted by the different patterns of strides, specific to each horse. To conclude, methods using the gyroscope present the potential of further developments to investigate the effects of different gait paces and ground types in the analysis of horse locomotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72882112020-06-17 Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb Sapone, Marie Martin, Pauline Ben Mansour, Khalil Château, Henry Marin, Frédéric Sensors (Basel) Article The development of on-board sensors, such as inertial measurement units (IMU), has made it possible to develop new methods for analyzing horse locomotion to detect lameness. The detection of spatiotemporal events is one of the keystones in the analysis of horse locomotion. This study assesses the performance of four methods for detecting Foot on and Foot off events. They were developed from an IMU positioned on the canon bone of eight horses during trotting recording on a treadmill and compared to a standard gold method based on motion capture. These methods are based on accelerometer and gyroscope data and use either thresholding or wavelets to detect stride events. The two methods developed from gyroscopic data showed more precision than those developed from accelerometric data with a bias less than 0.6% of stride duration for Foot on and 0.1% of stride duration for Foot off. The gyroscope is less impacted by the different patterns of strides, specific to each horse. To conclude, methods using the gyroscope present the potential of further developments to investigate the effects of different gait paces and ground types in the analysis of horse locomotion. MDPI 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7288211/ /pubmed/32466104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102983 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sapone, Marie
Martin, Pauline
Ben Mansour, Khalil
Château, Henry
Marin, Frédéric
Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb
title Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb
title_full Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb
title_fullStr Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb
title_short Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse’s Limb
title_sort comparison of trotting stance detection methods from an inertial measurement unit mounted on the horse’s limb
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102983
work_keys_str_mv AT saponemarie comparisonoftrottingstancedetectionmethodsfromaninertialmeasurementunitmountedonthehorseslimb
AT martinpauline comparisonoftrottingstancedetectionmethodsfromaninertialmeasurementunitmountedonthehorseslimb
AT benmansourkhalil comparisonoftrottingstancedetectionmethodsfromaninertialmeasurementunitmountedonthehorseslimb
AT chateauhenry comparisonoftrottingstancedetectionmethodsfromaninertialmeasurementunitmountedonthehorseslimb
AT marinfrederic comparisonoftrottingstancedetectionmethodsfromaninertialmeasurementunitmountedonthehorseslimb