Cargando…

Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice

This study investigated the quality properties of enhanced beef, manufactured by injecting the beef with a brine containing winter mushroom juice powder (WMJP). The enhanced beef was manufactured by injecting the eye of round with brine (15% by green weight). Four treatments consisted of control (no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Yun-Sang, Jo, Kyung, Lee, Seonmin, Yong, Hae In, Jung, Samooel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32568260
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.396
_version_ 1783545234297192448
author Choi, Yun-Sang
Jo, Kyung
Lee, Seonmin
Yong, Hae In
Jung, Samooel
author_facet Choi, Yun-Sang
Jo, Kyung
Lee, Seonmin
Yong, Hae In
Jung, Samooel
author_sort Choi, Yun-Sang
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the quality properties of enhanced beef, manufactured by injecting the beef with a brine containing winter mushroom juice powder (WMJP). The enhanced beef was manufactured by injecting the eye of round with brine (15% by green weight). Four treatments consisted of control (no injection of brine) and three enhanced beef, EBS (brine containing 5 g sodium chloride per kg beef), EBW 0.2 (brine containing 5 g sodium chloride and 2 g WMJP per kg beef), and EBW 0.5 (brine containing 5 g sodium chloride and 5 g WMJP per kg beef), were tested. The effect of enhancement or WMJP on the quality properties of beef was evaluated during storage at 4°C for 1, 5, and 10 days. Total aerobic bacteria counts between the control and the enhanced beef, and among EBS, EBW 0.2, and EBW 0.5 were not significantly different after any storage period (p > 0.05). The pH of beef was not different between the control and the enhanced beef, and among enhanced beef at 1 and 5 days of storage (p > 0.05). However, it was higher in the enhanced beef than control, and EBW 0.2 and EBW 0.5 had higher pH than EBS after 10 days of storage (p < 0.05). The enhanced beef showed a high total loss at all storage days (p < 0.05). There were no differences in total loss among enhanced beef after any storage period (p > 0.05). The enhanced beef had no consistent differences in L*, a*, and b* values with control during storage, however, EBW 0.5 showed high color stability. The hardness of the enhanced beef was significantly lower than that of the control after 10 days of storage, although the values were lower at all storage stages. EBS 0.5 had the lowest thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) value among cooked beef of all treatments at all storage days. The enhanced beef received higher scores in all sensory properties than control, and no negative effect of WMJP was found in the sensory quality of the enhanced beef. The use of winter mushroom juice can result in quality improvement in enhanced beef.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72882392020-06-18 Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice Choi, Yun-Sang Jo, Kyung Lee, Seonmin Yong, Hae In Jung, Samooel J Anim Sci Technol Research Article This study investigated the quality properties of enhanced beef, manufactured by injecting the beef with a brine containing winter mushroom juice powder (WMJP). The enhanced beef was manufactured by injecting the eye of round with brine (15% by green weight). Four treatments consisted of control (no injection of brine) and three enhanced beef, EBS (brine containing 5 g sodium chloride per kg beef), EBW 0.2 (brine containing 5 g sodium chloride and 2 g WMJP per kg beef), and EBW 0.5 (brine containing 5 g sodium chloride and 5 g WMJP per kg beef), were tested. The effect of enhancement or WMJP on the quality properties of beef was evaluated during storage at 4°C for 1, 5, and 10 days. Total aerobic bacteria counts between the control and the enhanced beef, and among EBS, EBW 0.2, and EBW 0.5 were not significantly different after any storage period (p > 0.05). The pH of beef was not different between the control and the enhanced beef, and among enhanced beef at 1 and 5 days of storage (p > 0.05). However, it was higher in the enhanced beef than control, and EBW 0.2 and EBW 0.5 had higher pH than EBS after 10 days of storage (p < 0.05). The enhanced beef showed a high total loss at all storage days (p < 0.05). There were no differences in total loss among enhanced beef after any storage period (p > 0.05). The enhanced beef had no consistent differences in L*, a*, and b* values with control during storage, however, EBW 0.5 showed high color stability. The hardness of the enhanced beef was significantly lower than that of the control after 10 days of storage, although the values were lower at all storage stages. EBS 0.5 had the lowest thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) value among cooked beef of all treatments at all storage days. The enhanced beef received higher scores in all sensory properties than control, and no negative effect of WMJP was found in the sensory quality of the enhanced beef. The use of winter mushroom juice can result in quality improvement in enhanced beef. Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology 2020-05 2020-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7288239/ /pubmed/32568260 http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.396 Text en © Copyright 2020 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Yun-Sang
Jo, Kyung
Lee, Seonmin
Yong, Hae In
Jung, Samooel
Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
title Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
title_full Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
title_fullStr Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
title_full_unstemmed Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
title_short Quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
title_sort quality characteristics of the enhanced beef using winter mushroom juice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32568260
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.396
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyunsang qualitycharacteristicsoftheenhancedbeefusingwintermushroomjuice
AT jokyung qualitycharacteristicsoftheenhancedbeefusingwintermushroomjuice
AT leeseonmin qualitycharacteristicsoftheenhancedbeefusingwintermushroomjuice
AT yonghaein qualitycharacteristicsoftheenhancedbeefusingwintermushroomjuice
AT jungsamooel qualitycharacteristicsoftheenhancedbeefusingwintermushroomjuice