Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
Rapid DNA analysis is an ultrafast and fully automated DNA-typing system, which can produce interpretable genetic profiles from biological samples within 90 minutes. This “swab in—profile out” method comprises DNA extraction, amplification by PCR multiplex, separation and detection of DNA fragments...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11050582 |
_version_ | 1783545249447018496 |
---|---|
author | Ragazzo, Michele Melchiorri, Stefano Manzo, Laura Errichiello, Valeria Puleri, Giulio Nicastro, Fabio Giardina, Emiliano |
author_facet | Ragazzo, Michele Melchiorri, Stefano Manzo, Laura Errichiello, Valeria Puleri, Giulio Nicastro, Fabio Giardina, Emiliano |
author_sort | Ragazzo, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid DNA analysis is an ultrafast and fully automated DNA-typing system, which can produce interpretable genetic profiles from biological samples within 90 minutes. This “swab in—profile out” method comprises DNA extraction, amplification by PCR multiplex, separation and detection of DNA fragments by capillary electrophoresis. The aim of study was the validation of the Accelerated Nuclear DNA Equipment (ANDE) 6C system as a typing method for reference samples according to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard. Here, we report the evaluation of the validity and reproducibility of results by the comparison of the genetic profiles generated by the ANDE 6C System with those generated by standard technologies. A quantity of 104 buccal swabs were analyzed both through the ANDE 6C technology and the traditional method (DNA extraction and quantification, amplification and separation by capillary electrophoresis). Positive typing was observed in 97% of cases for ANDE 6C technology with only three buccal swabs failing to reveal interpretable signals. Concordance was determined by comparing the allele calls generated by ANDE 6C and conventional technology. Comparison of 2800 genotypes revealed a concordance rate of 99.96%. These results met the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements, enabling us to receive the accreditation for this method. Finally, rapid technology has certainly reached a level of reliability which has made its use in laboratories of forensic genetics a reality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7288309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72883092020-06-17 Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods Ragazzo, Michele Melchiorri, Stefano Manzo, Laura Errichiello, Valeria Puleri, Giulio Nicastro, Fabio Giardina, Emiliano Genes (Basel) Article Rapid DNA analysis is an ultrafast and fully automated DNA-typing system, which can produce interpretable genetic profiles from biological samples within 90 minutes. This “swab in—profile out” method comprises DNA extraction, amplification by PCR multiplex, separation and detection of DNA fragments by capillary electrophoresis. The aim of study was the validation of the Accelerated Nuclear DNA Equipment (ANDE) 6C system as a typing method for reference samples according to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard. Here, we report the evaluation of the validity and reproducibility of results by the comparison of the genetic profiles generated by the ANDE 6C System with those generated by standard technologies. A quantity of 104 buccal swabs were analyzed both through the ANDE 6C technology and the traditional method (DNA extraction and quantification, amplification and separation by capillary electrophoresis). Positive typing was observed in 97% of cases for ANDE 6C technology with only three buccal swabs failing to reveal interpretable signals. Concordance was determined by comparing the allele calls generated by ANDE 6C and conventional technology. Comparison of 2800 genotypes revealed a concordance rate of 99.96%. These results met the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements, enabling us to receive the accreditation for this method. Finally, rapid technology has certainly reached a level of reliability which has made its use in laboratories of forensic genetics a reality. MDPI 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7288309/ /pubmed/32456006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11050582 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ragazzo, Michele Melchiorri, Stefano Manzo, Laura Errichiello, Valeria Puleri, Giulio Nicastro, Fabio Giardina, Emiliano Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods |
title | Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods |
title_sort | comparative analysis of ande 6c rapid dna analysis system and traditional methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11050582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ragazzomichele comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods AT melchiorristefano comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods AT manzolaura comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods AT errichiellovaleria comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods AT pulerigiulio comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods AT nicastrofabio comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods AT giardinaemiliano comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods |