Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods

Rapid DNA analysis is an ultrafast and fully automated DNA-typing system, which can produce interpretable genetic profiles from biological samples within 90 minutes. This “swab in—profile out” method comprises DNA extraction, amplification by PCR multiplex, separation and detection of DNA fragments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ragazzo, Michele, Melchiorri, Stefano, Manzo, Laura, Errichiello, Valeria, Puleri, Giulio, Nicastro, Fabio, Giardina, Emiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11050582
_version_ 1783545249447018496
author Ragazzo, Michele
Melchiorri, Stefano
Manzo, Laura
Errichiello, Valeria
Puleri, Giulio
Nicastro, Fabio
Giardina, Emiliano
author_facet Ragazzo, Michele
Melchiorri, Stefano
Manzo, Laura
Errichiello, Valeria
Puleri, Giulio
Nicastro, Fabio
Giardina, Emiliano
author_sort Ragazzo, Michele
collection PubMed
description Rapid DNA analysis is an ultrafast and fully automated DNA-typing system, which can produce interpretable genetic profiles from biological samples within 90 minutes. This “swab in—profile out” method comprises DNA extraction, amplification by PCR multiplex, separation and detection of DNA fragments by capillary electrophoresis. The aim of study was the validation of the Accelerated Nuclear DNA Equipment (ANDE) 6C system as a typing method for reference samples according to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard. Here, we report the evaluation of the validity and reproducibility of results by the comparison of the genetic profiles generated by the ANDE 6C System with those generated by standard technologies. A quantity of 104 buccal swabs were analyzed both through the ANDE 6C technology and the traditional method (DNA extraction and quantification, amplification and separation by capillary electrophoresis). Positive typing was observed in 97% of cases for ANDE 6C technology with only three buccal swabs failing to reveal interpretable signals. Concordance was determined by comparing the allele calls generated by ANDE 6C and conventional technology. Comparison of 2800 genotypes revealed a concordance rate of 99.96%. These results met the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements, enabling us to receive the accreditation for this method. Finally, rapid technology has certainly reached a level of reliability which has made its use in laboratories of forensic genetics a reality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72883092020-06-17 Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods Ragazzo, Michele Melchiorri, Stefano Manzo, Laura Errichiello, Valeria Puleri, Giulio Nicastro, Fabio Giardina, Emiliano Genes (Basel) Article Rapid DNA analysis is an ultrafast and fully automated DNA-typing system, which can produce interpretable genetic profiles from biological samples within 90 minutes. This “swab in—profile out” method comprises DNA extraction, amplification by PCR multiplex, separation and detection of DNA fragments by capillary electrophoresis. The aim of study was the validation of the Accelerated Nuclear DNA Equipment (ANDE) 6C system as a typing method for reference samples according to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard. Here, we report the evaluation of the validity and reproducibility of results by the comparison of the genetic profiles generated by the ANDE 6C System with those generated by standard technologies. A quantity of 104 buccal swabs were analyzed both through the ANDE 6C technology and the traditional method (DNA extraction and quantification, amplification and separation by capillary electrophoresis). Positive typing was observed in 97% of cases for ANDE 6C technology with only three buccal swabs failing to reveal interpretable signals. Concordance was determined by comparing the allele calls generated by ANDE 6C and conventional technology. Comparison of 2800 genotypes revealed a concordance rate of 99.96%. These results met the ISO/IEC 17025 requirements, enabling us to receive the accreditation for this method. Finally, rapid technology has certainly reached a level of reliability which has made its use in laboratories of forensic genetics a reality. MDPI 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7288309/ /pubmed/32456006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11050582 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ragazzo, Michele
Melchiorri, Stefano
Manzo, Laura
Errichiello, Valeria
Puleri, Giulio
Nicastro, Fabio
Giardina, Emiliano
Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
title Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
title_full Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
title_short Comparative Analysis of ANDE 6C Rapid DNA Analysis System and Traditional Methods
title_sort comparative analysis of ande 6c rapid dna analysis system and traditional methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32456006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11050582
work_keys_str_mv AT ragazzomichele comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods
AT melchiorristefano comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods
AT manzolaura comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods
AT errichiellovaleria comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods
AT pulerigiulio comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods
AT nicastrofabio comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods
AT giardinaemiliano comparativeanalysisofande6crapiddnaanalysissystemandtraditionalmethods