Cargando…

Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015

BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Proteus are mostly opportunistic pathogens that cause a variety of infections in humans. The molecular evolutionary characteristics and genetic relationships among Proteus species have not been elucidated to date. In this study, we developed a multilocus sequence ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Hang, Lu, Binghuai, Li, Zhenpeng, Huang, Zhenzhou, Cai, Hongyan, Yu, Keyi, Wang, Duochun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32522175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01844-1
_version_ 1783545268015202304
author Dai, Hang
Lu, Binghuai
Li, Zhenpeng
Huang, Zhenzhou
Cai, Hongyan
Yu, Keyi
Wang, Duochun
author_facet Dai, Hang
Lu, Binghuai
Li, Zhenpeng
Huang, Zhenzhou
Cai, Hongyan
Yu, Keyi
Wang, Duochun
author_sort Dai, Hang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Proteus are mostly opportunistic pathogens that cause a variety of infections in humans. The molecular evolutionary characteristics and genetic relationships among Proteus species have not been elucidated to date. In this study, we developed a multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach based on five housekeeping genes (HKGs) to delineate phylogenetic relationships of species within the genus Proteus. RESULTS: Of all 223 Proteus strains collected in the current study, the phylogenetic tree of five concatenated HKGs (dnaJ, mdh, pyrC, recA and rpoD) divided 223 strains into eleven clusters, which were representative of 11 species of Proteus. Meanwhile, the phylogenetic trees of the five individual HKGs also corresponded to that of the concatenated tree, except for recA, which clustered four strains at an independent cluster. The evaluation of inter- and intraspecies distances of HKG concatenation indicated that all interspecies distances were significantly different from intraspecies distances, which revealed that these HKG concatenations can be used as gene markers to distinguish different Proteus species. Further web-based DNA-DNA hybridization estimated by genome of type strains confirmed the validity of the MLSA, and each of eleven clusters was congruent with the most abundant Proteus species. In addition, we used the established MLSA method to identify the randomly collected Proteus and found that P. mirabilis is the most abundant species. However, the second most abundant species is P. terrae but not P. vulgaris. Combined with the genetic, genomic and phenotypic characteristics, these findings indicate that three species, P. terrae, P. cibarius and Proteus genospecies 5, should be regarded as heterotypic synonyms, and the species should be renamed P. terrae, while Proteus genospecies 5 has not been named to date. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that MLSA is a powerful method for the discrimination and classification of Proteus at the species level. The MLSA scheme provides a rapid and inexpensive means of identifying Proteus strains. The identification of Proteus species determined by the MLSA approach plays an important role in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Proteus infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72883992020-06-11 Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015 Dai, Hang Lu, Binghuai Li, Zhenpeng Huang, Zhenzhou Cai, Hongyan Yu, Keyi Wang, Duochun BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Proteus are mostly opportunistic pathogens that cause a variety of infections in humans. The molecular evolutionary characteristics and genetic relationships among Proteus species have not been elucidated to date. In this study, we developed a multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach based on five housekeeping genes (HKGs) to delineate phylogenetic relationships of species within the genus Proteus. RESULTS: Of all 223 Proteus strains collected in the current study, the phylogenetic tree of five concatenated HKGs (dnaJ, mdh, pyrC, recA and rpoD) divided 223 strains into eleven clusters, which were representative of 11 species of Proteus. Meanwhile, the phylogenetic trees of the five individual HKGs also corresponded to that of the concatenated tree, except for recA, which clustered four strains at an independent cluster. The evaluation of inter- and intraspecies distances of HKG concatenation indicated that all interspecies distances were significantly different from intraspecies distances, which revealed that these HKG concatenations can be used as gene markers to distinguish different Proteus species. Further web-based DNA-DNA hybridization estimated by genome of type strains confirmed the validity of the MLSA, and each of eleven clusters was congruent with the most abundant Proteus species. In addition, we used the established MLSA method to identify the randomly collected Proteus and found that P. mirabilis is the most abundant species. However, the second most abundant species is P. terrae but not P. vulgaris. Combined with the genetic, genomic and phenotypic characteristics, these findings indicate that three species, P. terrae, P. cibarius and Proteus genospecies 5, should be regarded as heterotypic synonyms, and the species should be renamed P. terrae, while Proteus genospecies 5 has not been named to date. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that MLSA is a powerful method for the discrimination and classification of Proteus at the species level. The MLSA scheme provides a rapid and inexpensive means of identifying Proteus strains. The identification of Proteus species determined by the MLSA approach plays an important role in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of Proteus infection. BioMed Central 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7288399/ /pubmed/32522175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01844-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dai, Hang
Lu, Binghuai
Li, Zhenpeng
Huang, Zhenzhou
Cai, Hongyan
Yu, Keyi
Wang, Duochun
Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015
title Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015
title_full Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015
title_fullStr Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015
title_full_unstemmed Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015
title_short Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O’Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015
title_sort multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus proteus and reclassification of proteus genospecies 5 o’hara et al. 2000, proteus cibarius hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of proteus terrae behrendt et al. 2015
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32522175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01844-1
work_keys_str_mv AT daihang multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015
AT lubinghuai multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015
AT lizhenpeng multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015
AT huangzhenzhou multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015
AT caihongyan multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015
AT yukeyi multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015
AT wangduochun multilocussequenceanalysisforthetaxonomicupdatingandidentificationofthegenusproteusandreclassificationofproteusgenospecies5oharaetal2000proteuscibariushyunetal2016aslaterheterotypicsynonymsofproteusterraebehrendtetal2015