Cargando…

Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury

Neuronal networks, especially those in the central nervous system (CNS), evolved to support extensive functional capabilities while ensuring stability. Several physiological “brakes” that maintain the stability of the neuronal networks in a healthy state quickly become a hinderance postinjury. These...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagappan, Palaniappan Ganesh, Chen, Hong, Wang, De-Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00259-3
_version_ 1783545273529663488
author Nagappan, Palaniappan Ganesh
Chen, Hong
Wang, De-Yun
author_facet Nagappan, Palaniappan Ganesh
Chen, Hong
Wang, De-Yun
author_sort Nagappan, Palaniappan Ganesh
collection PubMed
description Neuronal networks, especially those in the central nervous system (CNS), evolved to support extensive functional capabilities while ensuring stability. Several physiological “brakes” that maintain the stability of the neuronal networks in a healthy state quickly become a hinderance postinjury. These “brakes” include inhibition from the extracellular environment, intrinsic factors of neurons and the control of neuronal plasticity. There are distinct differences between the neuronal networks in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and the CNS. Underpinning these differences is the trade-off between reduced functional capabilities with increased adaptability through the formation of new connections and new neurons. The PNS has “facilitators” that stimulate neuroregeneration and plasticity, while the CNS has “brakes” that limit them. By studying how these “facilitators” and “brakes” work and identifying the key processes and molecules involved, we can attempt to apply these theories to the neuronal networks of the CNS to increase its adaptability. The difference in adaptability between the CNS and PNS leads to a difference in neuroregenerative properties and plasticity. Plasticity ensures quick functional recovery of abilities in the short and medium term. Neuroregeneration involves synthesizing new neurons and connections, providing extra resources in the long term to replace those damaged by the injury, and achieving a lasting functional recovery. Therefore, by understanding the factors that affect neuroregeneration and plasticity, we can combine their advantages and develop rehabilitation techniques. Rehabilitation training methods, coordinated with pharmacological interventions and/or electrical stimulation, contributes to a precise, holistic treatment plan that achieves functional recovery from nervous system injuries. Furthermore, these techniques are not limited to limb movement, as other functions lost as a result of brain injury, such as speech, can also be recovered with an appropriate training program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72884252020-06-15 Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury Nagappan, Palaniappan Ganesh Chen, Hong Wang, De-Yun Mil Med Res Review Neuronal networks, especially those in the central nervous system (CNS), evolved to support extensive functional capabilities while ensuring stability. Several physiological “brakes” that maintain the stability of the neuronal networks in a healthy state quickly become a hinderance postinjury. These “brakes” include inhibition from the extracellular environment, intrinsic factors of neurons and the control of neuronal plasticity. There are distinct differences between the neuronal networks in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and the CNS. Underpinning these differences is the trade-off between reduced functional capabilities with increased adaptability through the formation of new connections and new neurons. The PNS has “facilitators” that stimulate neuroregeneration and plasticity, while the CNS has “brakes” that limit them. By studying how these “facilitators” and “brakes” work and identifying the key processes and molecules involved, we can attempt to apply these theories to the neuronal networks of the CNS to increase its adaptability. The difference in adaptability between the CNS and PNS leads to a difference in neuroregenerative properties and plasticity. Plasticity ensures quick functional recovery of abilities in the short and medium term. Neuroregeneration involves synthesizing new neurons and connections, providing extra resources in the long term to replace those damaged by the injury, and achieving a lasting functional recovery. Therefore, by understanding the factors that affect neuroregeneration and plasticity, we can combine their advantages and develop rehabilitation techniques. Rehabilitation training methods, coordinated with pharmacological interventions and/or electrical stimulation, contributes to a precise, holistic treatment plan that achieves functional recovery from nervous system injuries. Furthermore, these techniques are not limited to limb movement, as other functions lost as a result of brain injury, such as speech, can also be recovered with an appropriate training program. BioMed Central 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7288425/ /pubmed/32527334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00259-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Nagappan, Palaniappan Ganesh
Chen, Hong
Wang, De-Yun
Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
title Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
title_full Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
title_fullStr Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
title_full_unstemmed Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
title_short Neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
title_sort neuroregeneration and plasticity: a review of the physiological mechanisms for achieving functional recovery postinjury
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00259-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nagappanpalaniappanganesh neuroregenerationandplasticityareviewofthephysiologicalmechanismsforachievingfunctionalrecoverypostinjury
AT chenhong neuroregenerationandplasticityareviewofthephysiologicalmechanismsforachievingfunctionalrecoverypostinjury
AT wangdeyun neuroregenerationandplasticityareviewofthephysiologicalmechanismsforachievingfunctionalrecoverypostinjury