Cargando…
Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows
Five experiments were conducted to evaluate the lysine (Lys) requirements of lactating sows. All diets were formulated to be isocaloric 3.46 Mcal ME/kg and met or exceeded National Research Council recommendations. In all studies, sow feed intake, body weight loss/gain, subsequent reproduction, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa072 |
_version_ | 1783545334819979264 |
---|---|
author | Greiner, Laura Srichana, Pariat Usry, James L Neill, Casey Allee, Gary L Connor, Joseph Touchette, Kevin J Knight, Christopher D |
author_facet | Greiner, Laura Srichana, Pariat Usry, James L Neill, Casey Allee, Gary L Connor, Joseph Touchette, Kevin J Knight, Christopher D |
author_sort | Greiner, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Five experiments were conducted to evaluate the lysine (Lys) requirements of lactating sows. All diets were formulated to be isocaloric 3.46 Mcal ME/kg and met or exceeded National Research Council recommendations. In all studies, sow feed intake, body weight loss/gain, subsequent reproduction, and litter growth rate (LGR) were evaluated. The data were analyzed as randomized complete block design using generalized linear model in SAS with parity as a block. Two hundred and sixty-four primiparous sows (PIC Camborough 22) were randomly allotted to one of five lactation treatments (total Lys of 0.95%, 1.05%, 1.15%, 1.25%, and 1.35%) in Exp. 1 from August 2005 through October 2005. As daily total dietary Lys intake increased from 52.10 to 77.53 g, piglet ADG and daily litter gain linearly improved (P < 0.01). From February 2007 through April 2007, 336 multiparous sows (parity 4 and older, PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five lactation treatments (total Lys 0.85%, 0.95%, 1.05%, 1.15%, or 1.25%) in Exp. 2. As dietary total Lys increased from 0.85% to 1.25% of the diet, there were no significant differences in litter performance, such as ADG, daily litter gain, and the number of pigs weaned. Experiment 3 was conducted from October 2008 through January 2009. Two hundred and seventy-nine primiparous gilts (PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five lactation treatments (total Lys 1.14%, 1.25%, 1.35%, 1.46%, and 1.57%). Actual total Lys intakes increased from 56.74 to 77.12 g/d. Feeding total dietary Lys quadratically decreased (P < 0.01) weaning-to-estrus interval and increased percentage bred by 10 d (P = 0.02). In Exp. 4, 200 sows (parity 4 and older, PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five treatments (0.85%, 0.95%, 1.05%, 1.15%, or 1.25% total Lys) from January 2008 through March 2008. As dietary total Lys increased from 42.40 to 66.15 g/d, sow body weight and LGRs were not influenced by dietary total Lys intakes. In Exp. 5, 324 parity 3 sows (PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five treatments (0.77%, 0.92%, 1.08%, 1.23%, and 1.38% total Lys) from August 2009 through October 2009. As daily dietary total Lys intake increased from 39.44 to 67.32 g, the percentage of sows bred by 10 d increased (P = 0.02), as well as the LGR. A broken-line quadratic regression analysis demonstrated that the total Lys requirement for LGR for parity 1 females is calculated as 72.68 − [6.04 × (3.55 − LGR)] and for parity 3+ females as 92.03 − [11.9 × (4.24 − LGR)]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7288739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72887392020-07-22 Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows Greiner, Laura Srichana, Pariat Usry, James L Neill, Casey Allee, Gary L Connor, Joseph Touchette, Kevin J Knight, Christopher D Transl Anim Sci Non Ruminant Nutrition Five experiments were conducted to evaluate the lysine (Lys) requirements of lactating sows. All diets were formulated to be isocaloric 3.46 Mcal ME/kg and met or exceeded National Research Council recommendations. In all studies, sow feed intake, body weight loss/gain, subsequent reproduction, and litter growth rate (LGR) were evaluated. The data were analyzed as randomized complete block design using generalized linear model in SAS with parity as a block. Two hundred and sixty-four primiparous sows (PIC Camborough 22) were randomly allotted to one of five lactation treatments (total Lys of 0.95%, 1.05%, 1.15%, 1.25%, and 1.35%) in Exp. 1 from August 2005 through October 2005. As daily total dietary Lys intake increased from 52.10 to 77.53 g, piglet ADG and daily litter gain linearly improved (P < 0.01). From February 2007 through April 2007, 336 multiparous sows (parity 4 and older, PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five lactation treatments (total Lys 0.85%, 0.95%, 1.05%, 1.15%, or 1.25%) in Exp. 2. As dietary total Lys increased from 0.85% to 1.25% of the diet, there were no significant differences in litter performance, such as ADG, daily litter gain, and the number of pigs weaned. Experiment 3 was conducted from October 2008 through January 2009. Two hundred and seventy-nine primiparous gilts (PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five lactation treatments (total Lys 1.14%, 1.25%, 1.35%, 1.46%, and 1.57%). Actual total Lys intakes increased from 56.74 to 77.12 g/d. Feeding total dietary Lys quadratically decreased (P < 0.01) weaning-to-estrus interval and increased percentage bred by 10 d (P = 0.02). In Exp. 4, 200 sows (parity 4 and older, PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five treatments (0.85%, 0.95%, 1.05%, 1.15%, or 1.25% total Lys) from January 2008 through March 2008. As dietary total Lys increased from 42.40 to 66.15 g/d, sow body weight and LGRs were not influenced by dietary total Lys intakes. In Exp. 5, 324 parity 3 sows (PIC Camborough 29) were randomly allotted to one of five treatments (0.77%, 0.92%, 1.08%, 1.23%, and 1.38% total Lys) from August 2009 through October 2009. As daily dietary total Lys intake increased from 39.44 to 67.32 g, the percentage of sows bred by 10 d increased (P = 0.02), as well as the LGR. A broken-line quadratic regression analysis demonstrated that the total Lys requirement for LGR for parity 1 females is calculated as 72.68 − [6.04 × (3.55 − LGR)] and for parity 3+ females as 92.03 − [11.9 × (4.24 − LGR)]. Oxford University Press 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7288739/ /pubmed/32705067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa072 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Non Ruminant Nutrition Greiner, Laura Srichana, Pariat Usry, James L Neill, Casey Allee, Gary L Connor, Joseph Touchette, Kevin J Knight, Christopher D Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
title | Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
title_full | Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
title_fullStr | Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
title_full_unstemmed | Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
title_short | Lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
title_sort | lysine (protein) requirements of lactating sows |
topic | Non Ruminant Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greinerlaura lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT srichanapariat lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT usryjamesl lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT neillcasey lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT alleegaryl lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT connorjoseph lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT touchettekevinj lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows AT knightchristopherd lysineproteinrequirementsoflactatingsows |