Cargando…

A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common, debilitating condition that causes major impact on quality of life for those affected. Non-surgical treatment options include anorectal biofeedback therapy (BF) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), usually performed separately. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazor, Yoav, Prott, Gillian M., Sequeira, Carol, Jones, Michael, Ejova, Anastasia, Kellow, John E., Schnitzler, Margaret, Malcolm, Allison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916388
_version_ 1783545343943639040
author Mazor, Yoav
Prott, Gillian M.
Sequeira, Carol
Jones, Michael
Ejova, Anastasia
Kellow, John E.
Schnitzler, Margaret
Malcolm, Allison
author_facet Mazor, Yoav
Prott, Gillian M.
Sequeira, Carol
Jones, Michael
Ejova, Anastasia
Kellow, John E.
Schnitzler, Margaret
Malcolm, Allison
author_sort Mazor, Yoav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common, debilitating condition that causes major impact on quality of life for those affected. Non-surgical treatment options include anorectal biofeedback therapy (BF) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), usually performed separately. The aims of the current study were to determine the feasibility, tolerability, safety, and efficacy of performing a combined BF and PTNS treatment protocol. METHODS: Female patients with urge FI were offered a novel pilot program combining BF with PTNS. The treatment protocol consisted of 13 weekly sessions: an educational session, followed by 5 combined BF and PTNS sessions, 6 PTNS and a final combined session. Anorectal physiology and clinical outcomes were assessed throughout the program. For efficacy, patients were compared with BF only historical FI patients matched for age, parity, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 12/13 (93%) patients completed the full program. Overall attendance rate was 93% (157/169 sessions). Patient comfort score with treatment was rated high at 9.8/10 (SD 0.7) for PTNS and 8.6/10 (SD 1.7) for the BF component. No major side effects were reported. A reduction of at least 50% in FI episodes/week was achieved by 58% of patients by visit 6, and 92% by visit 13. No physiology changes were evident immediately following PTNS compared with before, but pressure during sustained anal squeeze improved by the end of the treatment course. Comparing outcomes with historical matched controls, reductions in weekly FI episodes were more pronounced in the BF only group at visit 6, but not week 13. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, concurrent PTNS and anorectal biofeedback therapy has been shown to be feasible, comfortable, and low risk. The combined protocol is likely to be an effective treatment for FI, but future research could focus on optimizing patient selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72888162020-06-22 A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence Mazor, Yoav Prott, Gillian M. Sequeira, Carol Jones, Michael Ejova, Anastasia Kellow, John E. Schnitzler, Margaret Malcolm, Allison Therap Adv Gastroenterol Management of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI): Where Are We Now? BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common, debilitating condition that causes major impact on quality of life for those affected. Non-surgical treatment options include anorectal biofeedback therapy (BF) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), usually performed separately. The aims of the current study were to determine the feasibility, tolerability, safety, and efficacy of performing a combined BF and PTNS treatment protocol. METHODS: Female patients with urge FI were offered a novel pilot program combining BF with PTNS. The treatment protocol consisted of 13 weekly sessions: an educational session, followed by 5 combined BF and PTNS sessions, 6 PTNS and a final combined session. Anorectal physiology and clinical outcomes were assessed throughout the program. For efficacy, patients were compared with BF only historical FI patients matched for age, parity, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 12/13 (93%) patients completed the full program. Overall attendance rate was 93% (157/169 sessions). Patient comfort score with treatment was rated high at 9.8/10 (SD 0.7) for PTNS and 8.6/10 (SD 1.7) for the BF component. No major side effects were reported. A reduction of at least 50% in FI episodes/week was achieved by 58% of patients by visit 6, and 92% by visit 13. No physiology changes were evident immediately following PTNS compared with before, but pressure during sustained anal squeeze improved by the end of the treatment course. Comparing outcomes with historical matched controls, reductions in weekly FI episodes were more pronounced in the BF only group at visit 6, but not week 13. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, concurrent PTNS and anorectal biofeedback therapy has been shown to be feasible, comfortable, and low risk. The combined protocol is likely to be an effective treatment for FI, but future research could focus on optimizing patient selection. SAGE Publications 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7288816/ /pubmed/32577132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916388 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Management of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI): Where Are We Now?
Mazor, Yoav
Prott, Gillian M.
Sequeira, Carol
Jones, Michael
Ejova, Anastasia
Kellow, John E.
Schnitzler, Margaret
Malcolm, Allison
A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
title A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
title_full A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
title_fullStr A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
title_full_unstemmed A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
title_short A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
title_sort novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence
topic Management of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI): Where Are We Now?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820916388
work_keys_str_mv AT mazoryoav anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT prottgillianm anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT sequeiracarol anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT jonesmichael anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT ejovaanastasia anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT kellowjohne anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT schnitzlermargaret anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT malcolmallison anovelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT mazoryoav novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT prottgillianm novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT sequeiracarol novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT jonesmichael novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT ejovaanastasia novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT kellowjohne novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT schnitzlermargaret novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence
AT malcolmallison novelcombinedanorectalbiofeedbackandpercutaneoustibialnervestimulationprotocolfortreatingfecalincontinence