Cargando…

Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018

INTRODUCTION: Hemiarthroplasty is increasingly used for the treatment of geriatric femoral neck fractures in an effort to optimize value-based care. The current American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines released in 2014 for the treatment of geriatric hip fractures recommend the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kibble, Kendra, Peck, Sarah C., Parikh, Harsh R., Flagstad, Ilexa, Gorman, Tiffany, Okelana, A. Bandele, Cunningham, Brian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320927378
_version_ 1783545351106461696
author Kibble, Kendra
Peck, Sarah C.
Parikh, Harsh R.
Flagstad, Ilexa
Gorman, Tiffany
Okelana, A. Bandele
Cunningham, Brian P.
author_facet Kibble, Kendra
Peck, Sarah C.
Parikh, Harsh R.
Flagstad, Ilexa
Gorman, Tiffany
Okelana, A. Bandele
Cunningham, Brian P.
author_sort Kibble, Kendra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hemiarthroplasty is increasingly used for the treatment of geriatric femoral neck fractures in an effort to optimize value-based care. The current American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines released in 2014 for the treatment of geriatric hip fractures recommend the utilization of monopolar cemented constructs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hip hemiarthroplasty implant cost variability and implant selection trends from 2006 to 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 940 geriatric hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty was conducted across 3 institutions from 2006 to 2018. Variables examined were construct type, surgeon, operative time, patient mortality, and implant cost. Statistical analysis consisted of multigroup comparative tests and multiple linear regression analyses to evaluate correlative measures. RESULTS: The study population was 85.0 ± 7.9 years of age with a body mass index of 24.0 ± 5.5. A total of 33 (3.5%) patients were deceased at the 90-day postoperative mark and 45 (4.8%) patients at the 1-year mark. There was no statistical difference in terms of mortality between the 4 implant cohorts at the 90-day mark (P = .56) and 1-year mark (P = .24). The bipolar press-fit construct was the most expensive, US$3900.61 ± US$2607.54, and the monopolar cemented construct was the least expensive, US$2618.68 ± US$1834.16. The mean operative time was 6 minutes greater for press-fit implants, 93.6 ± 32.0, than cemented implants, 87.1 ± 33.6 (P = .02). The use of monopolar cemented implants increased from 12.1% to 83.3%, while bipolar press-fit decreased from 57.6% to 4.6% from 2013 to 2018. DISCUSSION: The use of a bipolar and/or press-fit implant significantly increases construct cost despite little evidence in the literature of improved outcomes. Contrary to previous research, cemented implants do not increase the operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Encouragingly, selection of the most cost-conscience implant, monopolar cemented, has been increasing since 2014, which may reflect the influence of current AAOS guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72888462020-06-22 Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018 Kibble, Kendra Peck, Sarah C. Parikh, Harsh R. Flagstad, Ilexa Gorman, Tiffany Okelana, A. Bandele Cunningham, Brian P. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Hip Fracture Care for 2020: Best Care, Best Value INTRODUCTION: Hemiarthroplasty is increasingly used for the treatment of geriatric femoral neck fractures in an effort to optimize value-based care. The current American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines released in 2014 for the treatment of geriatric hip fractures recommend the utilization of monopolar cemented constructs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hip hemiarthroplasty implant cost variability and implant selection trends from 2006 to 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 940 geriatric hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty was conducted across 3 institutions from 2006 to 2018. Variables examined were construct type, surgeon, operative time, patient mortality, and implant cost. Statistical analysis consisted of multigroup comparative tests and multiple linear regression analyses to evaluate correlative measures. RESULTS: The study population was 85.0 ± 7.9 years of age with a body mass index of 24.0 ± 5.5. A total of 33 (3.5%) patients were deceased at the 90-day postoperative mark and 45 (4.8%) patients at the 1-year mark. There was no statistical difference in terms of mortality between the 4 implant cohorts at the 90-day mark (P = .56) and 1-year mark (P = .24). The bipolar press-fit construct was the most expensive, US$3900.61 ± US$2607.54, and the monopolar cemented construct was the least expensive, US$2618.68 ± US$1834.16. The mean operative time was 6 minutes greater for press-fit implants, 93.6 ± 32.0, than cemented implants, 87.1 ± 33.6 (P = .02). The use of monopolar cemented implants increased from 12.1% to 83.3%, while bipolar press-fit decreased from 57.6% to 4.6% from 2013 to 2018. DISCUSSION: The use of a bipolar and/or press-fit implant significantly increases construct cost despite little evidence in the literature of improved outcomes. Contrary to previous research, cemented implants do not increase the operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Encouragingly, selection of the most cost-conscience implant, monopolar cemented, has been increasing since 2014, which may reflect the influence of current AAOS guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. SAGE Publications 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7288846/ /pubmed/32577318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320927378 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Hip Fracture Care for 2020: Best Care, Best Value
Kibble, Kendra
Peck, Sarah C.
Parikh, Harsh R.
Flagstad, Ilexa
Gorman, Tiffany
Okelana, A. Bandele
Cunningham, Brian P.
Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018
title Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018
title_full Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018
title_fullStr Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018
title_short Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018
title_sort geriatric femoral neck fractures: hemiarthroplasty implant trends across a health system from 2006 to 2018
topic Hip Fracture Care for 2020: Best Care, Best Value
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320927378
work_keys_str_mv AT kibblekendra geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018
AT pecksarahc geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018
AT parikhharshr geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018
AT flagstadilexa geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018
AT gormantiffany geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018
AT okelanaabandele geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018
AT cunninghambrianp geriatricfemoralneckfractureshemiarthroplastyimplanttrendsacrossahealthsystemfrom2006to2018