Cargando…

Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis

Purpose: To investigate the physiological uptake of hybrid fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before and after an uncomplicated endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) procedure as a possible tool to diagnose EVAS graft infection and different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groot Jebbink, Erik, van Den Ham, Leo H., van Woudenberg, Beau B. J., Slart, Riemer H. J. A., Zeebregts, Clark J., Rijnders, Ton J. M., Lardenoije, Jan-Willem H. P., Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602820913888
_version_ 1783545352298692608
author Groot Jebbink, Erik
van Den Ham, Leo H.
van Woudenberg, Beau B. J.
Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
Rijnders, Ton J. M.
Lardenoije, Jan-Willem H. P.
Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
author_facet Groot Jebbink, Erik
van Den Ham, Leo H.
van Woudenberg, Beau B. J.
Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
Rijnders, Ton J. M.
Lardenoije, Jan-Willem H. P.
Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
author_sort Groot Jebbink, Erik
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To investigate the physiological uptake of hybrid fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before and after an uncomplicated endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) procedure as a possible tool to diagnose EVAS graft infection and differentiate from postimplantation syndrome. Materials and Methods: Eight consecutive male patients (median age 78 years) scheduled for elective EVAS were included in the prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02349100). FDG-PET/CT scans were performed in all patients before the procedure and 6 weeks after EVAS. The abdominal aorta was analyzed in 4 regions: suprarenal, infrarenal neck, aneurysm sac, and iliac. The following parameters were obtained for each region: standard uptake value (SUV), tissue to background ratio (TBR), and visual examination of FDG uptake to ascertain its distribution. Demographic data were obtained from medical files and scored based on reporting standards. Results: Visual examination showed no difference between pre- and postprocedure FDG uptake, which was homogenous. In the suprarenal region no significant pre- and postprocedure differences were observed for the SUV and TBR parameters. The infrarenal neck region showed a significant decrease in the SUV and no significant decrease in the TBR. The aneurysm sac and iliac regions both showed a significant decrease in SUV and TBR between the pre- and postprocedure scans. Conclusion: Physiological FDG uptake after EVAS was stable or decreased with regard to the preprocedure measurements. Future research is needed to assess the applicability and cutoff values of FDG-PET/CT scanning to detect endograft infection after EVAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72888562020-06-29 Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis Groot Jebbink, Erik van Den Ham, Leo H. van Woudenberg, Beau B. J. Slart, Riemer H. J. A. Zeebregts, Clark J. Rijnders, Ton J. M. Lardenoije, Jan-Willem H. P. Reijnen, Michel M. P. J. J Endovasc Ther Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Purpose: To investigate the physiological uptake of hybrid fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before and after an uncomplicated endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) procedure as a possible tool to diagnose EVAS graft infection and differentiate from postimplantation syndrome. Materials and Methods: Eight consecutive male patients (median age 78 years) scheduled for elective EVAS were included in the prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02349100). FDG-PET/CT scans were performed in all patients before the procedure and 6 weeks after EVAS. The abdominal aorta was analyzed in 4 regions: suprarenal, infrarenal neck, aneurysm sac, and iliac. The following parameters were obtained for each region: standard uptake value (SUV), tissue to background ratio (TBR), and visual examination of FDG uptake to ascertain its distribution. Demographic data were obtained from medical files and scored based on reporting standards. Results: Visual examination showed no difference between pre- and postprocedure FDG uptake, which was homogenous. In the suprarenal region no significant pre- and postprocedure differences were observed for the SUV and TBR parameters. The infrarenal neck region showed a significant decrease in the SUV and no significant decrease in the TBR. The aneurysm sac and iliac regions both showed a significant decrease in SUV and TBR between the pre- and postprocedure scans. Conclusion: Physiological FDG uptake after EVAS was stable or decreased with regard to the preprocedure measurements. Future research is needed to assess the applicability and cutoff values of FDG-PET/CT scanning to detect endograft infection after EVAS. SAGE Publications 2020-04-15 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7288856/ /pubmed/32295455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602820913888 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing
Groot Jebbink, Erik
van Den Ham, Leo H.
van Woudenberg, Beau B. J.
Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
Rijnders, Ton J. M.
Lardenoije, Jan-Willem H. P.
Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis
title Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis
title_full Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis
title_fullStr Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis
title_short Physiological Appearance of Hybrid FDG–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Following Uncomplicated Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix Endoprosthesis
title_sort physiological appearance of hybrid fdg–positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging following uncomplicated endovascular aneurysm sealing using the nellix endoprosthesis
topic Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32295455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602820913888
work_keys_str_mv AT grootjebbinkerik physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT vandenhamleoh physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT vanwoudenbergbeaubj physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT slartriemerhja physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT zeebregtsclarkj physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT rijnderstonjm physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT lardenoijejanwillemhp physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis
AT reijnenmichelmpj physiologicalappearanceofhybridfdgpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyimagingfollowinguncomplicatedendovascularaneurysmsealingusingthenellixendoprosthesis