Cargando…

What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frey, Jordan D., Salibian, Ara A., Bekisz, Jonathan M., Choi, Mihye, Karp, Nolan S., Thanik, Vishal D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002585
_version_ 1783545357639090176
author Frey, Jordan D.
Salibian, Ara A.
Bekisz, Jonathan M.
Choi, Mihye
Karp, Nolan S.
Thanik, Vishal D.
author_facet Frey, Jordan D.
Salibian, Ara A.
Bekisz, Jonathan M.
Choi, Mihye
Karp, Nolan S.
Thanik, Vishal D.
author_sort Frey, Jordan D.
collection PubMed
description Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction were prospectively identified and evaluated with an intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool consisting of 8 binary questions. Breast measurements and patient demographics were recorded. Reconstructions were then prospectively evaluated postoperatively for ischemic complications. Outcomes were analyzed with significance set at P values <0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent 45 immediate breast reconstruction. The majority of reconstructions were tissue expander based (64.4%) following therapeutic (62.2%) skin-sparing (93.3%) mastectomies. Average follow-up was 11.16 months. Sixteen reconstructions (35.6%) experienced an ischemic complication. The average total mastectomy flap ischemic risk score was 4.29. The correlation value of higher scores with increasing ischemic complications was 0.65. Reconstructions with scores greater than 5 had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P = 0.0025). Reconstructions with a score of >6 and >7 also had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P < 0.0001, each). The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative mastectomy flap compromise were 81.25% and 62.07%. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction were positively correlated with higher scores using a clinical intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool. Scores greater than 5 seem to be a threshold value at which ischemic complications are significantly greater. This simple, easy-to-implement intraoperative tool may assist plastic surgeons in assessing risk and optimizing outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72888832020-06-11 What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Frey, Jordan D. Salibian, Ara A. Bekisz, Jonathan M. Choi, Mihye Karp, Nolan S. Thanik, Vishal D. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction were prospectively identified and evaluated with an intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool consisting of 8 binary questions. Breast measurements and patient demographics were recorded. Reconstructions were then prospectively evaluated postoperatively for ischemic complications. Outcomes were analyzed with significance set at P values <0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent 45 immediate breast reconstruction. The majority of reconstructions were tissue expander based (64.4%) following therapeutic (62.2%) skin-sparing (93.3%) mastectomies. Average follow-up was 11.16 months. Sixteen reconstructions (35.6%) experienced an ischemic complication. The average total mastectomy flap ischemic risk score was 4.29. The correlation value of higher scores with increasing ischemic complications was 0.65. Reconstructions with scores greater than 5 had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P = 0.0025). Reconstructions with a score of >6 and >7 also had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P < 0.0001, each). The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative mastectomy flap compromise were 81.25% and 62.07%. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction were positively correlated with higher scores using a clinical intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool. Scores greater than 5 seem to be a threshold value at which ischemic complications are significantly greater. This simple, easy-to-implement intraoperative tool may assist plastic surgeons in assessing risk and optimizing outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7288883/ /pubmed/32537315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002585 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Frey, Jordan D.
Salibian, Ara A.
Bekisz, Jonathan M.
Choi, Mihye
Karp, Nolan S.
Thanik, Vishal D.
What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
title What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
title_full What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
title_short What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
title_sort what is in a number? evaluating a risk assessment tool in immediate breast reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002585
work_keys_str_mv AT freyjordand whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction
AT salibianaraa whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction
AT bekiszjonathanm whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction
AT choimihye whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction
AT karpnolans whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction
AT thanikvishald whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction