Cargando…
What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002585 |
_version_ | 1783545357639090176 |
---|---|
author | Frey, Jordan D. Salibian, Ara A. Bekisz, Jonathan M. Choi, Mihye Karp, Nolan S. Thanik, Vishal D. |
author_facet | Frey, Jordan D. Salibian, Ara A. Bekisz, Jonathan M. Choi, Mihye Karp, Nolan S. Thanik, Vishal D. |
author_sort | Frey, Jordan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction were prospectively identified and evaluated with an intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool consisting of 8 binary questions. Breast measurements and patient demographics were recorded. Reconstructions were then prospectively evaluated postoperatively for ischemic complications. Outcomes were analyzed with significance set at P values <0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent 45 immediate breast reconstruction. The majority of reconstructions were tissue expander based (64.4%) following therapeutic (62.2%) skin-sparing (93.3%) mastectomies. Average follow-up was 11.16 months. Sixteen reconstructions (35.6%) experienced an ischemic complication. The average total mastectomy flap ischemic risk score was 4.29. The correlation value of higher scores with increasing ischemic complications was 0.65. Reconstructions with scores greater than 5 had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P = 0.0025). Reconstructions with a score of >6 and >7 also had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P < 0.0001, each). The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative mastectomy flap compromise were 81.25% and 62.07%. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction were positively correlated with higher scores using a clinical intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool. Scores greater than 5 seem to be a threshold value at which ischemic complications are significantly greater. This simple, easy-to-implement intraoperative tool may assist plastic surgeons in assessing risk and optimizing outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7288883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72888832020-06-11 What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Frey, Jordan D. Salibian, Ara A. Bekisz, Jonathan M. Choi, Mihye Karp, Nolan S. Thanik, Vishal D. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction have devastating consequences; however, individual risk assessment remains challenging. We seek to develop an intraoperative assessment tool to assist in estimating risk of ischemic complications in immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction were prospectively identified and evaluated with an intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool consisting of 8 binary questions. Breast measurements and patient demographics were recorded. Reconstructions were then prospectively evaluated postoperatively for ischemic complications. Outcomes were analyzed with significance set at P values <0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent 45 immediate breast reconstruction. The majority of reconstructions were tissue expander based (64.4%) following therapeutic (62.2%) skin-sparing (93.3%) mastectomies. Average follow-up was 11.16 months. Sixteen reconstructions (35.6%) experienced an ischemic complication. The average total mastectomy flap ischemic risk score was 4.29. The correlation value of higher scores with increasing ischemic complications was 0.65. Reconstructions with scores greater than 5 had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P = 0.0025). Reconstructions with a score of >6 and >7 also had significantly higher rates of ischemic complications (P < 0.0001, each). The sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative mastectomy flap compromise were 81.25% and 62.07%. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic complications after immediate breast reconstruction were positively correlated with higher scores using a clinical intraoperative mastectomy flap ischemia risk assessment tool. Scores greater than 5 seem to be a threshold value at which ischemic complications are significantly greater. This simple, easy-to-implement intraoperative tool may assist plastic surgeons in assessing risk and optimizing outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7288883/ /pubmed/32537315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002585 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Frey, Jordan D. Salibian, Ara A. Bekisz, Jonathan M. Choi, Mihye Karp, Nolan S. Thanik, Vishal D. What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction |
title | What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction |
title_full | What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction |
title_short | What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction |
title_sort | what is in a number? evaluating a risk assessment tool in immediate breast reconstruction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freyjordand whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction AT salibianaraa whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction AT bekiszjonathanm whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction AT choimihye whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction AT karpnolans whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction AT thanikvishald whatisinanumberevaluatingariskassessmenttoolinimmediatebreastreconstruction |