Cargando…

The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction

Staged expander-based breast reconstruction represents the most common reconstructive modality in the United States. The introduction of a novel tissue expander with an integrated drain (Sientra AlloX2) holds promise to further improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent immediate exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momeni, Arash, Li, Alexander Y., Tsai, Jacqueline, Wan, Derrick, Karin, Mardi R., Wapnir, Irene L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002524
_version_ 1783545359986851840
author Momeni, Arash
Li, Alexander Y.
Tsai, Jacqueline
Wan, Derrick
Karin, Mardi R.
Wapnir, Irene L.
author_facet Momeni, Arash
Li, Alexander Y.
Tsai, Jacqueline
Wan, Derrick
Karin, Mardi R.
Wapnir, Irene L.
author_sort Momeni, Arash
collection PubMed
description Staged expander-based breast reconstruction represents the most common reconstructive modality in the United States. The introduction of a novel tissue expander with an integrated drain (Sientra AlloX2) holds promise to further improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent immediate expander-based pre-pectoral breast reconstruction were identified. Two cohorts were created, that is, patients who underwent placement of a conventional tissue expander [133MX (Allergan)] (Group 1) versus AlloX2 (Sientra) (Group 2). The study endpoint was successful completion of expansion with the objective being to investigate differences in outcome following expander placement. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent 99 breast reconstructions [Group 1: N = 24 (40 breasts) versus Group 2: N = 34 (59 breast)]. No differences were noted for age (P = 0.586), BMI (P = 0.109), history of radiation (P = 0.377), adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 1.00), and overall complication rate (P = 0.141). A significantly longer time to drain removal was noted in Group 1 (P < 0.001). All patients with postoperative infection in Group 1 required surgical treatment versus successful washout of the peri-prosthetic space via the AlloX2 drain port in 3 of 5 patients in Group 2 (P = 0.196). Furthermore, both cases of seroma in Group 1 required image-guided drainage versus in-office drainage via the AlloX2 drain port in 1 patient in Group 2 (P =0.333). CONCLUSION: The unique feature of the AlloX2 provides surgeons easy access to the peri-prosthetic space without altering any of the other characteristics of a tissue expander. This resulted in a reduced time to drain removal and facilitated management of postoperative seroma and infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7288893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72888932020-06-11 The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction Momeni, Arash Li, Alexander Y. Tsai, Jacqueline Wan, Derrick Karin, Mardi R. Wapnir, Irene L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Staged expander-based breast reconstruction represents the most common reconstructive modality in the United States. The introduction of a novel tissue expander with an integrated drain (Sientra AlloX2) holds promise to further improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent immediate expander-based pre-pectoral breast reconstruction were identified. Two cohorts were created, that is, patients who underwent placement of a conventional tissue expander [133MX (Allergan)] (Group 1) versus AlloX2 (Sientra) (Group 2). The study endpoint was successful completion of expansion with the objective being to investigate differences in outcome following expander placement. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent 99 breast reconstructions [Group 1: N = 24 (40 breasts) versus Group 2: N = 34 (59 breast)]. No differences were noted for age (P = 0.586), BMI (P = 0.109), history of radiation (P = 0.377), adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 1.00), and overall complication rate (P = 0.141). A significantly longer time to drain removal was noted in Group 1 (P < 0.001). All patients with postoperative infection in Group 1 required surgical treatment versus successful washout of the peri-prosthetic space via the AlloX2 drain port in 3 of 5 patients in Group 2 (P = 0.196). Furthermore, both cases of seroma in Group 1 required image-guided drainage versus in-office drainage via the AlloX2 drain port in 1 patient in Group 2 (P =0.333). CONCLUSION: The unique feature of the AlloX2 provides surgeons easy access to the peri-prosthetic space without altering any of the other characteristics of a tissue expander. This resulted in a reduced time to drain removal and facilitated management of postoperative seroma and infection. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7288893/ /pubmed/32537287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002524 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Momeni, Arash
Li, Alexander Y.
Tsai, Jacqueline
Wan, Derrick
Karin, Mardi R.
Wapnir, Irene L.
The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction
title The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction
title_full The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction
title_short The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction
title_sort impact of device innovation on clinical outcomes in expander-based breast reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7288893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002524
work_keys_str_mv AT momeniarash theimpactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT lialexandery theimpactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT tsaijacqueline theimpactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT wanderrick theimpactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT karinmardir theimpactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT wapnirirenel theimpactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT momeniarash impactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT lialexandery impactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT tsaijacqueline impactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT wanderrick impactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT karinmardir impactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction
AT wapnirirenel impactofdeviceinnovationonclinicaloutcomesinexpanderbasedbreastreconstruction