Cargando…
Genome size evolution in the Archaea
What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Portland Press Ltd.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33525826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180021 |
_version_ | 1783545391669575680 |
---|---|
author | Kellner, Siri Spang, Anja Offre, Pierre Szöllo˝si, Gergely J. Petitjean, Celine Williams, Tom A. |
author_facet | Kellner, Siri Spang, Anja Offre, Pierre Szöllo˝si, Gergely J. Petitjean, Celine Williams, Tom A. |
author_sort | Kellner, Siri |
collection | PubMed |
description | What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes also apply to the archaeal domain. Although Bacteria and Archaea share a common prokaryotic genome architecture, the extant diversity of Bacteria appears to be much higher than that of Archaea. Compared with Archaea, Bacteria also show much greater genome-level specialisation to specific ecological niches, including parasitism and endosymbiosis. The reasons for these differences in long-term diversification rates are unclear, but might be related to fundamental differences in informational processing machineries and cell biological features that may favour archaeal diversification in harsher or more energy-limited environments. Finally, phylogenomic analyses suggest that the first Archaea were anaerobic autotrophs that evolved on the early Earth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7289037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Portland Press Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72890372020-06-18 Genome size evolution in the Archaea Kellner, Siri Spang, Anja Offre, Pierre Szöllo˝si, Gergely J. Petitjean, Celine Williams, Tom A. Emerg Top Life Sci Review Articles What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes also apply to the archaeal domain. Although Bacteria and Archaea share a common prokaryotic genome architecture, the extant diversity of Bacteria appears to be much higher than that of Archaea. Compared with Archaea, Bacteria also show much greater genome-level specialisation to specific ecological niches, including parasitism and endosymbiosis. The reasons for these differences in long-term diversification rates are unclear, but might be related to fundamental differences in informational processing machineries and cell biological features that may favour archaeal diversification in harsher or more energy-limited environments. Finally, phylogenomic analyses suggest that the first Archaea were anaerobic autotrophs that evolved on the early Earth. Portland Press Ltd. 2018-12-12 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7289037/ /pubmed/33525826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180021 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and the Royal Society of Biology and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Kellner, Siri Spang, Anja Offre, Pierre Szöllo˝si, Gergely J. Petitjean, Celine Williams, Tom A. Genome size evolution in the Archaea |
title | Genome size evolution in the Archaea |
title_full | Genome size evolution in the Archaea |
title_fullStr | Genome size evolution in the Archaea |
title_full_unstemmed | Genome size evolution in the Archaea |
title_short | Genome size evolution in the Archaea |
title_sort | genome size evolution in the archaea |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33525826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kellnersiri genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea AT spanganja genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea AT offrepierre genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea AT szollosigergelyj genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea AT petitjeanceline genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea AT williamstoma genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea |