Cargando…

Genome size evolution in the Archaea

What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kellner, Siri, Spang, Anja, Offre, Pierre, Szöllo˝si, Gergely J., Petitjean, Celine, Williams, Tom A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33525826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180021
_version_ 1783545391669575680
author Kellner, Siri
Spang, Anja
Offre, Pierre
Szöllo˝si, Gergely J.
Petitjean, Celine
Williams, Tom A.
author_facet Kellner, Siri
Spang, Anja
Offre, Pierre
Szöllo˝si, Gergely J.
Petitjean, Celine
Williams, Tom A.
author_sort Kellner, Siri
collection PubMed
description What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes also apply to the archaeal domain. Although Bacteria and Archaea share a common prokaryotic genome architecture, the extant diversity of Bacteria appears to be much higher than that of Archaea. Compared with Archaea, Bacteria also show much greater genome-level specialisation to specific ecological niches, including parasitism and endosymbiosis. The reasons for these differences in long-term diversification rates are unclear, but might be related to fundamental differences in informational processing machineries and cell biological features that may favour archaeal diversification in harsher or more energy-limited environments. Finally, phylogenomic analyses suggest that the first Archaea were anaerobic autotrophs that evolved on the early Earth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7289037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72890372020-06-18 Genome size evolution in the Archaea Kellner, Siri Spang, Anja Offre, Pierre Szöllo˝si, Gergely J. Petitjean, Celine Williams, Tom A. Emerg Top Life Sci Review Articles What determines variation in genome size, gene content and genetic diversity at the broadest scales across the tree of life? Much of the existing work contrasts eukaryotes with prokaryotes, the latter represented mainly by Bacteria. But any general theory of genome evolution must also account for the Archaea, a diverse and ecologically important group of prokaryotes that represent one of the primary domains of cellular life. Here, we survey the extant diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, and ask whether the general principles of genome evolution deduced from the study of Bacteria and eukaryotes also apply to the archaeal domain. Although Bacteria and Archaea share a common prokaryotic genome architecture, the extant diversity of Bacteria appears to be much higher than that of Archaea. Compared with Archaea, Bacteria also show much greater genome-level specialisation to specific ecological niches, including parasitism and endosymbiosis. The reasons for these differences in long-term diversification rates are unclear, but might be related to fundamental differences in informational processing machineries and cell biological features that may favour archaeal diversification in harsher or more energy-limited environments. Finally, phylogenomic analyses suggest that the first Archaea were anaerobic autotrophs that evolved on the early Earth. Portland Press Ltd. 2018-12-12 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7289037/ /pubmed/33525826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180021 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and the Royal Society of Biology and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kellner, Siri
Spang, Anja
Offre, Pierre
Szöllo˝si, Gergely J.
Petitjean, Celine
Williams, Tom A.
Genome size evolution in the Archaea
title Genome size evolution in the Archaea
title_full Genome size evolution in the Archaea
title_fullStr Genome size evolution in the Archaea
title_full_unstemmed Genome size evolution in the Archaea
title_short Genome size evolution in the Archaea
title_sort genome size evolution in the archaea
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33525826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20180021
work_keys_str_mv AT kellnersiri genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea
AT spanganja genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea
AT offrepierre genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea
AT szollosigergelyj genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea
AT petitjeanceline genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea
AT williamstoma genomesizeevolutioninthearchaea