Cargando…
Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
BACKGROUND: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256 |
_version_ | 1783545410870050816 |
---|---|
author | Murawa, Michal Fryzowicz, Anna Kabacinski, Jaroslaw Jurga, Jakub Gorwa, Joanna Galli, Manuela Zago, Matteo |
author_facet | Murawa, Michal Fryzowicz, Anna Kabacinski, Jaroslaw Jurga, Jakub Gorwa, Joanna Galli, Manuela Zago, Matteo |
author_sort | Murawa, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity and maximal angles within single homogeneous group between the HBBS and LBBS for 60% one repetition maximum (1RM), 65% 1RM and 70% 1RM. METHODS: Twelve healthy men (age 24.3 ± 2.8 years, height 178.8 ± 5.6 cm, body mass 88.3 ± 11.5 kg), experienced in powerlifting performed HBBS and LBBS with comparable external loads equal 60% 1RM, 65% 1RM, and 70% 1RM. Electromyography (EMG) signals of muscle groups were synchronously recorded alongside kinematic data (joints angle) by means of a motion capture system. RESULTS: EMG activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than in HBBS for all selected muscles (60% 1RM and 65% 1RM) (p < 0.05). All examined muscles were more activated during concentric phase of the squat cycle (p < 0.05). In the concentric phase, significant differences between the loads were generally not observed between just 5% 1RM change in load level for LBBS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed significant differences in muscles activation between both squat techniques. Muscle activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than HBBS. The differences are crucial for posterior muscle chain during eccentric phase of squat cycle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7289144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72891442020-06-17 Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat Murawa, Michal Fryzowicz, Anna Kabacinski, Jaroslaw Jurga, Jakub Gorwa, Joanna Galli, Manuela Zago, Matteo PeerJ Bioengineering BACKGROUND: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity and maximal angles within single homogeneous group between the HBBS and LBBS for 60% one repetition maximum (1RM), 65% 1RM and 70% 1RM. METHODS: Twelve healthy men (age 24.3 ± 2.8 years, height 178.8 ± 5.6 cm, body mass 88.3 ± 11.5 kg), experienced in powerlifting performed HBBS and LBBS with comparable external loads equal 60% 1RM, 65% 1RM, and 70% 1RM. Electromyography (EMG) signals of muscle groups were synchronously recorded alongside kinematic data (joints angle) by means of a motion capture system. RESULTS: EMG activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than in HBBS for all selected muscles (60% 1RM and 65% 1RM) (p < 0.05). All examined muscles were more activated during concentric phase of the squat cycle (p < 0.05). In the concentric phase, significant differences between the loads were generally not observed between just 5% 1RM change in load level for LBBS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed significant differences in muscles activation between both squat techniques. Muscle activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than HBBS. The differences are crucial for posterior muscle chain during eccentric phase of squat cycle. PeerJ Inc. 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7289144/ /pubmed/32551198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256 Text en ©2020 Murawa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering Murawa, Michal Fryzowicz, Anna Kabacinski, Jaroslaw Jurga, Jakub Gorwa, Joanna Galli, Manuela Zago, Matteo Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
title | Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
title_full | Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
title_fullStr | Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
title_full_unstemmed | Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
title_short | Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
title_sort | muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat |
topic | Bioengineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murawamichal muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat AT fryzowiczanna muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat AT kabacinskijaroslaw muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat AT jurgajakub muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat AT gorwajoanna muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat AT gallimanuela muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat AT zagomatteo muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat |