Cargando…

Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat

BACKGROUND: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murawa, Michal, Fryzowicz, Anna, Kabacinski, Jaroslaw, Jurga, Jakub, Gorwa, Joanna, Galli, Manuela, Zago, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551198
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256
_version_ 1783545410870050816
author Murawa, Michal
Fryzowicz, Anna
Kabacinski, Jaroslaw
Jurga, Jakub
Gorwa, Joanna
Galli, Manuela
Zago, Matteo
author_facet Murawa, Michal
Fryzowicz, Anna
Kabacinski, Jaroslaw
Jurga, Jakub
Gorwa, Joanna
Galli, Manuela
Zago, Matteo
author_sort Murawa, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity and maximal angles within single homogeneous group between the HBBS and LBBS for 60% one repetition maximum (1RM), 65% 1RM and 70% 1RM. METHODS: Twelve healthy men (age 24.3  ± 2.8 years, height 178.8  ± 5.6 cm, body mass 88.3  ± 11.5 kg), experienced in powerlifting performed HBBS and LBBS with comparable external loads equal 60% 1RM, 65% 1RM, and 70% 1RM. Electromyography (EMG) signals of muscle groups were synchronously recorded alongside kinematic data (joints angle) by means of a motion capture system. RESULTS: EMG activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than in HBBS for all selected muscles (60% 1RM and 65% 1RM) (p < 0.05). All examined muscles were more activated during concentric phase of the squat cycle (p < 0.05). In the concentric phase, significant differences between the loads were generally not observed between just 5% 1RM change in load level for LBBS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed significant differences in muscles activation between both squat techniques. Muscle activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than HBBS. The differences are crucial for posterior muscle chain during eccentric phase of squat cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7289144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72891442020-06-17 Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat Murawa, Michal Fryzowicz, Anna Kabacinski, Jaroslaw Jurga, Jakub Gorwa, Joanna Galli, Manuela Zago, Matteo PeerJ Bioengineering BACKGROUND: Differences in the muscular activity between the high-bar back squat (HBBS) and the low-bar back squat (LBBS) on the same representative group of experienced powerlifters are still scarcely investigated. The main purpose of the study was to compare the normalized bioelectrical activity and maximal angles within single homogeneous group between the HBBS and LBBS for 60% one repetition maximum (1RM), 65% 1RM and 70% 1RM. METHODS: Twelve healthy men (age 24.3  ± 2.8 years, height 178.8  ± 5.6 cm, body mass 88.3  ± 11.5 kg), experienced in powerlifting performed HBBS and LBBS with comparable external loads equal 60% 1RM, 65% 1RM, and 70% 1RM. Electromyography (EMG) signals of muscle groups were synchronously recorded alongside kinematic data (joints angle) by means of a motion capture system. RESULTS: EMG activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than in HBBS for all selected muscles (60% 1RM and 65% 1RM) (p < 0.05). All examined muscles were more activated during concentric phase of the squat cycle (p < 0.05). In the concentric phase, significant differences between the loads were generally not observed between just 5% 1RM change in load level for LBBS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed significant differences in muscles activation between both squat techniques. Muscle activity during eccentric phase of squat motion were significantly higher during LBBS than HBBS. The differences are crucial for posterior muscle chain during eccentric phase of squat cycle. PeerJ Inc. 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7289144/ /pubmed/32551198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256 Text en ©2020 Murawa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioengineering
Murawa, Michal
Fryzowicz, Anna
Kabacinski, Jaroslaw
Jurga, Jakub
Gorwa, Joanna
Galli, Manuela
Zago, Matteo
Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
title Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
title_full Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
title_fullStr Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
title_full_unstemmed Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
title_short Muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
title_sort muscle activation varies between high-bar and low-bar back squat
topic Bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551198
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9256
work_keys_str_mv AT murawamichal muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat
AT fryzowiczanna muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat
AT kabacinskijaroslaw muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat
AT jurgajakub muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat
AT gorwajoanna muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat
AT gallimanuela muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat
AT zagomatteo muscleactivationvariesbetweenhighbarandlowbarbacksquat