Cargando…

Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support

We evaluated the intraobserver variability of physicians aided by a computerized decision-support system for treatment response assessment (CDSS-T) to identify patients who show complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer, and the effects of the intraobserver variability on phys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadjiiski, Lubomir M., Cha, Kenny H., Cohan, Richard H., Chan, Heang-Ping, Caoili, Elaine M., Davenport, Matthew S., Samala, Ravi K., Weizer, Alon Z., Alva, Ajjai, Kirova-Nedyalkova, Galina, Shampain, Kimberly, Meyer, Nathaniel, Barkmeier, Daniel, Woolen, Sean A, Shankar, Prasad R., Francis, Isaac R., Palmbos, Phillip L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548296
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2020.00013
_version_ 1783545425559552000
author Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
Cha, Kenny H.
Cohan, Richard H.
Chan, Heang-Ping
Caoili, Elaine M.
Davenport, Matthew S.
Samala, Ravi K.
Weizer, Alon Z.
Alva, Ajjai
Kirova-Nedyalkova, Galina
Shampain, Kimberly
Meyer, Nathaniel
Barkmeier, Daniel
Woolen, Sean A
Shankar, Prasad R.
Francis, Isaac R.
Palmbos, Phillip L.
author_facet Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
Cha, Kenny H.
Cohan, Richard H.
Chan, Heang-Ping
Caoili, Elaine M.
Davenport, Matthew S.
Samala, Ravi K.
Weizer, Alon Z.
Alva, Ajjai
Kirova-Nedyalkova, Galina
Shampain, Kimberly
Meyer, Nathaniel
Barkmeier, Daniel
Woolen, Sean A
Shankar, Prasad R.
Francis, Isaac R.
Palmbos, Phillip L.
author_sort Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the intraobserver variability of physicians aided by a computerized decision-support system for treatment response assessment (CDSS-T) to identify patients who show complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer, and the effects of the intraobserver variability on physicians' assessment accuracy. A CDSS-T tool was developed that uses a combination of deep learning neural network and radiomic features from computed tomography (CT) scans to detect bladder cancers that have fully responded to neoadjuvant treatment. Pre- and postchemotherapy CT scans of 157 bladder cancers from 123 patients were collected. In a multireader, multicase observer study, physician-observers estimated the likelihood of pathologic T0 disease by viewing paired pre/posttreatment CT scans placed side by side on an in-house-developed graphical user interface. Five abdominal radiologists, 4 diagnostic radiology residents, 2 oncologists, and 1 urologist participated as observers. They first provided an estimate without CDSS-T and then with CDSS-T. A subset of cases was evaluated twice to study the intraobserver variability and its effects on observer consistency. The mean areas under the curves for assessment of pathologic T0 disease were 0.85 for CDSS-T alone, 0.76 for physicians without CDSS-T and improved to 0.80 for physicians with CDSS-T (P = .001) in the original evaluation, and 0.78 for physicians without CDSS-T and improved to 0.81 for physicians with CDSS-T (P = .010) in the repeated evaluation. The intraobserver variability was significantly reduced with CDSS-T (P < .0001). The CDSS-T can significantly reduce physicians' variability and improve their accuracy for identifying complete response of muscle-invasive bladder cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7289252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Grapho Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72892522020-06-15 Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support Hadjiiski, Lubomir M. Cha, Kenny H. Cohan, Richard H. Chan, Heang-Ping Caoili, Elaine M. Davenport, Matthew S. Samala, Ravi K. Weizer, Alon Z. Alva, Ajjai Kirova-Nedyalkova, Galina Shampain, Kimberly Meyer, Nathaniel Barkmeier, Daniel Woolen, Sean A Shankar, Prasad R. Francis, Isaac R. Palmbos, Phillip L. Tomography Research Articles We evaluated the intraobserver variability of physicians aided by a computerized decision-support system for treatment response assessment (CDSS-T) to identify patients who show complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer, and the effects of the intraobserver variability on physicians' assessment accuracy. A CDSS-T tool was developed that uses a combination of deep learning neural network and radiomic features from computed tomography (CT) scans to detect bladder cancers that have fully responded to neoadjuvant treatment. Pre- and postchemotherapy CT scans of 157 bladder cancers from 123 patients were collected. In a multireader, multicase observer study, physician-observers estimated the likelihood of pathologic T0 disease by viewing paired pre/posttreatment CT scans placed side by side on an in-house-developed graphical user interface. Five abdominal radiologists, 4 diagnostic radiology residents, 2 oncologists, and 1 urologist participated as observers. They first provided an estimate without CDSS-T and then with CDSS-T. A subset of cases was evaluated twice to study the intraobserver variability and its effects on observer consistency. The mean areas under the curves for assessment of pathologic T0 disease were 0.85 for CDSS-T alone, 0.76 for physicians without CDSS-T and improved to 0.80 for physicians with CDSS-T (P = .001) in the original evaluation, and 0.78 for physicians without CDSS-T and improved to 0.81 for physicians with CDSS-T (P = .010) in the repeated evaluation. The intraobserver variability was significantly reduced with CDSS-T (P < .0001). The CDSS-T can significantly reduce physicians' variability and improve their accuracy for identifying complete response of muscle-invasive bladder cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Grapho Publications, LLC 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7289252/ /pubmed/32548296 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2020.00013 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
Cha, Kenny H.
Cohan, Richard H.
Chan, Heang-Ping
Caoili, Elaine M.
Davenport, Matthew S.
Samala, Ravi K.
Weizer, Alon Z.
Alva, Ajjai
Kirova-Nedyalkova, Galina
Shampain, Kimberly
Meyer, Nathaniel
Barkmeier, Daniel
Woolen, Sean A
Shankar, Prasad R.
Francis, Isaac R.
Palmbos, Phillip L.
Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support
title Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support
title_full Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support
title_fullStr Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support
title_full_unstemmed Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support
title_short Intraobserver Variability in Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment With and Without Computerized Decision Support
title_sort intraobserver variability in bladder cancer treatment response assessment with and without computerized decision support
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548296
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2020.00013
work_keys_str_mv AT hadjiiskilubomirm intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT chakennyh intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT cohanrichardh intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT chanheangping intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT caoilielainem intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT davenportmatthews intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT samalaravik intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT weizeralonz intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT alvaajjai intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT kirovanedyalkovagalina intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT shampainkimberly intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT meyernathaniel intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT barkmeierdaniel intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT woolenseana intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT shankarprasadr intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT francisisaacr intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport
AT palmbosphillipl intraobservervariabilityinbladdercancertreatmentresponseassessmentwithandwithoutcomputerizeddecisionsupport