Cargando…
Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
BACKGROUND: Activity trackers such as the Fitbit Charge 2 enable users and researchers to monitor physical activity in daily life, which could be beneficial for changing behaviour. However, the accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 2 in a free-living environment is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234426 |
_version_ | 1783545444928847872 |
---|---|
author | Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K. Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele Frederiksen, Peder Horgan, Graham O’Driscoll, Ruairi Palmeira, António L. Scott, Sarah E. Stubbs, James Heitmann, Berit L. Larsen, Sofus C. |
author_facet | Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K. Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele Frederiksen, Peder Horgan, Graham O’Driscoll, Ruairi Palmeira, António L. Scott, Sarah E. Stubbs, James Heitmann, Berit L. Larsen, Sofus C. |
author_sort | Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Activity trackers such as the Fitbit Charge 2 enable users and researchers to monitor physical activity in daily life, which could be beneficial for changing behaviour. However, the accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 2 in a free-living environment is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between Fitbit Charge 2 and ActiGraph GT3X for the estimation of steps, energy expenditure, time in sedentary behaviour, and light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity under free-living conditions, and further examine to what extent placing the ActiGraph on the wrist as opposed to the hip would affect the findings. METHODS: 41 adults (n = 10 males, n = 31 females) were asked to wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device and two ActiGraph GT3X devices (one on the hip and one on the wrist) for seven consecutive days and fill out a log of wear times. Agreement was assessed through Bland-Altman plots combined with multilevel analysis. RESULTS: The Fitbit measured 1,492 steps/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (limits of agreement [LoA] = -2,250; 5,234), while for sedentary time, it measured 25 min/day less (LoA = -137; 87). Both Bland-Altman plots showed fixed bias. For time in light physical activity, the Fitbit measured 59 min/day more (LoA = -52;169). For time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, the Fitbit measured 31 min/day less (LoA = -132; 71) and for activity energy expenditure it measured 408 kcal/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (LoA = -385; 1,200). For the two latter outputs, the plots indicated proportional bias. Similar or more pronounced discrepancies, mostly in opposite direction, appeared when comparing to the wrist-worn ActiGraph. CONCLUSION: Moderate to substantial differences between devices were found for most outputs, which could be due to differences in algorithms. Caution should be taken if replacing one device with another and when comparing results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7289355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72893552020-06-15 Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K. Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele Frederiksen, Peder Horgan, Graham O’Driscoll, Ruairi Palmeira, António L. Scott, Sarah E. Stubbs, James Heitmann, Berit L. Larsen, Sofus C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Activity trackers such as the Fitbit Charge 2 enable users and researchers to monitor physical activity in daily life, which could be beneficial for changing behaviour. However, the accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 2 in a free-living environment is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between Fitbit Charge 2 and ActiGraph GT3X for the estimation of steps, energy expenditure, time in sedentary behaviour, and light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity under free-living conditions, and further examine to what extent placing the ActiGraph on the wrist as opposed to the hip would affect the findings. METHODS: 41 adults (n = 10 males, n = 31 females) were asked to wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device and two ActiGraph GT3X devices (one on the hip and one on the wrist) for seven consecutive days and fill out a log of wear times. Agreement was assessed through Bland-Altman plots combined with multilevel analysis. RESULTS: The Fitbit measured 1,492 steps/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (limits of agreement [LoA] = -2,250; 5,234), while for sedentary time, it measured 25 min/day less (LoA = -137; 87). Both Bland-Altman plots showed fixed bias. For time in light physical activity, the Fitbit measured 59 min/day more (LoA = -52;169). For time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, the Fitbit measured 31 min/day less (LoA = -132; 71) and for activity energy expenditure it measured 408 kcal/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (LoA = -385; 1,200). For the two latter outputs, the plots indicated proportional bias. Similar or more pronounced discrepancies, mostly in opposite direction, appeared when comparing to the wrist-worn ActiGraph. CONCLUSION: Moderate to substantial differences between devices were found for most outputs, which could be due to differences in algorithms. Caution should be taken if replacing one device with another and when comparing results. Public Library of Science 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7289355/ /pubmed/32525912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234426 Text en © 2020 Mikkelsen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K. Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele Frederiksen, Peder Horgan, Graham O’Driscoll, Ruairi Palmeira, António L. Scott, Sarah E. Stubbs, James Heitmann, Berit L. Larsen, Sofus C. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X |
title | Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X |
title_full | Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X |
title_fullStr | Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X |
title_short | Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X |
title_sort | estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: a comparative study between fitbit charge 2 and actigraph gt3x |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikkelsenmarielouisek estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT bergbeckhoffgabriele estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT frederiksenpeder estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT horgangraham estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT odriscollruairi estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT palmeiraantoniol estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT scottsarahe estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT stubbsjames estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT heitmannberitl estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x AT larsensofusc estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x |