Cargando…

Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X

BACKGROUND: Activity trackers such as the Fitbit Charge 2 enable users and researchers to monitor physical activity in daily life, which could be beneficial for changing behaviour. However, the accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 2 in a free-living environment is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K., Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele, Frederiksen, Peder, Horgan, Graham, O’Driscoll, Ruairi, Palmeira, António L., Scott, Sarah E., Stubbs, James, Heitmann, Berit L., Larsen, Sofus C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234426
_version_ 1783545444928847872
author Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K.
Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele
Frederiksen, Peder
Horgan, Graham
O’Driscoll, Ruairi
Palmeira, António L.
Scott, Sarah E.
Stubbs, James
Heitmann, Berit L.
Larsen, Sofus C.
author_facet Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K.
Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele
Frederiksen, Peder
Horgan, Graham
O’Driscoll, Ruairi
Palmeira, António L.
Scott, Sarah E.
Stubbs, James
Heitmann, Berit L.
Larsen, Sofus C.
author_sort Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Activity trackers such as the Fitbit Charge 2 enable users and researchers to monitor physical activity in daily life, which could be beneficial for changing behaviour. However, the accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 2 in a free-living environment is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between Fitbit Charge 2 and ActiGraph GT3X for the estimation of steps, energy expenditure, time in sedentary behaviour, and light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity under free-living conditions, and further examine to what extent placing the ActiGraph on the wrist as opposed to the hip would affect the findings. METHODS: 41 adults (n = 10 males, n = 31 females) were asked to wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device and two ActiGraph GT3X devices (one on the hip and one on the wrist) for seven consecutive days and fill out a log of wear times. Agreement was assessed through Bland-Altman plots combined with multilevel analysis. RESULTS: The Fitbit measured 1,492 steps/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (limits of agreement [LoA] = -2,250; 5,234), while for sedentary time, it measured 25 min/day less (LoA = -137; 87). Both Bland-Altman plots showed fixed bias. For time in light physical activity, the Fitbit measured 59 min/day more (LoA = -52;169). For time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, the Fitbit measured 31 min/day less (LoA = -132; 71) and for activity energy expenditure it measured 408 kcal/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (LoA = -385; 1,200). For the two latter outputs, the plots indicated proportional bias. Similar or more pronounced discrepancies, mostly in opposite direction, appeared when comparing to the wrist-worn ActiGraph. CONCLUSION: Moderate to substantial differences between devices were found for most outputs, which could be due to differences in algorithms. Caution should be taken if replacing one device with another and when comparing results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7289355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72893552020-06-15 Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K. Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele Frederiksen, Peder Horgan, Graham O’Driscoll, Ruairi Palmeira, António L. Scott, Sarah E. Stubbs, James Heitmann, Berit L. Larsen, Sofus C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Activity trackers such as the Fitbit Charge 2 enable users and researchers to monitor physical activity in daily life, which could be beneficial for changing behaviour. However, the accuracy of the Fitbit Charge 2 in a free-living environment is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between Fitbit Charge 2 and ActiGraph GT3X for the estimation of steps, energy expenditure, time in sedentary behaviour, and light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity under free-living conditions, and further examine to what extent placing the ActiGraph on the wrist as opposed to the hip would affect the findings. METHODS: 41 adults (n = 10 males, n = 31 females) were asked to wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device and two ActiGraph GT3X devices (one on the hip and one on the wrist) for seven consecutive days and fill out a log of wear times. Agreement was assessed through Bland-Altman plots combined with multilevel analysis. RESULTS: The Fitbit measured 1,492 steps/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (limits of agreement [LoA] = -2,250; 5,234), while for sedentary time, it measured 25 min/day less (LoA = -137; 87). Both Bland-Altman plots showed fixed bias. For time in light physical activity, the Fitbit measured 59 min/day more (LoA = -52;169). For time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, the Fitbit measured 31 min/day less (LoA = -132; 71) and for activity energy expenditure it measured 408 kcal/day more than the hip-worn ActiGraph (LoA = -385; 1,200). For the two latter outputs, the plots indicated proportional bias. Similar or more pronounced discrepancies, mostly in opposite direction, appeared when comparing to the wrist-worn ActiGraph. CONCLUSION: Moderate to substantial differences between devices were found for most outputs, which could be due to differences in algorithms. Caution should be taken if replacing one device with another and when comparing results. Public Library of Science 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7289355/ /pubmed/32525912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234426 Text en © 2020 Mikkelsen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K.
Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele
Frederiksen, Peder
Horgan, Graham
O’Driscoll, Ruairi
Palmeira, António L.
Scott, Sarah E.
Stubbs, James
Heitmann, Berit L.
Larsen, Sofus C.
Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
title Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
title_full Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
title_fullStr Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
title_full_unstemmed Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
title_short Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
title_sort estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: a comparative study between fitbit charge 2 and actigraph gt3x
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234426
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkelsenmarielouisek estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT bergbeckhoffgabriele estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT frederiksenpeder estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT horgangraham estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT odriscollruairi estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT palmeiraantoniol estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT scottsarahe estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT stubbsjames estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT heitmannberitl estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x
AT larsensofusc estimatingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinafreelivingenvironmentacomparativestudybetweenfitbitcharge2andactigraphgt3x