Cargando…

Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)

The hyline tribe Lophyohylini includes 87 species of treefrogs, of which cytogenetics aspects have been studied in less than 20% of them. In order to evaluate the evolution of some of its chromosome characters (NOR position, C-bands, and DAPI/CMA(3) bands), we studied the karyotypes of 21 lophyohyli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suárez, Pablo, Ferro, Juan M., Nagamachi, Cleusa Y., Cardozo, Dario E., Blasco-Zúñiga, Ailin, Silva, Jéssica B., Marciano-JR, Euvaldo, Costa, Marco A., Orrico, Victor G. D., Solé, Mirco, Roberto, Igor J., Rivera, Miryan, Wiley, John E., Faivovich, Julián, Baldo, Diego, Pieczarka, Julio C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234331
_version_ 1783545455856058368
author Suárez, Pablo
Ferro, Juan M.
Nagamachi, Cleusa Y.
Cardozo, Dario E.
Blasco-Zúñiga, Ailin
Silva, Jéssica B.
Marciano-JR, Euvaldo
Costa, Marco A.
Orrico, Victor G. D.
Solé, Mirco
Roberto, Igor J.
Rivera, Miryan
Wiley, John E.
Faivovich, Julián
Baldo, Diego
Pieczarka, Julio C.
author_facet Suárez, Pablo
Ferro, Juan M.
Nagamachi, Cleusa Y.
Cardozo, Dario E.
Blasco-Zúñiga, Ailin
Silva, Jéssica B.
Marciano-JR, Euvaldo
Costa, Marco A.
Orrico, Victor G. D.
Solé, Mirco
Roberto, Igor J.
Rivera, Miryan
Wiley, John E.
Faivovich, Julián
Baldo, Diego
Pieczarka, Julio C.
author_sort Suárez, Pablo
collection PubMed
description The hyline tribe Lophyohylini includes 87 species of treefrogs, of which cytogenetics aspects have been studied in less than 20% of them. In order to evaluate the evolution of some of its chromosome characters (NOR position, C-bands, and DAPI/CMA(3) bands), we studied the karyotypes of 21 lophyohylines, 16 of them for the first time, and analyzed them in a phylogenetic context. Most species showed similar karyotypes regarding chromosome number (2n = 24) and morphology (FN = 48), excepting Phyllodytes edelmoi and Osteocephalus buckleyi with 2n = 22 (FN = 44) and 2n = 28 (FN = 50), respectively. The NOR location was variable among species and provided valuable phylogenetic information. This marker was located in pair 11 in all species of Trachycephalus, Itapotihyla langsdorffii, and Nyctimantis arapapa, representing the plesiomorphic condition of Lophyohylini. Besides, other apomorphic states were recovered for the clades comprising N. rugiceps and N. siemersi (NOR in pair 5), and Dryaderces pearsoni, Osteocephalus, and Osteopilus (NOR in pair 9). Phyllodytes presented variation for NORs position; they were in pair 2 in P. edelmoi, pair 7 in P. melanomystax, and pair 8 in P. gyrinaethes and P. praeceptor. Polymorphisms in size, number, and activity of this marker were observed for N. siemersi, Osteocephalus fuscifacies, and some species of Trachycephalus. Remarkably, in N. siemersi NORs were detected on a single chromosome in the two specimens studied by this technique, raising the question of how this complex polymorphism is maintained. Interstitial telomeric sequences were found in P. edelmoi, P. melanomystax, and Osteocephalus buckleyi, and their presence seems to be not related to the chromosome reorganization events. Finally, some species showed spontaneous rearrangements, possibly as a consequence of an uncommon phenomenon in anuran cytogenetics: the presence of fragile sites or secondary constrictions not associated with NORs. We propose that this rare feature would have played an important role in the evolution of this group of frogs. From the evidence obtained in this and previous studies, we conclude that Lophyohylini presents a complex chromosome evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7289402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72894022020-06-15 Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae) Suárez, Pablo Ferro, Juan M. Nagamachi, Cleusa Y. Cardozo, Dario E. Blasco-Zúñiga, Ailin Silva, Jéssica B. Marciano-JR, Euvaldo Costa, Marco A. Orrico, Victor G. D. Solé, Mirco Roberto, Igor J. Rivera, Miryan Wiley, John E. Faivovich, Julián Baldo, Diego Pieczarka, Julio C. PLoS One Research Article The hyline tribe Lophyohylini includes 87 species of treefrogs, of which cytogenetics aspects have been studied in less than 20% of them. In order to evaluate the evolution of some of its chromosome characters (NOR position, C-bands, and DAPI/CMA(3) bands), we studied the karyotypes of 21 lophyohylines, 16 of them for the first time, and analyzed them in a phylogenetic context. Most species showed similar karyotypes regarding chromosome number (2n = 24) and morphology (FN = 48), excepting Phyllodytes edelmoi and Osteocephalus buckleyi with 2n = 22 (FN = 44) and 2n = 28 (FN = 50), respectively. The NOR location was variable among species and provided valuable phylogenetic information. This marker was located in pair 11 in all species of Trachycephalus, Itapotihyla langsdorffii, and Nyctimantis arapapa, representing the plesiomorphic condition of Lophyohylini. Besides, other apomorphic states were recovered for the clades comprising N. rugiceps and N. siemersi (NOR in pair 5), and Dryaderces pearsoni, Osteocephalus, and Osteopilus (NOR in pair 9). Phyllodytes presented variation for NORs position; they were in pair 2 in P. edelmoi, pair 7 in P. melanomystax, and pair 8 in P. gyrinaethes and P. praeceptor. Polymorphisms in size, number, and activity of this marker were observed for N. siemersi, Osteocephalus fuscifacies, and some species of Trachycephalus. Remarkably, in N. siemersi NORs were detected on a single chromosome in the two specimens studied by this technique, raising the question of how this complex polymorphism is maintained. Interstitial telomeric sequences were found in P. edelmoi, P. melanomystax, and Osteocephalus buckleyi, and their presence seems to be not related to the chromosome reorganization events. Finally, some species showed spontaneous rearrangements, possibly as a consequence of an uncommon phenomenon in anuran cytogenetics: the presence of fragile sites or secondary constrictions not associated with NORs. We propose that this rare feature would have played an important role in the evolution of this group of frogs. From the evidence obtained in this and previous studies, we conclude that Lophyohylini presents a complex chromosome evolution. Public Library of Science 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7289402/ /pubmed/32525943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234331 Text en © 2020 Suárez et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suárez, Pablo
Ferro, Juan M.
Nagamachi, Cleusa Y.
Cardozo, Dario E.
Blasco-Zúñiga, Ailin
Silva, Jéssica B.
Marciano-JR, Euvaldo
Costa, Marco A.
Orrico, Victor G. D.
Solé, Mirco
Roberto, Igor J.
Rivera, Miryan
Wiley, John E.
Faivovich, Julián
Baldo, Diego
Pieczarka, Julio C.
Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)
title Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)
title_full Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)
title_fullStr Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)
title_full_unstemmed Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)
title_short Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae)
title_sort chromosome evolution in lophyohylini (amphibia, anura, hylinae)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234331
work_keys_str_mv AT suarezpablo chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT ferrojuanm chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT nagamachicleusay chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT cardozodarioe chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT blascozunigaailin chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT silvajessicab chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT marcianojreuvaldo chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT costamarcoa chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT orricovictorgd chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT solemirco chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT robertoigorj chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT riveramiryan chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT wileyjohne chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT faivovichjulian chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT baldodiego chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae
AT pieczarkajulioc chromosomeevolutioninlophyohyliniamphibiaanurahylinae