Cargando…

Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum

The current context of malaria elimination requires urgent development and implementation of highly sensitive and specific methods for prompt detection and treatment of malaria parasites. Such methods should overcome current delays in diagnosis, allow the detection of low-density infections and addr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barazorda, Keare A., Salas, Carola J., Bishop, Danett K., Lucchi, Naomi, Valdivia, Hugo O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234263
_version_ 1783545456340500480
author Barazorda, Keare A.
Salas, Carola J.
Bishop, Danett K.
Lucchi, Naomi
Valdivia, Hugo O.
author_facet Barazorda, Keare A.
Salas, Carola J.
Bishop, Danett K.
Lucchi, Naomi
Valdivia, Hugo O.
author_sort Barazorda, Keare A.
collection PubMed
description The current context of malaria elimination requires urgent development and implementation of highly sensitive and specific methods for prompt detection and treatment of malaria parasites. Such methods should overcome current delays in diagnosis, allow the detection of low-density infections and address the difficulties in accessing remote endemic communities. In this study, we assessed the performance of the RealAmp and malachite-green loop mediated isothermal amplification (MG-LAMP) methodologies, using microscopy and conventional nested-PCR as reference techniques. Both LAMP techniques were performed for Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum, and P. vivax identification using 136 whole blood samples collected from three communities located in the Peruvian Amazon basin. Turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were estimated and compared to that of microscopy and nested-PCR. Using nested-PCR as reference standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all methods. RealAmp had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85–96.5%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 89.1–100%) for species detection; sensitivity and specificity of MG-LAMP were 94% (95% CI: 87.5–97.8%) and 100% (89.1–100%), respectively. Whereas microscopy showed 88.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 80.2–93.7%) and 100% specificity (95%: 89.1–100%). The turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were lower compared to those associated with nested-PCR but higher than those associated with microscopy. The two LAMP assays were shown to be more sensitive and simple to implement than microscopy. Both LAMP methodologies could be used as large-scale screening tests, but the MG-LAMP assay uses a simple, portable heat-block while the RealAmp requires a RealAmp machine or a real-time PCR machine. This makes the MG-LAMP an appropriate choice for malaria surveillance studies in endemic sites. Use of LAMP tests in active case detection of Plasmodium parasites could help to detect positive malaria cases early.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7289405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72894052020-06-15 Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum Barazorda, Keare A. Salas, Carola J. Bishop, Danett K. Lucchi, Naomi Valdivia, Hugo O. PLoS One Research Article The current context of malaria elimination requires urgent development and implementation of highly sensitive and specific methods for prompt detection and treatment of malaria parasites. Such methods should overcome current delays in diagnosis, allow the detection of low-density infections and address the difficulties in accessing remote endemic communities. In this study, we assessed the performance of the RealAmp and malachite-green loop mediated isothermal amplification (MG-LAMP) methodologies, using microscopy and conventional nested-PCR as reference techniques. Both LAMP techniques were performed for Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum, and P. vivax identification using 136 whole blood samples collected from three communities located in the Peruvian Amazon basin. Turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were estimated and compared to that of microscopy and nested-PCR. Using nested-PCR as reference standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all methods. RealAmp had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85–96.5%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 89.1–100%) for species detection; sensitivity and specificity of MG-LAMP were 94% (95% CI: 87.5–97.8%) and 100% (89.1–100%), respectively. Whereas microscopy showed 88.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 80.2–93.7%) and 100% specificity (95%: 89.1–100%). The turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were lower compared to those associated with nested-PCR but higher than those associated with microscopy. The two LAMP assays were shown to be more sensitive and simple to implement than microscopy. Both LAMP methodologies could be used as large-scale screening tests, but the MG-LAMP assay uses a simple, portable heat-block while the RealAmp requires a RealAmp machine or a real-time PCR machine. This makes the MG-LAMP an appropriate choice for malaria surveillance studies in endemic sites. Use of LAMP tests in active case detection of Plasmodium parasites could help to detect positive malaria cases early. Public Library of Science 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7289405/ /pubmed/32525900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234263 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barazorda, Keare A.
Salas, Carola J.
Bishop, Danett K.
Lucchi, Naomi
Valdivia, Hugo O.
Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
title Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
title_full Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
title_fullStr Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
title_short Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
title_sort comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of plasmodium vivax and p. falciparum
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32525900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234263
work_keys_str_mv AT barazordakearea comparisonofrealtimeandmalachitegreenbasedloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassaysforthedetectionofplasmodiumvivaxandpfalciparum
AT salascarolaj comparisonofrealtimeandmalachitegreenbasedloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassaysforthedetectionofplasmodiumvivaxandpfalciparum
AT bishopdanettk comparisonofrealtimeandmalachitegreenbasedloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassaysforthedetectionofplasmodiumvivaxandpfalciparum
AT lucchinaomi comparisonofrealtimeandmalachitegreenbasedloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassaysforthedetectionofplasmodiumvivaxandpfalciparum
AT valdiviahugoo comparisonofrealtimeandmalachitegreenbasedloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassaysforthedetectionofplasmodiumvivaxandpfalciparum