Cargando…
Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka
BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008. Previous studies show a gap in the notification of leishmaniasis. The purpose of the present study was to determine the Knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical officers regarding leishmaniasis. METHODS: A cross-sectional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09066-w |
_version_ | 1783545593588613120 |
---|---|
author | Hewawasam, Chandana Weerakoon, Hema S. Thilakan, Vyshnavi Lelwala, Tishni Prasanka, Kalana Rathnayaka, A. S. Gamage, Shanika Agampodi, Suneth |
author_facet | Hewawasam, Chandana Weerakoon, Hema S. Thilakan, Vyshnavi Lelwala, Tishni Prasanka, Kalana Rathnayaka, A. S. Gamage, Shanika Agampodi, Suneth |
author_sort | Hewawasam, Chandana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008. Previous studies show a gap in the notification of leishmaniasis. The purpose of the present study was to determine the Knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical officers regarding leishmaniasis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Anuradhapura district which reported the highest case load of leishmaniasis. Medical officers from public and private health care institutes in the area filled a self-administered questionnaire in the presence of the investigators. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight (188) medical officers completed the questionnaire. Of them, 95.7% were aware of leishmaniasis as a parasitic infection and 84.7% correctly identified Leishmania donovani as the causative organism in Sri Lanka. From the respondents, 181 (96.8%) knew that the vector of leishmaniasis is sand fly. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported as the most prevalent form of leishmaniasis in the country by 176 (94.1%). Nearly half of the respondents (98, 54.1%) were aware of the fact that the Anuradhapura district has the highest disease burden. Many of them had the idea that leishmaniasis is an emerging disease (155, 84.3%,) and early diagnosis is important in controlling the disease (163, 89.1%). Although about three fourth (123, 73.7%,) of the participants mentioned that leishmaniasis should be notified at first clinical suspicion, only 74 (42.5%) were aware that it is a legal requirement. Some medical officers (39, 22%) believed that the current notification system in the country is not effective. Unavailability of notification forms (60, 36.8%) heavy workload (85, 50.3%) and inadequate supportive staff (55, 35.1%) were reported as barriers for timely notification. Even though 105 (58.0%) of medical officers had suspected leishmaniasis during the last 8 years period only 35 (19.4%) had notified. CONCLUSIONS: Even though more than 90% of the participants had good theoretical knowledge about leishmaniasis; notification of leishmaniasis is considerably inadequate. This study emphasizes the need for greater efforts to improve the notification of leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7290071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72900712020-06-12 Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka Hewawasam, Chandana Weerakoon, Hema S. Thilakan, Vyshnavi Lelwala, Tishni Prasanka, Kalana Rathnayaka, A. S. Gamage, Shanika Agampodi, Suneth BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008. Previous studies show a gap in the notification of leishmaniasis. The purpose of the present study was to determine the Knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical officers regarding leishmaniasis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Anuradhapura district which reported the highest case load of leishmaniasis. Medical officers from public and private health care institutes in the area filled a self-administered questionnaire in the presence of the investigators. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight (188) medical officers completed the questionnaire. Of them, 95.7% were aware of leishmaniasis as a parasitic infection and 84.7% correctly identified Leishmania donovani as the causative organism in Sri Lanka. From the respondents, 181 (96.8%) knew that the vector of leishmaniasis is sand fly. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported as the most prevalent form of leishmaniasis in the country by 176 (94.1%). Nearly half of the respondents (98, 54.1%) were aware of the fact that the Anuradhapura district has the highest disease burden. Many of them had the idea that leishmaniasis is an emerging disease (155, 84.3%,) and early diagnosis is important in controlling the disease (163, 89.1%). Although about three fourth (123, 73.7%,) of the participants mentioned that leishmaniasis should be notified at first clinical suspicion, only 74 (42.5%) were aware that it is a legal requirement. Some medical officers (39, 22%) believed that the current notification system in the country is not effective. Unavailability of notification forms (60, 36.8%) heavy workload (85, 50.3%) and inadequate supportive staff (55, 35.1%) were reported as barriers for timely notification. Even though 105 (58.0%) of medical officers had suspected leishmaniasis during the last 8 years period only 35 (19.4%) had notified. CONCLUSIONS: Even though more than 90% of the participants had good theoretical knowledge about leishmaniasis; notification of leishmaniasis is considerably inadequate. This study emphasizes the need for greater efforts to improve the notification of leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka. BioMed Central 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7290071/ /pubmed/32532244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09066-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hewawasam, Chandana Weerakoon, Hema S. Thilakan, Vyshnavi Lelwala, Tishni Prasanka, Kalana Rathnayaka, A. S. Gamage, Shanika Agampodi, Suneth Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka |
title | Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka |
title_full | Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka |
title_fullStr | Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka |
title_full_unstemmed | Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka |
title_short | Is leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from an endemic district, Sri Lanka |
title_sort | is leishmaniasis adequately notified in sri lanka? a survey among doctors from an endemic district, sri lanka |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09066-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hewawasamchandana isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT weerakoonhemas isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT thilakanvyshnavi isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT lelwalatishni isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT prasankakalana isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT rathnayakaas isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT gamageshanika isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka AT agampodisuneth isleishmaniasisadequatelynotifiedinsrilankaasurveyamongdoctorsfromanendemicdistrictsrilanka |