Cargando…

Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib has been recommended as the first-line treatment and shown to prolong the median overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a growing number of earlier studies showed the application of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Lei, Zhang, Qian, Geng, Jie, Li, Songlun, Zhao, Shoujie, Zhang, Xiangnan, Hu, Jie, Feng, Dayun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566610
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.71
_version_ 1783545703465746432
author Liu, Lei
Zhang, Qian
Geng, Jie
Li, Songlun
Zhao, Shoujie
Zhang, Xiangnan
Hu, Jie
Feng, Dayun
author_facet Liu, Lei
Zhang, Qian
Geng, Jie
Li, Songlun
Zhao, Shoujie
Zhang, Xiangnan
Hu, Jie
Feng, Dayun
author_sort Liu, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sorafenib has been recommended as the first-line treatment and shown to prolong the median overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a growing number of earlier studies showed the application of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plus sorafenib in patients diagnosed at the advanced-stage HCC. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of RFA plus sorafenib versus sorafenib alone and identify prognostic factors related to OS for BCLC stage C patients with PS 1 but without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. METHODS: A total of 276 consecutive patients in BCLC stage C with PS 1 but without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread were enrolled in this retrospective study. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the log-rank test examined the statistical differences between the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS: Based on the Kaplan-Meier curves, patients treated with RFA plus sorafenib showed better OS than those undergoing sorafenib, with respective OS at 1, 3 and 5 years (84.0%, 43.1%, 22.8% vs. 55.6%, 29.6%, 4.8%, Log-rank P<0.001). The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, tumor number, treatment method, albumin, bilirubin, and the Child-Pugh score were associated with OS. According to the subgroups analyses based on the tumor size and tumor number, there were significant differences in OS among overall subsets except in patients with tumor number ≥4 between RFA plus sorafenib and sorafenib therapy. CONCLUSIONS: RFA plus sorafenib provided better prognostic performance than sorafenib, which should be suggested as an alternative treatment modality compared with sorafenib for BCLC stage C patients with PS 1 but without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7290551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72905512020-06-19 Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates Liu, Lei Zhang, Qian Geng, Jie Li, Songlun Zhao, Shoujie Zhang, Xiangnan Hu, Jie Feng, Dayun Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Sorafenib has been recommended as the first-line treatment and shown to prolong the median overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a growing number of earlier studies showed the application of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plus sorafenib in patients diagnosed at the advanced-stage HCC. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of RFA plus sorafenib versus sorafenib alone and identify prognostic factors related to OS for BCLC stage C patients with PS 1 but without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. METHODS: A total of 276 consecutive patients in BCLC stage C with PS 1 but without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread were enrolled in this retrospective study. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the log-rank test examined the statistical differences between the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS: Based on the Kaplan-Meier curves, patients treated with RFA plus sorafenib showed better OS than those undergoing sorafenib, with respective OS at 1, 3 and 5 years (84.0%, 43.1%, 22.8% vs. 55.6%, 29.6%, 4.8%, Log-rank P<0.001). The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, tumor number, treatment method, albumin, bilirubin, and the Child-Pugh score were associated with OS. According to the subgroups analyses based on the tumor size and tumor number, there were significant differences in OS among overall subsets except in patients with tumor number ≥4 between RFA plus sorafenib and sorafenib therapy. CONCLUSIONS: RFA plus sorafenib provided better prognostic performance than sorafenib, which should be suggested as an alternative treatment modality compared with sorafenib for BCLC stage C patients with PS 1 but without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. AME Publishing Company 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7290551/ /pubmed/32566610 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.71 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Lei
Zhang, Qian
Geng, Jie
Li, Songlun
Zhao, Shoujie
Zhang, Xiangnan
Hu, Jie
Feng, Dayun
Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
title Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
title_full Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
title_fullStr Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
title_short Comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ECOG performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
title_sort comparison of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib or sorafenib alone in patients with ecog performance score 1: identifying optimal candidates
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566610
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.71
work_keys_str_mv AT liulei comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT zhangqian comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT gengjie comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT lisonglun comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT zhaoshoujie comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT zhangxiangnan comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT hujie comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates
AT fengdayun comparisonofradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithsorafeniborsorafenibaloneinpatientswithecogperformancescore1identifyingoptimalcandidates