Cargando…

Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome

This study aims to evaluate the natural history, disease progression, and outcomes in dichorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) according to different diagnostic criteria and time of onset. Dichorionic twins seen from the first trimester were included. sFGR was classified acco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonakopoulos, Nikolaos, Pateisky, Petra, Liu, Becky, Kalafat, Erkan, Thilaganathan, Baskaran, Khalil, Asma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051404
_version_ 1783545766816514048
author Antonakopoulos, Nikolaos
Pateisky, Petra
Liu, Becky
Kalafat, Erkan
Thilaganathan, Baskaran
Khalil, Asma
author_facet Antonakopoulos, Nikolaos
Pateisky, Petra
Liu, Becky
Kalafat, Erkan
Thilaganathan, Baskaran
Khalil, Asma
author_sort Antonakopoulos, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description This study aims to evaluate the natural history, disease progression, and outcomes in dichorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) according to different diagnostic criteria and time of onset. Dichorionic twins seen from the first trimester were included. sFGR was classified according to the Delphi consensus, and was compared to the outcomes of those classified by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) diagnostic criteria. Early sFGR occurred before 32-weeks, and late sFGR after 32-weeks. Disease progression, neonatal outcomes such as gestation at delivery, birthweight, neonatal unit (NNU) admission, and morbidities were compared. One-hundred twenty-three of 1053 dichorionic twins had sFGR, where 8.4% were classified as early sFGR, and 3.3% were late sFGR. Disease progression was seen in 36%, with a longer progression time (5 vs. 1 week) and higher progression rate (40% vs. 26%) in early sFGR. Perinatal death was significantly higher in the sFGR than the non-sFGR group (24 vs. 16 per 1000 births, p = 0.018), and those with early sFGR had more NNU admissions than late sFGR (p = 0.005). The ISUOG diagnostic criteria yielded a higher number of sFGR than the Delphi criteria, but similar outcomes. sFGR have worse perinatal outcomes, with early onset being more prevalent. Use of the Delphi diagnostic criteria can reduce over-diagnosis of sFGR and avoid unnecessary intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7290824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72908242020-06-17 Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome Antonakopoulos, Nikolaos Pateisky, Petra Liu, Becky Kalafat, Erkan Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma J Clin Med Article This study aims to evaluate the natural history, disease progression, and outcomes in dichorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) according to different diagnostic criteria and time of onset. Dichorionic twins seen from the first trimester were included. sFGR was classified according to the Delphi consensus, and was compared to the outcomes of those classified by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) diagnostic criteria. Early sFGR occurred before 32-weeks, and late sFGR after 32-weeks. Disease progression, neonatal outcomes such as gestation at delivery, birthweight, neonatal unit (NNU) admission, and morbidities were compared. One-hundred twenty-three of 1053 dichorionic twins had sFGR, where 8.4% were classified as early sFGR, and 3.3% were late sFGR. Disease progression was seen in 36%, with a longer progression time (5 vs. 1 week) and higher progression rate (40% vs. 26%) in early sFGR. Perinatal death was significantly higher in the sFGR than the non-sFGR group (24 vs. 16 per 1000 births, p = 0.018), and those with early sFGR had more NNU admissions than late sFGR (p = 0.005). The ISUOG diagnostic criteria yielded a higher number of sFGR than the Delphi criteria, but similar outcomes. sFGR have worse perinatal outcomes, with early onset being more prevalent. Use of the Delphi diagnostic criteria can reduce over-diagnosis of sFGR and avoid unnecessary intervention. MDPI 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7290824/ /pubmed/32397539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051404 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Antonakopoulos, Nikolaos
Pateisky, Petra
Liu, Becky
Kalafat, Erkan
Thilaganathan, Baskaran
Khalil, Asma
Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome
title Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome
title_full Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome
title_fullStr Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome
title_short Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome
title_sort selective fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies: diagnosis, natural history, and perinatal outcome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051404
work_keys_str_mv AT antonakopoulosnikolaos selectivefetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnanciesdiagnosisnaturalhistoryandperinataloutcome
AT pateiskypetra selectivefetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnanciesdiagnosisnaturalhistoryandperinataloutcome
AT liubecky selectivefetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnanciesdiagnosisnaturalhistoryandperinataloutcome
AT kalafaterkan selectivefetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnanciesdiagnosisnaturalhistoryandperinataloutcome
AT thilaganathanbaskaran selectivefetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnanciesdiagnosisnaturalhistoryandperinataloutcome
AT khalilasma selectivefetalgrowthrestrictionindichorionictwinpregnanciesdiagnosisnaturalhistoryandperinataloutcome