Cargando…

Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing

Identification and characterization of viral genomes in vectors including ticks and mosquitoes positive for pathogens of great public health concern using metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) has challenges. One such challenge is the ability to efficiently recover viral RNA which is typical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akello, Joyce Odeke, Leib, Stephen L., Engler, Olivier, Beuret, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12050562
_version_ 1783545774345289728
author Akello, Joyce Odeke
Leib, Stephen L.
Engler, Olivier
Beuret, Christian
author_facet Akello, Joyce Odeke
Leib, Stephen L.
Engler, Olivier
Beuret, Christian
author_sort Akello, Joyce Odeke
collection PubMed
description Identification and characterization of viral genomes in vectors including ticks and mosquitoes positive for pathogens of great public health concern using metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) has challenges. One such challenge is the ability to efficiently recover viral RNA which is typically dependent on sample processing. We evaluated the quantitative effect of six different extraction methods in recovering viral RNA in vectors using negative tick homogenates spiked with serial dilutions of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and surrogate Langat virus (LGTV). Evaluation was performed using qPCR and mNGS. Sensitivity and proof of concept of optimal method was tested using naturally positive TBEV tick homogenates and positive dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus mosquito homogenates. The amount of observed viral genome copies, percentage of mapped reads, and genome coverage varied among different extractions methods. The developed Method 5 gave a 120.8-, 46-, 2.5-, 22.4-, and 9.9-fold increase in the number of viral reads mapping to the expected pathogen in comparison to Method 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, respectively. Our developed Method 5 termed ROVIV (Recovery of Viruses in Vectors) greatly improved viral RNA recovery and identification in vectors using mNGS. Therefore, it may be a more sensitive method for use in arbovirus surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7290855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72908552020-06-17 Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing Akello, Joyce Odeke Leib, Stephen L. Engler, Olivier Beuret, Christian Viruses Article Identification and characterization of viral genomes in vectors including ticks and mosquitoes positive for pathogens of great public health concern using metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) has challenges. One such challenge is the ability to efficiently recover viral RNA which is typically dependent on sample processing. We evaluated the quantitative effect of six different extraction methods in recovering viral RNA in vectors using negative tick homogenates spiked with serial dilutions of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and surrogate Langat virus (LGTV). Evaluation was performed using qPCR and mNGS. Sensitivity and proof of concept of optimal method was tested using naturally positive TBEV tick homogenates and positive dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus mosquito homogenates. The amount of observed viral genome copies, percentage of mapped reads, and genome coverage varied among different extractions methods. The developed Method 5 gave a 120.8-, 46-, 2.5-, 22.4-, and 9.9-fold increase in the number of viral reads mapping to the expected pathogen in comparison to Method 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, respectively. Our developed Method 5 termed ROVIV (Recovery of Viruses in Vectors) greatly improved viral RNA recovery and identification in vectors using mNGS. Therefore, it may be a more sensitive method for use in arbovirus surveillance. MDPI 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7290855/ /pubmed/32438629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12050562 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Akello, Joyce Odeke
Leib, Stephen L.
Engler, Olivier
Beuret, Christian
Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing
title Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing
title_full Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing
title_fullStr Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing
title_short Evaluation of Viral RNA Recovery Methods in Vectors by Metagenomic Sequencing
title_sort evaluation of viral rna recovery methods in vectors by metagenomic sequencing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32438629
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12050562
work_keys_str_mv AT akellojoyceodeke evaluationofviralrnarecoverymethodsinvectorsbymetagenomicsequencing
AT leibstephenl evaluationofviralrnarecoverymethodsinvectorsbymetagenomicsequencing
AT englerolivier evaluationofviralrnarecoverymethodsinvectorsbymetagenomicsequencing
AT beuretchristian evaluationofviralrnarecoverymethodsinvectorsbymetagenomicsequencing