Cargando…

A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay

Many detection methods for phycotoxins, bioactive compounds produced by harmful algae, focus on one compound or a class of related compounds. Multiple harmful algal species often co-occur in the environment, however, emphasizing the need to analyze for the presence of multiple groups of marine and f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onofrio, Michelle D., Mallet, Claude R., Place, Allen R., Smith, Juliette L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32414148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050322
_version_ 1783545804654379008
author Onofrio, Michelle D.
Mallet, Claude R.
Place, Allen R.
Smith, Juliette L.
author_facet Onofrio, Michelle D.
Mallet, Claude R.
Place, Allen R.
Smith, Juliette L.
author_sort Onofrio, Michelle D.
collection PubMed
description Many detection methods for phycotoxins, bioactive compounds produced by harmful algae, focus on one compound or a class of related compounds. Multiple harmful algal species often co-occur in the environment, however, emphasizing the need to analyze for the presence of multiple groups of marine and freshwater phycotoxins in environmental samples, e.g., extracts from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT). Two methods were developed to screen for 13 phycotoxins (microcystin-RR, -LR, -YR, azaspiracid-1, -2, karlotoxin 3, goniodomin A, brevetoxin-2, yessotoxin, pectenotoxin-2, dinophysistoxin-1, -2, and okadaic acid) in organic SPATT extracts using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) equipped with a trapping dimension (trap) and at-column dilution (ACD). The performance of each compound under 36 combinations of chromatographic conditions was characterized, and two final methods, acidic and basic, were selected based on peak shapes, signal intensities, resolution, and the separation in time of positive and negative MS ionization modes. Injection volumes of up to 1 mL were possible through trap/ACD technology, resulting in limits of detection between 0.001 and 0.05 µg/L across the analytes. Benefits highlighted in this study, beyond the improved detection limits and co-detection of multiple toxin groups, include the ability to inject samples of 100% organic solvent, ensuring analyte stability and streamlining workflow through the elimination of laborious sample preparation steps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7290987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72909872020-06-17 A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay Onofrio, Michelle D. Mallet, Claude R. Place, Allen R. Smith, Juliette L. Toxins (Basel) Article Many detection methods for phycotoxins, bioactive compounds produced by harmful algae, focus on one compound or a class of related compounds. Multiple harmful algal species often co-occur in the environment, however, emphasizing the need to analyze for the presence of multiple groups of marine and freshwater phycotoxins in environmental samples, e.g., extracts from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT). Two methods were developed to screen for 13 phycotoxins (microcystin-RR, -LR, -YR, azaspiracid-1, -2, karlotoxin 3, goniodomin A, brevetoxin-2, yessotoxin, pectenotoxin-2, dinophysistoxin-1, -2, and okadaic acid) in organic SPATT extracts using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) equipped with a trapping dimension (trap) and at-column dilution (ACD). The performance of each compound under 36 combinations of chromatographic conditions was characterized, and two final methods, acidic and basic, were selected based on peak shapes, signal intensities, resolution, and the separation in time of positive and negative MS ionization modes. Injection volumes of up to 1 mL were possible through trap/ACD technology, resulting in limits of detection between 0.001 and 0.05 µg/L across the analytes. Benefits highlighted in this study, beyond the improved detection limits and co-detection of multiple toxin groups, include the ability to inject samples of 100% organic solvent, ensuring analyte stability and streamlining workflow through the elimination of laborious sample preparation steps. MDPI 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7290987/ /pubmed/32414148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050322 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Onofrio, Michelle D.
Mallet, Claude R.
Place, Allen R.
Smith, Juliette L.
A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
title A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
title_full A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
title_fullStr A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
title_full_unstemmed A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
title_short A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
title_sort screening tool for the direct analysis of marine and freshwater phycotoxins in organic spatt extracts from the chesapeake bay
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32414148
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050322
work_keys_str_mv AT onofriomichelled ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT malletclauder ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT placeallenr ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT smithjuliettel ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT onofriomichelled screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT malletclauder screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT placeallenr screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay
AT smithjuliettel screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay