Cargando…
A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay
Many detection methods for phycotoxins, bioactive compounds produced by harmful algae, focus on one compound or a class of related compounds. Multiple harmful algal species often co-occur in the environment, however, emphasizing the need to analyze for the presence of multiple groups of marine and f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32414148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050322 |
_version_ | 1783545804654379008 |
---|---|
author | Onofrio, Michelle D. Mallet, Claude R. Place, Allen R. Smith, Juliette L. |
author_facet | Onofrio, Michelle D. Mallet, Claude R. Place, Allen R. Smith, Juliette L. |
author_sort | Onofrio, Michelle D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many detection methods for phycotoxins, bioactive compounds produced by harmful algae, focus on one compound or a class of related compounds. Multiple harmful algal species often co-occur in the environment, however, emphasizing the need to analyze for the presence of multiple groups of marine and freshwater phycotoxins in environmental samples, e.g., extracts from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT). Two methods were developed to screen for 13 phycotoxins (microcystin-RR, -LR, -YR, azaspiracid-1, -2, karlotoxin 3, goniodomin A, brevetoxin-2, yessotoxin, pectenotoxin-2, dinophysistoxin-1, -2, and okadaic acid) in organic SPATT extracts using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) equipped with a trapping dimension (trap) and at-column dilution (ACD). The performance of each compound under 36 combinations of chromatographic conditions was characterized, and two final methods, acidic and basic, were selected based on peak shapes, signal intensities, resolution, and the separation in time of positive and negative MS ionization modes. Injection volumes of up to 1 mL were possible through trap/ACD technology, resulting in limits of detection between 0.001 and 0.05 µg/L across the analytes. Benefits highlighted in this study, beyond the improved detection limits and co-detection of multiple toxin groups, include the ability to inject samples of 100% organic solvent, ensuring analyte stability and streamlining workflow through the elimination of laborious sample preparation steps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7290987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72909872020-06-17 A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay Onofrio, Michelle D. Mallet, Claude R. Place, Allen R. Smith, Juliette L. Toxins (Basel) Article Many detection methods for phycotoxins, bioactive compounds produced by harmful algae, focus on one compound or a class of related compounds. Multiple harmful algal species often co-occur in the environment, however, emphasizing the need to analyze for the presence of multiple groups of marine and freshwater phycotoxins in environmental samples, e.g., extracts from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT). Two methods were developed to screen for 13 phycotoxins (microcystin-RR, -LR, -YR, azaspiracid-1, -2, karlotoxin 3, goniodomin A, brevetoxin-2, yessotoxin, pectenotoxin-2, dinophysistoxin-1, -2, and okadaic acid) in organic SPATT extracts using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) equipped with a trapping dimension (trap) and at-column dilution (ACD). The performance of each compound under 36 combinations of chromatographic conditions was characterized, and two final methods, acidic and basic, were selected based on peak shapes, signal intensities, resolution, and the separation in time of positive and negative MS ionization modes. Injection volumes of up to 1 mL were possible through trap/ACD technology, resulting in limits of detection between 0.001 and 0.05 µg/L across the analytes. Benefits highlighted in this study, beyond the improved detection limits and co-detection of multiple toxin groups, include the ability to inject samples of 100% organic solvent, ensuring analyte stability and streamlining workflow through the elimination of laborious sample preparation steps. MDPI 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7290987/ /pubmed/32414148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050322 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Onofrio, Michelle D. Mallet, Claude R. Place, Allen R. Smith, Juliette L. A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay |
title | A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_full | A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_fullStr | A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_full_unstemmed | A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_short | A Screening Tool for the Direct Analysis of Marine and Freshwater Phycotoxins in Organic SPATT Extracts from the Chesapeake Bay |
title_sort | screening tool for the direct analysis of marine and freshwater phycotoxins in organic spatt extracts from the chesapeake bay |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7290987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32414148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins12050322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onofriomichelled ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT malletclauder ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT placeallenr ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT smithjuliettel ascreeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT onofriomichelled screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT malletclauder screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT placeallenr screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay AT smithjuliettel screeningtoolforthedirectanalysisofmarineandfreshwaterphycotoxinsinorganicspattextractsfromthechesapeakebay |