Cargando…
Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289 |
_version_ | 1783545888104251392 |
---|---|
author | Gavara, Aitor Vacas, Sandra Navarro, Ismael Primo, Jaime Navarro-Llopis, Vicente |
author_facet | Gavara, Aitor Vacas, Sandra Navarro, Ismael Primo, Jaime Navarro-Llopis, Vicente |
author_sort | Gavara, Aitor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data about field airborne pheromone concentration based on air samplings and sensitive chromatographic-spectroscopic methods. Samplings were performed in fields treated with passive dispensers or aerosol devices at different moments throughout the crop cycle to study how they act and how the disruption is triggered. Moreover, pheromone adsorption and releasing capacity of vine leaves were studied to elucidate their role in the disruption. Although both types of dispensers were effective in limiting the damage inflicted by EGVM, they performed differently and provided different airborne pheromone concentration profiles. Results also proved that leaves were able to adsorb and release part of the airborne pheromone acting as subsequent and additional pheromone sources. This fact could explain the different concentration profiles. Moreover, our results suggest that lower pheromone emission than that of the current passive dispensers still could provide an adequate performance in the field. Competitive mechanisms involved in MD using both dispensers, the dynamics of the airborne pheromone throughout the time and the importance of the canopy are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7291346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72913462020-06-17 Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana Gavara, Aitor Vacas, Sandra Navarro, Ismael Primo, Jaime Navarro-Llopis, Vicente Insects Article Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data about field airborne pheromone concentration based on air samplings and sensitive chromatographic-spectroscopic methods. Samplings were performed in fields treated with passive dispensers or aerosol devices at different moments throughout the crop cycle to study how they act and how the disruption is triggered. Moreover, pheromone adsorption and releasing capacity of vine leaves were studied to elucidate their role in the disruption. Although both types of dispensers were effective in limiting the damage inflicted by EGVM, they performed differently and provided different airborne pheromone concentration profiles. Results also proved that leaves were able to adsorb and release part of the airborne pheromone acting as subsequent and additional pheromone sources. This fact could explain the different concentration profiles. Moreover, our results suggest that lower pheromone emission than that of the current passive dispensers still could provide an adequate performance in the field. Competitive mechanisms involved in MD using both dispensers, the dynamics of the airborne pheromone throughout the time and the importance of the canopy are discussed. MDPI 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7291346/ /pubmed/32397370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gavara, Aitor Vacas, Sandra Navarro, Ismael Primo, Jaime Navarro-Llopis, Vicente Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana |
title | Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana |
title_full | Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana |
title_fullStr | Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana |
title_full_unstemmed | Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana |
title_short | Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana |
title_sort | airborne pheromone quantification in treated vineyards with different mating disruption dispensers against lobesia botrana |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavaraaitor airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana AT vacassandra airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana AT navarroismael airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana AT primojaime airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana AT navarrollopisvicente airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana |