Cargando…

Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana

Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavara, Aitor, Vacas, Sandra, Navarro, Ismael, Primo, Jaime, Navarro-Llopis, Vicente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289
_version_ 1783545888104251392
author Gavara, Aitor
Vacas, Sandra
Navarro, Ismael
Primo, Jaime
Navarro-Llopis, Vicente
author_facet Gavara, Aitor
Vacas, Sandra
Navarro, Ismael
Primo, Jaime
Navarro-Llopis, Vicente
author_sort Gavara, Aitor
collection PubMed
description Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data about field airborne pheromone concentration based on air samplings and sensitive chromatographic-spectroscopic methods. Samplings were performed in fields treated with passive dispensers or aerosol devices at different moments throughout the crop cycle to study how they act and how the disruption is triggered. Moreover, pheromone adsorption and releasing capacity of vine leaves were studied to elucidate their role in the disruption. Although both types of dispensers were effective in limiting the damage inflicted by EGVM, they performed differently and provided different airborne pheromone concentration profiles. Results also proved that leaves were able to adsorb and release part of the airborne pheromone acting as subsequent and additional pheromone sources. This fact could explain the different concentration profiles. Moreover, our results suggest that lower pheromone emission than that of the current passive dispensers still could provide an adequate performance in the field. Competitive mechanisms involved in MD using both dispensers, the dynamics of the airborne pheromone throughout the time and the importance of the canopy are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7291346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72913462020-06-17 Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana Gavara, Aitor Vacas, Sandra Navarro, Ismael Primo, Jaime Navarro-Llopis, Vicente Insects Article Mating disruption (MD) is widely used against the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by installing passive dispensers or aerosol devices. The present work reports a new sampling and quantification methodology to obtain absolute data about field airborne pheromone concentration based on air samplings and sensitive chromatographic-spectroscopic methods. Samplings were performed in fields treated with passive dispensers or aerosol devices at different moments throughout the crop cycle to study how they act and how the disruption is triggered. Moreover, pheromone adsorption and releasing capacity of vine leaves were studied to elucidate their role in the disruption. Although both types of dispensers were effective in limiting the damage inflicted by EGVM, they performed differently and provided different airborne pheromone concentration profiles. Results also proved that leaves were able to adsorb and release part of the airborne pheromone acting as subsequent and additional pheromone sources. This fact could explain the different concentration profiles. Moreover, our results suggest that lower pheromone emission than that of the current passive dispensers still could provide an adequate performance in the field. Competitive mechanisms involved in MD using both dispensers, the dynamics of the airborne pheromone throughout the time and the importance of the canopy are discussed. MDPI 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7291346/ /pubmed/32397370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gavara, Aitor
Vacas, Sandra
Navarro, Ismael
Primo, Jaime
Navarro-Llopis, Vicente
Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
title Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
title_full Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
title_fullStr Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
title_full_unstemmed Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
title_short Airborne Pheromone Quantification in Treated Vineyards with Different Mating Disruption Dispensers against Lobesia botrana
title_sort airborne pheromone quantification in treated vineyards with different mating disruption dispensers against lobesia botrana
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11050289
work_keys_str_mv AT gavaraaitor airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana
AT vacassandra airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana
AT navarroismael airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana
AT primojaime airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana
AT navarrollopisvicente airbornepheromonequantificationintreatedvineyardswithdifferentmatingdisruptiondispensersagainstlobesiabotrana