Cargando…

Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions

BACKGROUND: Models of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because of a la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline, Atherly, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x
_version_ 1783545914405683200
author van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
Atherly, Adam
author_facet van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
Atherly, Adam
author_sort van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Models of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because of a lack of critical data elements. The objective of this review is to outline the advantages of using stated preferences (SP) data in health services research, and to outline how these methods can be used to evaluate choices that have not yet been offered or studied. MAIN BODY: This article focuses on the application of DCE’s to relevant policy and health system delivery questions currently relevant, particularly in the United States. DCE’s may be helpful to collect data from patient or consumer data that we currently do not have. The article provides examples of research questions that have been answered using SP data collected with a DCE. It outlines how to construct a DCE and how to analyze the data. It also discusses the methodological challenges and emphasizes important considerations regarding the design and estimation methods. SP data can be adopted in situations where we would like to have consumer choice data, but we currently do not. These are often hypothetical situations to analyze the decision-making process of individuals. With SP data it is possible to analyze trade-offs patients make when choosing between treatment options where these hard to measure attributes are important. CONCLUSION: This paper emphasizes that a carefully designed DCE and appropriate estimation methods can open up a new world of data regarding trade-offs patients and providers in healthcare are willing to make. It updates previous “how to” guide for DCE’s for health services researchers and health economists who are not familiar with these methods or have been unwilling to use them and updates previous description of these methods with timely examples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7291477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72914772020-06-15 Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline Atherly, Adam Health Econ Rev Review BACKGROUND: Models of preferences in health services research (HSR) and Health Economics are often defined by readily available information, such as that captured in claims data and electronic health records. Yet many important questions about patient choices cannot be easily studied because of a lack of critical data elements. The objective of this review is to outline the advantages of using stated preferences (SP) data in health services research, and to outline how these methods can be used to evaluate choices that have not yet been offered or studied. MAIN BODY: This article focuses on the application of DCE’s to relevant policy and health system delivery questions currently relevant, particularly in the United States. DCE’s may be helpful to collect data from patient or consumer data that we currently do not have. The article provides examples of research questions that have been answered using SP data collected with a DCE. It outlines how to construct a DCE and how to analyze the data. It also discusses the methodological challenges and emphasizes important considerations regarding the design and estimation methods. SP data can be adopted in situations where we would like to have consumer choice data, but we currently do not. These are often hypothetical situations to analyze the decision-making process of individuals. With SP data it is possible to analyze trade-offs patients make when choosing between treatment options where these hard to measure attributes are important. CONCLUSION: This paper emphasizes that a carefully designed DCE and appropriate estimation methods can open up a new world of data regarding trade-offs patients and providers in healthcare are willing to make. It updates previous “how to” guide for DCE’s for health services researchers and health economists who are not familiar with these methods or have been unwilling to use them and updates previous description of these methods with timely examples. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7291477/ /pubmed/32529586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
Atherly, Adam
Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_full Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_fullStr Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_full_unstemmed Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_short Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
title_sort using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbroekaltenburgeline usingdiscretechoiceexperimentstomeasurepreferencesforhardtoobservechoiceattributestoinformhealthpolicydecisions
AT atherlyadam usingdiscretechoiceexperimentstomeasurepreferencesforhardtoobservechoiceattributestoinformhealthpolicydecisions