Cargando…

Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: We examined the validity and applicability of the Kugel repair approach for obturator hernias, whereby we placed a Kugel patch through the preperitoneal space after placing a short 5-cm skin incision just medial to the anterior iliac spine and 2 cm cranial to the expected origin of the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosoi, Yoshie, Asano, Hiroshi, Fukano, Hiroyuki, Shinozuka, Nozomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00795-8
_version_ 1783545944098209792
author Hosoi, Yoshie
Asano, Hiroshi
Fukano, Hiroyuki
Shinozuka, Nozomi
author_facet Hosoi, Yoshie
Asano, Hiroshi
Fukano, Hiroyuki
Shinozuka, Nozomi
author_sort Hosoi, Yoshie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined the validity and applicability of the Kugel repair approach for obturator hernias, whereby we placed a Kugel patch through the preperitoneal space after placing a short 5-cm skin incision just medial to the anterior iliac spine and 2 cm cranial to the expected origin of the internal inguinal ring. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent surgical Kugel repair for obturator hernias at the Department of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University between 2007 and 2017. We examined the operating time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality rate. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with obturator hernias presented with symptoms of small bowel obstruction. A Kugel approach was used in 53 patients and a midline approach was used in 5 patients with preoperative peritonitis. Of the 53 patients managed using the Kugel approach, 39 did not require intestinal resection; a mesh was used in all these patients. In the remaining 14 patients, intestinal resection was required and performed using the same approach; subsequently, a mesh was used successfully in 6 of these 14 patients. The overall median operating time was 47 min; the corresponding values for procedures with and without intestinal resection were 39 and 68 min, respectively. In terms of postoperative complications, operative mortality was not noted among patients without intestinal perforation; however, superficial surgical site infection developed in 2 patients. Among the 5 patients with preoperative peritonitis who underwent exploratory laparotomy via a midline incision, intestinal perforation was detected during surgery, and all patients required intestinal resection; none of the patients had received a mesh, and 2 patients died after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Kugel repair approach was possible even in patients with obturator hernia requiring intestinal resection. However, for patients with perforations, open surgery should be performed after securing the surgical field through a midline incision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7291628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72916282020-06-12 Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study Hosoi, Yoshie Asano, Hiroshi Fukano, Hiroyuki Shinozuka, Nozomi BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: We examined the validity and applicability of the Kugel repair approach for obturator hernias, whereby we placed a Kugel patch through the preperitoneal space after placing a short 5-cm skin incision just medial to the anterior iliac spine and 2 cm cranial to the expected origin of the internal inguinal ring. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent surgical Kugel repair for obturator hernias at the Department of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University between 2007 and 2017. We examined the operating time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and mortality rate. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with obturator hernias presented with symptoms of small bowel obstruction. A Kugel approach was used in 53 patients and a midline approach was used in 5 patients with preoperative peritonitis. Of the 53 patients managed using the Kugel approach, 39 did not require intestinal resection; a mesh was used in all these patients. In the remaining 14 patients, intestinal resection was required and performed using the same approach; subsequently, a mesh was used successfully in 6 of these 14 patients. The overall median operating time was 47 min; the corresponding values for procedures with and without intestinal resection were 39 and 68 min, respectively. In terms of postoperative complications, operative mortality was not noted among patients without intestinal perforation; however, superficial surgical site infection developed in 2 patients. Among the 5 patients with preoperative peritonitis who underwent exploratory laparotomy via a midline incision, intestinal perforation was detected during surgery, and all patients required intestinal resection; none of the patients had received a mesh, and 2 patients died after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Kugel repair approach was possible even in patients with obturator hernia requiring intestinal resection. However, for patients with perforations, open surgery should be performed after securing the surgical field through a midline incision. BioMed Central 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7291628/ /pubmed/32532257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00795-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hosoi, Yoshie
Asano, Hiroshi
Fukano, Hiroyuki
Shinozuka, Nozomi
Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
title Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
title_full Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
title_short Treatment outcomes of Kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
title_sort treatment outcomes of kugel repair for obturator hernias: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00795-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hosoiyoshie treatmentoutcomesofkugelrepairforobturatorherniasaretrospectivestudy
AT asanohiroshi treatmentoutcomesofkugelrepairforobturatorherniasaretrospectivestudy
AT fukanohiroyuki treatmentoutcomesofkugelrepairforobturatorherniasaretrospectivestudy
AT shinozukanozomi treatmentoutcomesofkugelrepairforobturatorherniasaretrospectivestudy