Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale
BACKGROUND: Active-emphatic listening is active listening that focuses on empathy. The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS) is a self-report scale comprising three dimensions: sensing, processing, and responding. However, translated versions are not available for languages used in Asian countries,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00422-4 |
_version_ | 1783545958465798144 |
---|---|
author | Asai, Keigo Hiraizumi, Taku Hanzawa, Reino |
author_facet | Asai, Keigo Hiraizumi, Taku Hanzawa, Reino |
author_sort | Asai, Keigo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Active-emphatic listening is active listening that focuses on empathy. The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS) is a self-report scale comprising three dimensions: sensing, processing, and responding. However, translated versions are not available for languages used in Asian countries, such as Japanese. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate and report on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the AELS. METHODS: After the scale was back translated, 728 Japanese university students completed the Japanese AELS. Of those participants, 566 responded to Japanese versions of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and Encode, Decode, Control, and Regulate Model (ENDCOREs) for validation, and the Japanese AELS was administered again to 59 participants after 3 weeks, to determine test-retest reliability. This study used confirmatory factor analysis to validate the scale’s three-factor structure. To evaluate reliability, Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s omega, and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated. To examine validity, correlation and partial correlation analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Results indicated that the factor structure of the Japanese AELS was equivalent to that of the original AELS (CFI = .942, TLI = .920, RMSEA = .055). The scale had adequate internal reliability (sensing: α = .64/ ω = .72, processing: α = .61/ ω = .62, responding: α = .68/ ω = .77, total: α = .82/ ω = .86) and a moderate test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (sensing: .53, 95%Cl [.31–.69], processing: .48, 95%Cl [.26–.65], responding: .52, 95%Cl [.31–.68], total: .51, 95%Cl [.29–.68]). Criterion-related validity was demonstrated by the positive correlation between the Japanese AELS and other measures (IRI and ENDCOREs). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the validity of the Japanese AELS is relatively comparable to the original AELS; however, it will be necessary to determine potential cultural concerns by comparing Japanese culture and other Asian cultures in future studies. The Japanese AELS is expected to be used to measure the outcomes of active listening training in Japan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7291695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72916952020-06-12 Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale Asai, Keigo Hiraizumi, Taku Hanzawa, Reino BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: Active-emphatic listening is active listening that focuses on empathy. The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS) is a self-report scale comprising three dimensions: sensing, processing, and responding. However, translated versions are not available for languages used in Asian countries, such as Japanese. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate and report on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the AELS. METHODS: After the scale was back translated, 728 Japanese university students completed the Japanese AELS. Of those participants, 566 responded to Japanese versions of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and Encode, Decode, Control, and Regulate Model (ENDCOREs) for validation, and the Japanese AELS was administered again to 59 participants after 3 weeks, to determine test-retest reliability. This study used confirmatory factor analysis to validate the scale’s three-factor structure. To evaluate reliability, Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s omega, and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated. To examine validity, correlation and partial correlation analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Results indicated that the factor structure of the Japanese AELS was equivalent to that of the original AELS (CFI = .942, TLI = .920, RMSEA = .055). The scale had adequate internal reliability (sensing: α = .64/ ω = .72, processing: α = .61/ ω = .62, responding: α = .68/ ω = .77, total: α = .82/ ω = .86) and a moderate test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (sensing: .53, 95%Cl [.31–.69], processing: .48, 95%Cl [.26–.65], responding: .52, 95%Cl [.31–.68], total: .51, 95%Cl [.29–.68]). Criterion-related validity was demonstrated by the positive correlation between the Japanese AELS and other measures (IRI and ENDCOREs). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the validity of the Japanese AELS is relatively comparable to the original AELS; however, it will be necessary to determine potential cultural concerns by comparing Japanese culture and other Asian cultures in future studies. The Japanese AELS is expected to be used to measure the outcomes of active listening training in Japan. BioMed Central 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7291695/ /pubmed/32527312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00422-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Asai, Keigo Hiraizumi, Taku Hanzawa, Reino Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
title | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00422-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asaikeigo reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionoftheactiveemphaticlisteningscale AT hiraizumitaku reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionoftheactiveemphaticlisteningscale AT hanzawareino reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionoftheactiveemphaticlisteningscale |