Cargando…
Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome
BACKGROUND: A placental microbiome, which may be altered in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), has been described. However, publications raising doubts about the existence of a placental microbiome that is different than contaminants in DNA extraction kits and reagents (“kitomes”) have emerged. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01839-y |
_version_ | 1783545965178781696 |
---|---|
author | Olomu, Isoken Nicholas Pena-Cortes, Luis Carlos Long, Robert A. Vyas, Arpita Krichevskiy, Olha Luellwitz, Ryan Singh, Pallavi Mulks, Martha H. |
author_facet | Olomu, Isoken Nicholas Pena-Cortes, Luis Carlos Long, Robert A. Vyas, Arpita Krichevskiy, Olha Luellwitz, Ryan Singh, Pallavi Mulks, Martha H. |
author_sort | Olomu, Isoken Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A placental microbiome, which may be altered in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), has been described. However, publications raising doubts about the existence of a placental microbiome that is different than contaminants in DNA extraction kits and reagents (“kitomes”) have emerged. The aims of this study were to confirm the existence of a placental microbiome distinct from contaminants and determine if it is altered in GDM mothers. RESULTS: We first enrolled normal weight, obese and GDM mothers (N = 17) at term elective cesarean section delivery in a pilot case control study. Bacterial DNA was extracted from placental parenchyma, maternal and cord blood, maternal vaginal-rectal swabs, and positive and negative controls with the standard Qiagen/MoBio Power Soil kit. Placentas had significantly higher copies of bacterial 16S rRNA genes than negative controls, but the placental microbiome was similar in all three groups and could not be distinguished from contaminants in blank controls. To determine the source and composition of the putative placental bacterial community identified in the pilot study, we expanded the study to 10 subjects per group (N = 30) and increased the number and variety of negative controls (N = 53). We modified our protocol to use an ultraclean DNA extraction kit (Qiagen QIAamp UCP with Pathogen Lysis Tube S), which reduced the “kitome” contamination, but we were still unable to distinguish a placental microbiome from contaminants in negative controls. We noted microbial DNA from the high biomass vaginal-rectal swabs and positive controls in placental and negative control samples and determined that this resulted from close proximity well-to-well cross contamination or “splashome”. We eliminated this source of contamination by repeating the sequencing run with a minimum of four wells separating high biomass from low biomass samples. This reduced the reads of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in placental samples to insignificant numbers. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the problem of well-to-well contamination (“splashome”) as an additional source of error in microbiome studies of low biomass samples and found a method of eliminating it. Once “kitome” and “splashome” contaminants were eliminated, we were unable to identify a unique placental microbiome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7291729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72917292020-06-12 Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome Olomu, Isoken Nicholas Pena-Cortes, Luis Carlos Long, Robert A. Vyas, Arpita Krichevskiy, Olha Luellwitz, Ryan Singh, Pallavi Mulks, Martha H. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: A placental microbiome, which may be altered in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), has been described. However, publications raising doubts about the existence of a placental microbiome that is different than contaminants in DNA extraction kits and reagents (“kitomes”) have emerged. The aims of this study were to confirm the existence of a placental microbiome distinct from contaminants and determine if it is altered in GDM mothers. RESULTS: We first enrolled normal weight, obese and GDM mothers (N = 17) at term elective cesarean section delivery in a pilot case control study. Bacterial DNA was extracted from placental parenchyma, maternal and cord blood, maternal vaginal-rectal swabs, and positive and negative controls with the standard Qiagen/MoBio Power Soil kit. Placentas had significantly higher copies of bacterial 16S rRNA genes than negative controls, but the placental microbiome was similar in all three groups and could not be distinguished from contaminants in blank controls. To determine the source and composition of the putative placental bacterial community identified in the pilot study, we expanded the study to 10 subjects per group (N = 30) and increased the number and variety of negative controls (N = 53). We modified our protocol to use an ultraclean DNA extraction kit (Qiagen QIAamp UCP with Pathogen Lysis Tube S), which reduced the “kitome” contamination, but we were still unable to distinguish a placental microbiome from contaminants in negative controls. We noted microbial DNA from the high biomass vaginal-rectal swabs and positive controls in placental and negative control samples and determined that this resulted from close proximity well-to-well cross contamination or “splashome”. We eliminated this source of contamination by repeating the sequencing run with a minimum of four wells separating high biomass from low biomass samples. This reduced the reads of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in placental samples to insignificant numbers. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the problem of well-to-well contamination (“splashome”) as an additional source of error in microbiome studies of low biomass samples and found a method of eliminating it. Once “kitome” and “splashome” contaminants were eliminated, we were unable to identify a unique placental microbiome. BioMed Central 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7291729/ /pubmed/32527226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01839-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Olomu, Isoken Nicholas Pena-Cortes, Luis Carlos Long, Robert A. Vyas, Arpita Krichevskiy, Olha Luellwitz, Ryan Singh, Pallavi Mulks, Martha H. Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
title | Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
title_full | Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
title_fullStr | Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
title_full_unstemmed | Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
title_short | Elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
title_sort | elimination of “kitome” and “splashome” contamination results in lack of detection of a unique placental microbiome |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01839-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olomuisokennicholas eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT penacortesluiscarlos eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT longroberta eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT vyasarpita eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT krichevskiyolha eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT luellwitzryan eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT singhpallavi eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome AT mulksmarthah eliminationofkitomeandsplashomecontaminationresultsinlackofdetectionofauniqueplacentalmicrobiome |