Cargando…

Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures has not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to review and summarise the findings from studies that have evaluated the effect of orthotic materials on plantar pressures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerrard, James M., Bonanno, Daniel R., Whittaker, Glen A., Landorf, Karl B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00401-3
_version_ 1783545966177026048
author Gerrard, James M.
Bonanno, Daniel R.
Whittaker, Glen A.
Landorf, Karl B.
author_facet Gerrard, James M.
Bonanno, Daniel R.
Whittaker, Glen A.
Landorf, Karl B.
author_sort Gerrard, James M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures has not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to review and summarise the findings from studies that have evaluated the effect of orthotic materials on plantar pressures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of experimental studies that evaluated the effect of foot orthotic materials or shoe insole materials on plantar pressures using in-shoe testing during walking. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and SPORTDiscus. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using a modified Quality Index. Peak pressure, pressure-time integral, maximum force, force-time integral, contact area, and contact time were variables of interest. Data were synthesised descriptively as studies were not sufficiently homogeneous to conduct meta-analysis. Standardised mean differences (Cohen’s d) were calculated to provide the size of the effect between materials found in each study. RESULTS: Five studies were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria. All five studies were laboratory-based and used a repeated measures design. The quality of the studies varied with scores ranging between 20 and 23 on the modified Quality Index (maximum index score 28). The included studies investigated the effects of polyurethane (including PORON®), polyethylene (including Plastazote®), ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) and carbon graphite on plantar pressures. Polyurethane (including PORON®), polyethylene (including Plastazote®) and EVA were all found to reduce peak pressure. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited evidence supplied from the five studies included in this review, some orthotic materials can reduce plantar pressures during walking. Polyurethane (including PORON®), polyethylene (including Plastazote®) and EVA reduce peak pressure beneath varying regions of the foot. Future well-designed studies will strengthen this evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7291735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72917352020-06-12 Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review Gerrard, James M. Bonanno, Daniel R. Whittaker, Glen A. Landorf, Karl B. J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: The effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures has not been systematically investigated. This study aimed to review and summarise the findings from studies that have evaluated the effect of orthotic materials on plantar pressures. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of experimental studies that evaluated the effect of foot orthotic materials or shoe insole materials on plantar pressures using in-shoe testing during walking. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and SPORTDiscus. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using a modified Quality Index. Peak pressure, pressure-time integral, maximum force, force-time integral, contact area, and contact time were variables of interest. Data were synthesised descriptively as studies were not sufficiently homogeneous to conduct meta-analysis. Standardised mean differences (Cohen’s d) were calculated to provide the size of the effect between materials found in each study. RESULTS: Five studies were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria. All five studies were laboratory-based and used a repeated measures design. The quality of the studies varied with scores ranging between 20 and 23 on the modified Quality Index (maximum index score 28). The included studies investigated the effects of polyurethane (including PORON®), polyethylene (including Plastazote®), ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) and carbon graphite on plantar pressures. Polyurethane (including PORON®), polyethylene (including Plastazote®) and EVA were all found to reduce peak pressure. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited evidence supplied from the five studies included in this review, some orthotic materials can reduce plantar pressures during walking. Polyurethane (including PORON®), polyethylene (including Plastazote®) and EVA reduce peak pressure beneath varying regions of the foot. Future well-designed studies will strengthen this evidence. BioMed Central 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7291735/ /pubmed/32527296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00401-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Gerrard, James M.
Bonanno, Daniel R.
Whittaker, Glen A.
Landorf, Karl B.
Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
title Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
title_full Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
title_short Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
title_sort effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00401-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gerrardjamesm effectofdifferentorthoticmaterialsonplantarpressuresasystematicreview
AT bonannodanielr effectofdifferentorthoticmaterialsonplantarpressuresasystematicreview
AT whittakerglena effectofdifferentorthoticmaterialsonplantarpressuresasystematicreview
AT landorfkarlb effectofdifferentorthoticmaterialsonplantarpressuresasystematicreview