Cargando…

Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvey, Philip D., Nakamura, Hiroshi, Miura, Sadanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12089
_version_ 1783546063853977600
author Harvey, Philip D.
Nakamura, Hiroshi
Miura, Sadanori
author_facet Harvey, Philip D.
Nakamura, Hiroshi
Miura, Sadanori
author_sort Harvey, Philip D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approaches for schizophrenia treatment. METHODS: Of 302 patients randomized, 156 received blonanserin (8‐24 mg/d) and 145 received risperidone (2‐6 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score for the primary outcome, PANSS subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement (CGI‐I) for secondary outcomes. Safety variables included treatment‐emergent adverse events, Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale scores, laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc RESULTS: Blonanserin was not inferior to risperidone in the change in PANSS total score at a non‐inferior margin of −7 (intergroup difference, −0.46; 95% CI, −4.40 to 3.48). Post hoc analyses wholly supported the primary result. No major difference was found in the changes in BPRS scores and the improvement rate on CGI‐I between the drugs. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two drugs. Blonanserin was associated with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. However, blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia and excitability compared with risperidone. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity with no specific events of predominant high severity in the both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Blonanserin exerted the similar efficacy to risperidone in both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. Blonanserin will serve as a favorable treatment option for schizophrenia in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7292214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72922142020-12-08 Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study Harvey, Philip D. Nakamura, Hiroshi Miura, Sadanori Neuropsychopharmacol Rep Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approaches for schizophrenia treatment. METHODS: Of 302 patients randomized, 156 received blonanserin (8‐24 mg/d) and 145 received risperidone (2‐6 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score for the primary outcome, PANSS subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement (CGI‐I) for secondary outcomes. Safety variables included treatment‐emergent adverse events, Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale scores, laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc RESULTS: Blonanserin was not inferior to risperidone in the change in PANSS total score at a non‐inferior margin of −7 (intergroup difference, −0.46; 95% CI, −4.40 to 3.48). Post hoc analyses wholly supported the primary result. No major difference was found in the changes in BPRS scores and the improvement rate on CGI‐I between the drugs. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two drugs. Blonanserin was associated with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. However, blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia and excitability compared with risperidone. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity with no specific events of predominant high severity in the both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Blonanserin exerted the similar efficacy to risperidone in both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. Blonanserin will serve as a favorable treatment option for schizophrenia in daily clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7292214/ /pubmed/31788985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12089 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Society of NeuropsychoPharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Harvey, Philip D.
Nakamura, Hiroshi
Miura, Sadanori
Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
title Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
title_full Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
title_short Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
title_sort blonanserin vs risperidone in japanese patients with schizophrenia: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12089
work_keys_str_mv AT harveyphilipd blonanserinvsrisperidoneinjapanesepatientswithschizophreniaaposthocanalysisofaphase38weekmulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakamurahiroshi blonanserinvsrisperidoneinjapanesepatientswithschizophreniaaposthocanalysisofaphase38weekmulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT miurasadanori blonanserinvsrisperidoneinjapanesepatientswithschizophreniaaposthocanalysisofaphase38weekmulticenterdoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy