Cargando…

Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol

AIM: Clinical trials and meta‐analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left prefrontal cortex in treatment‐resistant depression. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the conventional 37....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kito, Shinsuke, Miyazi, Midori, Nakatani, Honoka, Matsuda, Yuki, Yamazaki, Ryuichi, Okamoto, Tatsuya, Igarashi, Yoshio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31240870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12066
_version_ 1783546077771726848
author Kito, Shinsuke
Miyazi, Midori
Nakatani, Honoka
Matsuda, Yuki
Yamazaki, Ryuichi
Okamoto, Tatsuya
Igarashi, Yoshio
author_facet Kito, Shinsuke
Miyazi, Midori
Nakatani, Honoka
Matsuda, Yuki
Yamazaki, Ryuichi
Okamoto, Tatsuya
Igarashi, Yoshio
author_sort Kito, Shinsuke
collection PubMed
description AIM: Clinical trials and meta‐analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left prefrontal cortex in treatment‐resistant depression. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the conventional 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute rTMS protocol over the left prefrontal cortex in patients with treatment‐resistant depressive episode. METHODS: Thirty patients with treatment‐resistant depression or bipolar disorder depressive episode were randomized 1:1 to either 37.5‐minute or 18.75‐minute rTMS protocol groups. rTMS treatment was applied at 120% resting motor threshold with 10 Hz over the left prefrontal cortex. Treatment sessions were delivered for a total of 3000 pulses/d, 5 days a week, for 4‐6 weeks. Patients received a 75 trains with “4 sec on and 26 sec off” for 37.5 minutes or a 75 trains with “4 sec on and 11 sec off” for 18.75 minutes. Severity of depression was rated with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐9). Remission was defined as a total score of 5 or less on the QIDS. The primary outcome measure was to compare the remission rate between the both groups. RESULTS: Thirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) showed remission at week 6. There were no significant differences in the remission rate between the conventional 37.5‐ and 18.75‐minute protocol groups (46.7% and 40.0%, respectively). No seizures or treatment‐emergent mania/hypomania were occurred. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, compared with the conventional one, rTMS with 18.75‐minute protocol might be equally effective and clinically beneficial in saving the treatment session length. Further well‐designed studies are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7292276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72922762020-12-08 Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol Kito, Shinsuke Miyazi, Midori Nakatani, Honoka Matsuda, Yuki Yamazaki, Ryuichi Okamoto, Tatsuya Igarashi, Yoshio Neuropsychopharmacol Rep Original Articles AIM: Clinical trials and meta‐analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left prefrontal cortex in treatment‐resistant depression. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the conventional 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute rTMS protocol over the left prefrontal cortex in patients with treatment‐resistant depressive episode. METHODS: Thirty patients with treatment‐resistant depression or bipolar disorder depressive episode were randomized 1:1 to either 37.5‐minute or 18.75‐minute rTMS protocol groups. rTMS treatment was applied at 120% resting motor threshold with 10 Hz over the left prefrontal cortex. Treatment sessions were delivered for a total of 3000 pulses/d, 5 days a week, for 4‐6 weeks. Patients received a 75 trains with “4 sec on and 26 sec off” for 37.5 minutes or a 75 trains with “4 sec on and 11 sec off” for 18.75 minutes. Severity of depression was rated with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐9). Remission was defined as a total score of 5 or less on the QIDS. The primary outcome measure was to compare the remission rate between the both groups. RESULTS: Thirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) showed remission at week 6. There were no significant differences in the remission rate between the conventional 37.5‐ and 18.75‐minute protocol groups (46.7% and 40.0%, respectively). No seizures or treatment‐emergent mania/hypomania were occurred. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, compared with the conventional one, rTMS with 18.75‐minute protocol might be equally effective and clinically beneficial in saving the treatment session length. Further well‐designed studies are needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7292276/ /pubmed/31240870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12066 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of NeuropsychoPharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kito, Shinsuke
Miyazi, Midori
Nakatani, Honoka
Matsuda, Yuki
Yamazaki, Ryuichi
Okamoto, Tatsuya
Igarashi, Yoshio
Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
title Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
title_full Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
title_fullStr Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
title_short Effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
title_sort effectiveness of high‐frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment‐resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial of 37.5‐minute vs 18.75‐minute protocol
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31240870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12066
work_keys_str_mv AT kitoshinsuke effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol
AT miyazimidori effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol
AT nakatanihonoka effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol
AT matsudayuki effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol
AT yamazakiryuichi effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol
AT okamototatsuya effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol
AT igarashiyoshio effectivenessofhighfrequencyleftprefrontalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpatientswithtreatmentresistantdepressionarandomizedclinicaltrialof375minutevs1875minuteprotocol