Cargando…

Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan

Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with RE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogata, Misato, Kotaka, Masahito, Ogata, Takatsugu, Hatachi, Yukimasa, Yasui, Hisateru, Kato, Takeshi, Tsuji, Akihito, Satake, Hironaga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32530932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234314
_version_ 1783546095143485440
author Ogata, Misato
Kotaka, Masahito
Ogata, Takatsugu
Hatachi, Yukimasa
Yasui, Hisateru
Kato, Takeshi
Tsuji, Akihito
Satake, Hironaga
author_facet Ogata, Misato
Kotaka, Masahito
Ogata, Takatsugu
Hatachi, Yukimasa
Yasui, Hisateru
Kato, Takeshi
Tsuji, Akihito
Satake, Hironaga
author_sort Ogata, Misato
collection PubMed
description Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with REG or FTD/TPI as a salvage-line therapy from May 2014 to December 2017 were included. We retrospectively analyzed long-term survival, safety, and clinical outcomes. Among 134 patients, 57 and 77 received REG and FTD/TPI, respectively. The REG group received more prior systemic chemotherapies and significantly more frequent additional chemotherapies than the FTD/TPI group did. The median follow-up was 6.2 months, whereas the median overall survival was 9.9 and 11.4 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.954, p = 0.837). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 and 3.3 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.52, p = 0.00047), indicating significant differences, whereas the objective response and disease control rates did not differ. The median overall survival of patients with additional subsequent chemotherapies after disease progression was longer than that of patients without additional chemotherapy. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension and neutropenia in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively. Our study suggested that sequential use of both drugs may prolong survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7292354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72923542020-06-18 Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan Ogata, Misato Kotaka, Masahito Ogata, Takatsugu Hatachi, Yukimasa Yasui, Hisateru Kato, Takeshi Tsuji, Akihito Satake, Hironaga PLoS One Research Article Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with REG or FTD/TPI as a salvage-line therapy from May 2014 to December 2017 were included. We retrospectively analyzed long-term survival, safety, and clinical outcomes. Among 134 patients, 57 and 77 received REG and FTD/TPI, respectively. The REG group received more prior systemic chemotherapies and significantly more frequent additional chemotherapies than the FTD/TPI group did. The median follow-up was 6.2 months, whereas the median overall survival was 9.9 and 11.4 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.954, p = 0.837). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 and 3.3 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.52, p = 0.00047), indicating significant differences, whereas the objective response and disease control rates did not differ. The median overall survival of patients with additional subsequent chemotherapies after disease progression was longer than that of patients without additional chemotherapy. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension and neutropenia in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively. Our study suggested that sequential use of both drugs may prolong survival. Public Library of Science 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7292354/ /pubmed/32530932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234314 Text en © 2020 Ogata et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ogata, Misato
Kotaka, Masahito
Ogata, Takatsugu
Hatachi, Yukimasa
Yasui, Hisateru
Kato, Takeshi
Tsuji, Akihito
Satake, Hironaga
Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
title Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
title_full Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
title_fullStr Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
title_short Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
title_sort regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: a multicenter retrospective comparison study in japan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32530932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234314
work_keys_str_mv AT ogatamisato regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT kotakamasahito regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT ogatatakatsugu regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT hatachiyukimasa regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT yasuihisateru regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT katotakeshi regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT tsujiakihito regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan
AT satakehironaga regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan