Cargando…
Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan
Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with RE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32530932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234314 |
_version_ | 1783546095143485440 |
---|---|
author | Ogata, Misato Kotaka, Masahito Ogata, Takatsugu Hatachi, Yukimasa Yasui, Hisateru Kato, Takeshi Tsuji, Akihito Satake, Hironaga |
author_facet | Ogata, Misato Kotaka, Masahito Ogata, Takatsugu Hatachi, Yukimasa Yasui, Hisateru Kato, Takeshi Tsuji, Akihito Satake, Hironaga |
author_sort | Ogata, Misato |
collection | PubMed |
description | Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with REG or FTD/TPI as a salvage-line therapy from May 2014 to December 2017 were included. We retrospectively analyzed long-term survival, safety, and clinical outcomes. Among 134 patients, 57 and 77 received REG and FTD/TPI, respectively. The REG group received more prior systemic chemotherapies and significantly more frequent additional chemotherapies than the FTD/TPI group did. The median follow-up was 6.2 months, whereas the median overall survival was 9.9 and 11.4 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.954, p = 0.837). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 and 3.3 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.52, p = 0.00047), indicating significant differences, whereas the objective response and disease control rates did not differ. The median overall survival of patients with additional subsequent chemotherapies after disease progression was longer than that of patients without additional chemotherapy. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension and neutropenia in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively. Our study suggested that sequential use of both drugs may prolong survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7292354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72923542020-06-18 Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan Ogata, Misato Kotaka, Masahito Ogata, Takatsugu Hatachi, Yukimasa Yasui, Hisateru Kato, Takeshi Tsuji, Akihito Satake, Hironaga PLoS One Research Article Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer patients previously treated with standard chemotherapies; therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with REG or FTD/TPI as a salvage-line therapy from May 2014 to December 2017 were included. We retrospectively analyzed long-term survival, safety, and clinical outcomes. Among 134 patients, 57 and 77 received REG and FTD/TPI, respectively. The REG group received more prior systemic chemotherapies and significantly more frequent additional chemotherapies than the FTD/TPI group did. The median follow-up was 6.2 months, whereas the median overall survival was 9.9 and 11.4 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.954, p = 0.837). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 and 3.3 months in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.52, p = 0.00047), indicating significant differences, whereas the objective response and disease control rates did not differ. The median overall survival of patients with additional subsequent chemotherapies after disease progression was longer than that of patients without additional chemotherapy. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension and neutropenia in the REG and FTD/TPI groups, respectively. Our study suggested that sequential use of both drugs may prolong survival. Public Library of Science 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7292354/ /pubmed/32530932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234314 Text en © 2020 Ogata et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ogata, Misato Kotaka, Masahito Ogata, Takatsugu Hatachi, Yukimasa Yasui, Hisateru Kato, Takeshi Tsuji, Akihito Satake, Hironaga Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan |
title | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan |
title_full | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan |
title_fullStr | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan |
title_short | Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: A multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan |
title_sort | regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: a multicenter retrospective comparison study in japan |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32530932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogatamisato regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT kotakamasahito regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT ogatatakatsugu regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT hatachiyukimasa regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT yasuihisateru regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT katotakeshi regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT tsujiakihito regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan AT satakehironaga regorafenibvstrifluridinetipiracilformetastaticcolorectalcancerrefractorytostandardchemotherapiesamulticenterretrospectivecomparisonstudyinjapan |