Cargando…

Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

There are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xian, Zhang, Huan, Zhang, Haijing, Guo, Mengzhuo, Gao, Yuanchao, Du, Chunyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32530935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353
_version_ 1783546110780899328
author Liu, Xian
Zhang, Huan
Zhang, Haijing
Guo, Mengzhuo
Gao, Yuanchao
Du, Chunyan
author_facet Liu, Xian
Zhang, Huan
Zhang, Haijing
Guo, Mengzhuo
Gao, Yuanchao
Du, Chunyan
author_sort Liu, Xian
collection PubMed
description There are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four electronic databases were used to identify eligible RCTs. Pooled effect estimates at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-two RCTs with 2,573 parturients were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the incidences of cesarean and instrumental delivery. IPB was shown to be associated with shorter total duration of labor [weighted mean difference (WMD): −21.46; 95% CI: −25.07 to −17.85; P < 0.001], duration of the first of stage of labor (WMD: −13.41; 95% CI: −21.01 to −5.81; P = 0.001), and duration of the second stage of labor (WMD: −4.98; 95% CI: −9.32 to −0.63; P = 0.025). Furthermore, IPB significantly reduced the incidences of required anesthetic interventions compared with CPI [relative risk (RR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39–0.95; P = 0.030], whereas there was no significant difference between IPB and CPI for the time required in the first anesthetic intervention (WMD: 7.73; 95% CI: −33.68–49.15; P = 0.714). The local anesthetic IPB (bupivacaine equivalents) was associated with lower milligrams per hour of local anesthetic (WMD: −0.89; 95% CI: −1.41 to −0.36; P = 0.001) and better maternal satisfaction (WMD: 8.76; 95% CI: 4.18–13.35; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the risk of adverse events. This study found that parturients with IPB have short total duration of labor and duration of the first and second stage of labor, reduced requirements for additional anesthetic interventions, and improved maternal satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7292420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72924202020-06-18 Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liu, Xian Zhang, Huan Zhang, Haijing Guo, Mengzhuo Gao, Yuanchao Du, Chunyan PLoS One Research Article There are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four electronic databases were used to identify eligible RCTs. Pooled effect estimates at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-two RCTs with 2,573 parturients were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the incidences of cesarean and instrumental delivery. IPB was shown to be associated with shorter total duration of labor [weighted mean difference (WMD): −21.46; 95% CI: −25.07 to −17.85; P < 0.001], duration of the first of stage of labor (WMD: −13.41; 95% CI: −21.01 to −5.81; P = 0.001), and duration of the second stage of labor (WMD: −4.98; 95% CI: −9.32 to −0.63; P = 0.025). Furthermore, IPB significantly reduced the incidences of required anesthetic interventions compared with CPI [relative risk (RR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39–0.95; P = 0.030], whereas there was no significant difference between IPB and CPI for the time required in the first anesthetic intervention (WMD: 7.73; 95% CI: −33.68–49.15; P = 0.714). The local anesthetic IPB (bupivacaine equivalents) was associated with lower milligrams per hour of local anesthetic (WMD: −0.89; 95% CI: −1.41 to −0.36; P = 0.001) and better maternal satisfaction (WMD: 8.76; 95% CI: 4.18–13.35; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the risk of adverse events. This study found that parturients with IPB have short total duration of labor and duration of the first and second stage of labor, reduced requirements for additional anesthetic interventions, and improved maternal satisfaction. Public Library of Science 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7292420/ /pubmed/32530935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353 Text en © 2020 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Xian
Zhang, Huan
Zhang, Haijing
Guo, Mengzhuo
Gao, Yuanchao
Du, Chunyan
Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32530935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxian intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhanghuan intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhanghaijing intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT guomengzhuo intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gaoyuanchao intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT duchunyan intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials