Cargando…
Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam – Lifesil® – and microtexturized silicone – Lifesil®). The evolut...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007 |
_version_ | 1783546146045558784 |
---|---|
author | de Calaes, Ivana Leme Motta, Marcos Matias Basso, Rafael de Campos Calderoni, Davi Reis Kharmandayan, Paulo |
author_facet | de Calaes, Ivana Leme Motta, Marcos Matias Basso, Rafael de Campos Calderoni, Davi Reis Kharmandayan, Paulo |
author_sort | de Calaes, Ivana Leme |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam – Lifesil® – and microtexturized silicone – Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7292626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72926262020-06-23 Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1) de Calaes, Ivana Leme Motta, Marcos Matias Basso, Rafael de Campos Calderoni, Davi Reis Kharmandayan, Paulo Acta Cir Bras Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam – Lifesil® – and microtexturized silicone – Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7292626/ /pubmed/32555938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation de Calaes, Ivana Leme Motta, Marcos Matias Basso, Rafael de Campos Calderoni, Davi Reis Kharmandayan, Paulo Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1) |
title | Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
(1)
|
title_full | Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
(1)
|
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
(1)
|
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
(1)
|
title_short | Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
(1)
|
title_sort | comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants
(1) |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decalaesivanaleme comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1 AT mottamarcosmatias comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1 AT bassorafaeldecampos comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1 AT calderonidavireis comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1 AT kharmandayanpaulo comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1 |