Cargando…

Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam – Lifesil® – and microtexturized silicone – Lifesil®). The evolut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Calaes, Ivana Leme, Motta, Marcos Matias, Basso, Rafael de Campos, Calderoni, Davi Reis, Kharmandayan, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007
_version_ 1783546146045558784
author de Calaes, Ivana Leme
Motta, Marcos Matias
Basso, Rafael de Campos
Calderoni, Davi Reis
Kharmandayan, Paulo
author_facet de Calaes, Ivana Leme
Motta, Marcos Matias
Basso, Rafael de Campos
Calderoni, Davi Reis
Kharmandayan, Paulo
author_sort de Calaes, Ivana Leme
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam – Lifesil® – and microtexturized silicone – Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7292626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72926262020-06-23 Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1) de Calaes, Ivana Leme Motta, Marcos Matias Basso, Rafael de Campos Calderoni, Davi Reis Kharmandayan, Paulo Acta Cir Bras Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone foam implants have a different evolution pattern compared to conventional texture implants. METHODS: Fifty-eight female patients underwent surgery. They were divided into two groups (silicone foam – Lifesil® – and microtexturized silicone – Lifesil®). The evolution was analyzed in postoperative consultations, with physical examination, photographic documentation and filling in a satisfaction questionnaire, in the postoperative period of one month, four months, one year and then annually, up to a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in presence of rippling, stretch marks, breast ptosis, capsular contracture and quality of scars. There was a higher rate of patients who were very satisfied with the outcome 360 days after surgery in the group receiving silicone foam implants (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In short time, silicone foam envelope implants proved to be as reliable as textured silicone envelope implants, making them an option for augmentation mammoplasty. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7292626/ /pubmed/32555938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
de Calaes, Ivana Leme
Motta, Marcos Matias
Basso, Rafael de Campos
Calderoni, Davi Reis
Kharmandayan, Paulo
Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
title Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
title_full Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
title_fullStr Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
title_short Comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
title_sort comparative clinical evaluation of breast augmentation using silicone foam coated implants and textured implants (1)
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200040000007
work_keys_str_mv AT decalaesivanaleme comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1
AT mottamarcosmatias comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1
AT bassorafaeldecampos comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1
AT calderonidavireis comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1
AT kharmandayanpaulo comparativeclinicalevaluationofbreastaugmentationusingsiliconefoamcoatedimplantsandtexturedimplants1