Cargando…
Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Low‐molecular‐weight‐heparins (LMWHs) have been established for the treatment of cancer‐associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with LMWHs. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12359 |
_version_ | 1783546152078016512 |
---|---|
author | Moik, Florian Posch, Florian Zielinski, Christoph Pabinger, Ingrid Ay, Cihan |
author_facet | Moik, Florian Posch, Florian Zielinski, Christoph Pabinger, Ingrid Ay, Cihan |
author_sort | Moik, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low‐molecular‐weight‐heparins (LMWHs) have been established for the treatment of cancer‐associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with LMWHs. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWHs and update the evidence for treatment of VTE in cancer. METHODS: Biomedical databases were screened for RCTs evaluating DOACs for cancer‐associated VTE. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes of this meta‐analysis were recurrent VTE and major bleeding at 6 months. Secondary outcomes comprised clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), major gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary bleeding, mortality, fatal bleeding/pulmonary embolism, and treatment discontinuation rate. We performed prespecified subgroup analyses. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by the Mantel‐Haenszel method within a random‐effect model. RESULTS: We screened 759 articles and included 4 RCTs (n = 2894). DOACs significantly reduced recurrent VTEs compared to LMWHs (5.2% vs 8.2%; RR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43‐0.91]), but were associated with a nonsignificant increase in major bleedings (4.3% vs 3.3%; RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.83‐2.08]) and a significant increase in CRNMB (10.4% vs 6.4%; RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.19‐2.28]). Mortality risks were comparable between groups (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83‐1.18]). Preterm treatment discontinuation was less common with DOACs (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81‐0.96]). Major bleeding was more frequent in patients with GI cancer treated with DOACs (RR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.08‐4.88]). CONCLUSION: In patients with cancer‐associated VTE, DOACs are more effective in preventing recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. However, risk of bleeding is increased with DOACs, especially in patients with GI cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7292654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72926542020-06-15 Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Moik, Florian Posch, Florian Zielinski, Christoph Pabinger, Ingrid Ay, Cihan Res Pract Thromb Haemost Original Article: Thrombosis BACKGROUND: Low‐molecular‐weight‐heparins (LMWHs) have been established for the treatment of cancer‐associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with LMWHs. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of DOACs versus LMWHs and update the evidence for treatment of VTE in cancer. METHODS: Biomedical databases were screened for RCTs evaluating DOACs for cancer‐associated VTE. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes of this meta‐analysis were recurrent VTE and major bleeding at 6 months. Secondary outcomes comprised clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), major gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary bleeding, mortality, fatal bleeding/pulmonary embolism, and treatment discontinuation rate. We performed prespecified subgroup analyses. Pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by the Mantel‐Haenszel method within a random‐effect model. RESULTS: We screened 759 articles and included 4 RCTs (n = 2894). DOACs significantly reduced recurrent VTEs compared to LMWHs (5.2% vs 8.2%; RR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43‐0.91]), but were associated with a nonsignificant increase in major bleedings (4.3% vs 3.3%; RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.83‐2.08]) and a significant increase in CRNMB (10.4% vs 6.4%; RR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.19‐2.28]). Mortality risks were comparable between groups (RR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83‐1.18]). Preterm treatment discontinuation was less common with DOACs (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81‐0.96]). Major bleeding was more frequent in patients with GI cancer treated with DOACs (RR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.08‐4.88]). CONCLUSION: In patients with cancer‐associated VTE, DOACs are more effective in preventing recurrent VTE compared to LMWH. However, risk of bleeding is increased with DOACs, especially in patients with GI cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7292654/ /pubmed/32548553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12359 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article: Thrombosis Moik, Florian Posch, Florian Zielinski, Christoph Pabinger, Ingrid Ay, Cihan Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: Updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | direct oral anticoagulants compared to low‐molecular‐weight heparin for the treatment of cancer‐associated thrombosis: updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Article: Thrombosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7292654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moikflorian directoralanticoagulantscomparedtolowmolecularweightheparinforthetreatmentofcancerassociatedthrombosisupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT poschflorian directoralanticoagulantscomparedtolowmolecularweightheparinforthetreatmentofcancerassociatedthrombosisupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zielinskichristoph directoralanticoagulantscomparedtolowmolecularweightheparinforthetreatmentofcancerassociatedthrombosisupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT pabingeringrid directoralanticoagulantscomparedtolowmolecularweightheparinforthetreatmentofcancerassociatedthrombosisupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT aycihan directoralanticoagulantscomparedtolowmolecularweightheparinforthetreatmentofcancerassociatedthrombosisupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |