Cargando…

Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses

BACKGROUND: Mental health apps have great potential to help people needing support to cope with distress or specific symptoms. In fact, there is an exponential increase in the number of mental health apps available on the internet, with less than 5% being actually studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lecomte, Tania, Potvin, Stéphane, Corbière, Marc, Guay, Stéphane, Samson, Crystal, Cloutier, Briana, Francoeur, Audrey, Pennou, Antoine, Khazaal, Yasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348289
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17458
_version_ 1783546223588802560
author Lecomte, Tania
Potvin, Stéphane
Corbière, Marc
Guay, Stéphane
Samson, Crystal
Cloutier, Briana
Francoeur, Audrey
Pennou, Antoine
Khazaal, Yasser
author_facet Lecomte, Tania
Potvin, Stéphane
Corbière, Marc
Guay, Stéphane
Samson, Crystal
Cloutier, Briana
Francoeur, Audrey
Pennou, Antoine
Khazaal, Yasser
author_sort Lecomte, Tania
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health apps have great potential to help people needing support to cope with distress or specific symptoms. In fact, there is an exponential increase in the number of mental health apps available on the internet, with less than 5% being actually studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quality of the available evidence regarding the use of mental health apps and to summarize the results obtained so far. METHODS: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were searched, specifically for mobile apps on mental health issues or symptoms, and rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: A total of 7 meta-analyses were carefully reviewed and rated. Although some meta-analyses looked at any mental health issue and analyzed the data together, these studies were of poorer quality and did not offer strong empirical support for the apps. Studies focusing specifically on anxiety symptoms or depressive symptoms were of moderate to high quality and generally had small to medium effect sizes. Similarly, the effects of apps on stress and quality of life tended to offer small to medium effects and were of moderate to high quality. Studies looking at stand-alone apps had smaller effect sizes but better empirical quality than studies looking at apps with guidance. The studies that included follow-ups mostly found a sustained impact of the app at an 11-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-review revealed that apps for anxiety and depression hold great promise with clear clinical advantages, either as stand-alone self-management or as adjunctive treatments. More meta-analyses and more quality studies are needed to recommend apps for other mental health issues or for specific populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7293054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72930542020-06-19 Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses Lecomte, Tania Potvin, Stéphane Corbière, Marc Guay, Stéphane Samson, Crystal Cloutier, Briana Francoeur, Audrey Pennou, Antoine Khazaal, Yasser JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Mental health apps have great potential to help people needing support to cope with distress or specific symptoms. In fact, there is an exponential increase in the number of mental health apps available on the internet, with less than 5% being actually studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quality of the available evidence regarding the use of mental health apps and to summarize the results obtained so far. METHODS: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were searched, specifically for mobile apps on mental health issues or symptoms, and rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: A total of 7 meta-analyses were carefully reviewed and rated. Although some meta-analyses looked at any mental health issue and analyzed the data together, these studies were of poorer quality and did not offer strong empirical support for the apps. Studies focusing specifically on anxiety symptoms or depressive symptoms were of moderate to high quality and generally had small to medium effect sizes. Similarly, the effects of apps on stress and quality of life tended to offer small to medium effects and were of moderate to high quality. Studies looking at stand-alone apps had smaller effect sizes but better empirical quality than studies looking at apps with guidance. The studies that included follow-ups mostly found a sustained impact of the app at an 11-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-review revealed that apps for anxiety and depression hold great promise with clear clinical advantages, either as stand-alone self-management or as adjunctive treatments. More meta-analyses and more quality studies are needed to recommend apps for other mental health issues or for specific populations. JMIR Publications 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7293054/ /pubmed/32348289 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17458 Text en ©Tania Lecomte, Stéphane Potvin, Marc Corbière, Stéphane Guay, Crystal Samson, Briana Cloutier, Audrey Francoeur, Antoine Pennou, Yasser Khazaal. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 29.05.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lecomte, Tania
Potvin, Stéphane
Corbière, Marc
Guay, Stéphane
Samson, Crystal
Cloutier, Briana
Francoeur, Audrey
Pennou, Antoine
Khazaal, Yasser
Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses
title Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses
title_full Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses
title_fullStr Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses
title_short Mobile Apps for Mental Health Issues: Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses
title_sort mobile apps for mental health issues: meta-review of meta-analyses
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348289
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17458
work_keys_str_mv AT lecomtetania mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT potvinstephane mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT corbieremarc mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT guaystephane mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT samsoncrystal mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT cloutierbriana mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT francoeuraudrey mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT pennouantoine mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses
AT khazaalyasser mobileappsformentalhealthissuesmetareviewofmetaanalyses