Cargando…

Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in shared decision making (SDM) in Australia. Question prompt lists (QPLs) support question asking by patients, a key part of SDM. QPLs have been studied in a variety of settings, and increasingly the internet provides a source of suggested questions for pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tracy, Marguerite Clare, Shepherd, Heather L, Patel, Pinika, Trevena, Lyndal Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469321
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17002
_version_ 1783546225473093632
author Tracy, Marguerite Clare
Shepherd, Heather L
Patel, Pinika
Trevena, Lyndal Jane
author_facet Tracy, Marguerite Clare
Shepherd, Heather L
Patel, Pinika
Trevena, Lyndal Jane
author_sort Tracy, Marguerite Clare
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in shared decision making (SDM) in Australia. Question prompt lists (QPLs) support question asking by patients, a key part of SDM. QPLs have been studied in a variety of settings, and increasingly the internet provides a source of suggested questions for patients. Environmental scans have been shown to be useful in assessing the availability and quality of online SDM tools. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the number and readability of QPLs available to users via Google.com.au. METHODS: Our environmental scan used search terms derived from literature and reputable websites to search for QPLs available via Google.com.au. Following removal of duplicates from the 4000 URLs and 22 reputable sites, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create a list of unique QPLs. A sample of 20 QPLs was further assessed for list length, proxy measures of quality such as a date of review, and evidence of doctor endorsement. Readability of the sample QPL instructions and QPLs themselves was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores. RESULTS: Our environmental scan identified 173 unique QPLs available to users. Lists ranged in length from 1 question to >200 questions. Of our sample, 50% (10/20) had a listed date of creation or update, and 60% (12/20) had evidence of authorship or source. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores for instructions were higher than for the QPLs (grades 10.3 and 7.7, respectively). There was over a 1 grade difference between QPLs from reputable sites compared with other sites (grades 4.2 and 5.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: People seeking questions to ask their doctor using Google.com.au encounter a vast number of question lists that they can use to prepare for consultations with their doctors. Markers of the quality or usefulness of various types of online QPLs, either surrogate or direct, have not yet been established, which makes it difficult to assess the value of the abundance of lists. Doctor endorsement of question asking has previously been shown to be an important factor in the effectiveness of QPLs, but information regarding this is not readily available online. Whether these diverse QPLs are endorsed by medical practitioners warrants further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7293062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72930622020-06-19 Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan Tracy, Marguerite Clare Shepherd, Heather L Patel, Pinika Trevena, Lyndal Jane J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in shared decision making (SDM) in Australia. Question prompt lists (QPLs) support question asking by patients, a key part of SDM. QPLs have been studied in a variety of settings, and increasingly the internet provides a source of suggested questions for patients. Environmental scans have been shown to be useful in assessing the availability and quality of online SDM tools. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the number and readability of QPLs available to users via Google.com.au. METHODS: Our environmental scan used search terms derived from literature and reputable websites to search for QPLs available via Google.com.au. Following removal of duplicates from the 4000 URLs and 22 reputable sites, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create a list of unique QPLs. A sample of 20 QPLs was further assessed for list length, proxy measures of quality such as a date of review, and evidence of doctor endorsement. Readability of the sample QPL instructions and QPLs themselves was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores. RESULTS: Our environmental scan identified 173 unique QPLs available to users. Lists ranged in length from 1 question to >200 questions. Of our sample, 50% (10/20) had a listed date of creation or update, and 60% (12/20) had evidence of authorship or source. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores for instructions were higher than for the QPLs (grades 10.3 and 7.7, respectively). There was over a 1 grade difference between QPLs from reputable sites compared with other sites (grades 4.2 and 5.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: People seeking questions to ask their doctor using Google.com.au encounter a vast number of question lists that they can use to prepare for consultations with their doctors. Markers of the quality or usefulness of various types of online QPLs, either surrogate or direct, have not yet been established, which makes it difficult to assess the value of the abundance of lists. Doctor endorsement of question asking has previously been shown to be an important factor in the effectiveness of QPLs, but information regarding this is not readily available online. Whether these diverse QPLs are endorsed by medical practitioners warrants further investigation. JMIR Publications 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7293062/ /pubmed/32469321 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17002 Text en ©Marguerite Clare Tracy, Heather L Shepherd, Pinika Patel, Lyndal Jane Trevena. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 29.05.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tracy, Marguerite Clare
Shepherd, Heather L
Patel, Pinika
Trevena, Lyndal Jane
Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan
title Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan
title_full Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan
title_fullStr Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan
title_short Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan
title_sort exploring the vast choice of question prompt lists available to health consumers via google: environmental scan
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469321
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17002
work_keys_str_mv AT tracymargueriteclare exploringthevastchoiceofquestionpromptlistsavailabletohealthconsumersviagoogleenvironmentalscan
AT shepherdheatherl exploringthevastchoiceofquestionpromptlistsavailabletohealthconsumersviagoogleenvironmentalscan
AT patelpinika exploringthevastchoiceofquestionpromptlistsavailabletohealthconsumersviagoogleenvironmentalscan
AT trevenalyndaljane exploringthevastchoiceofquestionpromptlistsavailabletohealthconsumersviagoogleenvironmentalscan