Cargando…

Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computed tomography portal venography (CTPV) shows potential in detecting varices that need treatment and their drainage pathways. However, its agreement with endoscopy requires further study. We investigated the feasibility of CTPV as an alternative tool to endoscopy in screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Zijin, Yang, Haiqing, Jin, Xiaoxu, Jiang, Huiqing, Qi, Wei, Feng, Wenfeng, Feng, Zhijie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6268570
_version_ 1783546351997419520
author Cui, Zijin
Yang, Haiqing
Jin, Xiaoxu
Jiang, Huiqing
Qi, Wei
Feng, Wenfeng
Feng, Zhijie
author_facet Cui, Zijin
Yang, Haiqing
Jin, Xiaoxu
Jiang, Huiqing
Qi, Wei
Feng, Wenfeng
Feng, Zhijie
author_sort Cui, Zijin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computed tomography portal venography (CTPV) shows potential in detecting varices that need treatment and their drainage pathways. However, its agreement with endoscopy requires further study. We investigated the feasibility of CTPV as an alternative tool to endoscopy in screening gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) and developed a CTPV-based model to provide a less invasive assessment of endotherapy for cirrhotic patients with GEVs. METHODS: The study included 33 cirrhotic patients with a recent history of variceal hemorrhage. The presence, grade, and classification of GEVs on endoscopy and CTPV were compared (kappa test). Twenty-four patients were treated endoscopically, including 12 for esophageal varices (EVs), 8 for gastric varices (GVs), and 4 for GEVs. Treatment efficacies were assessed with the newly developed CTPV-based method at 1 week and 1 month after treatment. Efficiency evaluated by CTPV and endoscopy was compared by Fisher's exact test to determine whether CTPV is efficient in the assessment of endotherapy efficacy. RESULTS: For the screening and grading/classification of EVs and GVs, substantial agreement (EV kappa: 0.63 and 0.68; GV kappa: 0.62 and 0.75, respectively) was noted between endoscopy and CTPV. The therapeutic efficacy of EVs was higher when assessed by CTPV than when evaluated by endoscopy (37.50% vs. 12.50% at 1 week postoperation, P = 0.22; 62.50% vs. 25.00% at 1 month postoperation, P = 0.07), but without statistical significance. The same trend was also found in the assessment of therapeutic efficacy for GVs (25.00% vs. 16.67% at 1 week postoperation, P = 1; 58.33% vs. 41.67% at 1 month postoperation, P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: CTPV is comparable to endoscopy in the detection of GEVs and in the evaluation of endotherapy efficacy, which suggests that it could be a less invasive alternative for endoscopy in cirrhotic patients with GEVs needing treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7293743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72937432020-06-19 Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices Cui, Zijin Yang, Haiqing Jin, Xiaoxu Jiang, Huiqing Qi, Wei Feng, Wenfeng Feng, Zhijie Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computed tomography portal venography (CTPV) shows potential in detecting varices that need treatment and their drainage pathways. However, its agreement with endoscopy requires further study. We investigated the feasibility of CTPV as an alternative tool to endoscopy in screening gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) and developed a CTPV-based model to provide a less invasive assessment of endotherapy for cirrhotic patients with GEVs. METHODS: The study included 33 cirrhotic patients with a recent history of variceal hemorrhage. The presence, grade, and classification of GEVs on endoscopy and CTPV were compared (kappa test). Twenty-four patients were treated endoscopically, including 12 for esophageal varices (EVs), 8 for gastric varices (GVs), and 4 for GEVs. Treatment efficacies were assessed with the newly developed CTPV-based method at 1 week and 1 month after treatment. Efficiency evaluated by CTPV and endoscopy was compared by Fisher's exact test to determine whether CTPV is efficient in the assessment of endotherapy efficacy. RESULTS: For the screening and grading/classification of EVs and GVs, substantial agreement (EV kappa: 0.63 and 0.68; GV kappa: 0.62 and 0.75, respectively) was noted between endoscopy and CTPV. The therapeutic efficacy of EVs was higher when assessed by CTPV than when evaluated by endoscopy (37.50% vs. 12.50% at 1 week postoperation, P = 0.22; 62.50% vs. 25.00% at 1 month postoperation, P = 0.07), but without statistical significance. The same trend was also found in the assessment of therapeutic efficacy for GVs (25.00% vs. 16.67% at 1 week postoperation, P = 1; 58.33% vs. 41.67% at 1 month postoperation, P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: CTPV is comparable to endoscopy in the detection of GEVs and in the evaluation of endotherapy efficacy, which suggests that it could be a less invasive alternative for endoscopy in cirrhotic patients with GEVs needing treatment. Hindawi 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7293743/ /pubmed/32565783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6268570 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zijin Cui et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Cui, Zijin
Yang, Haiqing
Jin, Xiaoxu
Jiang, Huiqing
Qi, Wei
Feng, Wenfeng
Feng, Zhijie
Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices
title Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices
title_full Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices
title_fullStr Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices
title_short Efficacy of CTPV for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Assessment: Comparison with Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices
title_sort efficacy of ctpv for diagnostic and therapeutic assessment: comparison with endoscopy in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6268570
work_keys_str_mv AT cuizijin efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices
AT yanghaiqing efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices
AT jinxiaoxu efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices
AT jianghuiqing efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices
AT qiwei efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices
AT fengwenfeng efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices
AT fengzhijie efficacyofctpvfordiagnosticandtherapeuticassessmentcomparisonwithendoscopyincirrhoticpatientswithgastroesophagealvarices