Cargando…
Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition
In the context of interventional cardiology, platelet function testing may identify patients treated with P2Y12-inhibitors at an increased risk of mortality, thrombosis and bleeding. Several whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers are available; however, inter-device differences have n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01971-1 |
_version_ | 1783546387823067136 |
---|---|
author | Dias, Joao D. Pottgiesser, Torben Hartmann, Jan Duerschmied, Daniel Bode, Christoph Achneck, Hardean E. |
author_facet | Dias, Joao D. Pottgiesser, Torben Hartmann, Jan Duerschmied, Daniel Bode, Christoph Achneck, Hardean E. |
author_sort | Dias, Joao D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the context of interventional cardiology, platelet function testing may identify patients treated with P2Y12-inhibitors at an increased risk of mortality, thrombosis and bleeding. Several whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers are available; however, inter-device differences have not been examined systematically. To compare three platelet function tests under standardized in vitro conditions. Healthy volunteer (n = 10) blood samples were spiked with increasing concentrations of ticagrelor (0–7500 ng/mL) and/or ASA (0–3280 ng/mL), measured on three platelet function analyzers (TEG(®)6s, Multiplate(®), and VerifyNow(®)) and respective Effective Concentration (EC) levels EC10, EC50 and EC90 were calculated. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of pooled blood samples (n = 10) spiked with ticagrelor at EC10, EC50 and EC90. ASA had no impact on ADP-activated channels for all three devices. TEG(®)6s was able to distinguish (p ≤ 0.05) between all ticagrelor EC zones; VerifyNow(®) and Multiplate(®) were able to distinguish between three and two zones, respectively. Multiplate(®) showed the largest window between EC10 and EC90 (19–9153 ng/mL), followed by TEG(®)6s (144–2589 ng/mL), and VerifyNow(®) (191–1100 ng/mL). Drug effect models distribution of disagreements were identified for TEG(®)6s (5.0%), VerifyNow(®) (8.3%), and Multiplate(®) (13.3%). TEG(®)6s showed the smallest average coefficient of variation between EC conditions (5.1%), followed by Multiplate(®) (14.1%), and VerifyNow(®) (17.7%). Linear models could be generated between TEG(®)6s and Multiplate(®), but not VerifyNow(®). Significant differences were found between whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers and the clinical impact of these differences needs to be further investigated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11239-019-01971-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7293977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72939772020-06-16 Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition Dias, Joao D. Pottgiesser, Torben Hartmann, Jan Duerschmied, Daniel Bode, Christoph Achneck, Hardean E. J Thromb Thrombolysis Article In the context of interventional cardiology, platelet function testing may identify patients treated with P2Y12-inhibitors at an increased risk of mortality, thrombosis and bleeding. Several whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers are available; however, inter-device differences have not been examined systematically. To compare three platelet function tests under standardized in vitro conditions. Healthy volunteer (n = 10) blood samples were spiked with increasing concentrations of ticagrelor (0–7500 ng/mL) and/or ASA (0–3280 ng/mL), measured on three platelet function analyzers (TEG(®)6s, Multiplate(®), and VerifyNow(®)) and respective Effective Concentration (EC) levels EC10, EC50 and EC90 were calculated. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of pooled blood samples (n = 10) spiked with ticagrelor at EC10, EC50 and EC90. ASA had no impact on ADP-activated channels for all three devices. TEG(®)6s was able to distinguish (p ≤ 0.05) between all ticagrelor EC zones; VerifyNow(®) and Multiplate(®) were able to distinguish between three and two zones, respectively. Multiplate(®) showed the largest window between EC10 and EC90 (19–9153 ng/mL), followed by TEG(®)6s (144–2589 ng/mL), and VerifyNow(®) (191–1100 ng/mL). Drug effect models distribution of disagreements were identified for TEG(®)6s (5.0%), VerifyNow(®) (8.3%), and Multiplate(®) (13.3%). TEG(®)6s showed the smallest average coefficient of variation between EC conditions (5.1%), followed by Multiplate(®) (14.1%), and VerifyNow(®) (17.7%). Linear models could be generated between TEG(®)6s and Multiplate(®), but not VerifyNow(®). Significant differences were found between whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers and the clinical impact of these differences needs to be further investigated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11239-019-01971-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-10-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7293977/ /pubmed/31620937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01971-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Dias, Joao D. Pottgiesser, Torben Hartmann, Jan Duerschmied, Daniel Bode, Christoph Achneck, Hardean E. Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition |
title | Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition |
title_full | Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition |
title_short | Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition |
title_sort | comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro p2y12 induced platelet inhibition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01971-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diasjoaod comparisonofthreecommonwholebloodplateletfunctiontestsforinvitrop2y12inducedplateletinhibition AT pottgiessertorben comparisonofthreecommonwholebloodplateletfunctiontestsforinvitrop2y12inducedplateletinhibition AT hartmannjan comparisonofthreecommonwholebloodplateletfunctiontestsforinvitrop2y12inducedplateletinhibition AT duerschmieddaniel comparisonofthreecommonwholebloodplateletfunctiontestsforinvitrop2y12inducedplateletinhibition AT bodechristoph comparisonofthreecommonwholebloodplateletfunctiontestsforinvitrop2y12inducedplateletinhibition AT achneckhardeane comparisonofthreecommonwholebloodplateletfunctiontestsforinvitrop2y12inducedplateletinhibition |