Cargando…

An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database

INTRODUCTION: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a clinical oncology database utilized by many researchers and clinicians internationally. We sought to investigate the various trends in data of two of the most common cancers, breast and lung, published using the NCDB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshotels, Leigh, Chaaya, Gerard, Komiya, Takefumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31983179
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.163
_version_ 1783546397754130432
author Deshotels, Leigh
Chaaya, Gerard
Komiya, Takefumi
author_facet Deshotels, Leigh
Chaaya, Gerard
Komiya, Takefumi
author_sort Deshotels, Leigh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a clinical oncology database utilized by many researchers and clinicians internationally. We sought to investigate the various trends in data of two of the most common cancers, breast and lung, published using the NCDB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected a multitude of pre-determined variables for analysis. We then performed two separate literature searches using an advanced PubMed search builder, and the data was combined to determine each variables’ association with journal impact factor (IF) using both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 191 published studies were identified. We found that a journal IF > 5 was associated with a publication year prior to 2017 (univariate analysis OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.38-5.21, p-value 0.004 and multivariate analysis OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.62-7.42, p-value 0.001) and a sample size > 10,000 (univariate analysis OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.43-7.50, p-value 0.005 and multivariate analysis OR 4.68, 95% CI 1.89-11.6, p-value 0.0008). Variables such as number of authors, region, cancer type, stage, treatment outcome and treatment incidence were not significant for an association with an IF >5. CONCLUSION: Based on our data, studies published after 2017 using the NCDB were associated with a lower IF. This could suggest that the quality of the NCDB data may be declining over time, or NCDB is becoming more widely used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7294020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72940202020-06-29 An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database Deshotels, Leigh Chaaya, Gerard Komiya, Takefumi Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article INTRODUCTION: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a clinical oncology database utilized by many researchers and clinicians internationally. We sought to investigate the various trends in data of two of the most common cancers, breast and lung, published using the NCDB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected a multitude of pre-determined variables for analysis. We then performed two separate literature searches using an advanced PubMed search builder, and the data was combined to determine each variables’ association with journal impact factor (IF) using both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 191 published studies were identified. We found that a journal IF > 5 was associated with a publication year prior to 2017 (univariate analysis OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.38-5.21, p-value 0.004 and multivariate analysis OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.62-7.42, p-value 0.001) and a sample size > 10,000 (univariate analysis OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.43-7.50, p-value 0.005 and multivariate analysis OR 4.68, 95% CI 1.89-11.6, p-value 0.0008). Variables such as number of authors, region, cancer type, stage, treatment outcome and treatment incidence were not significant for an association with an IF >5. CONCLUSION: Based on our data, studies published after 2017 using the NCDB were associated with a lower IF. This could suggest that the quality of the NCDB data may be declining over time, or NCDB is becoming more widely used. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7294020/ /pubmed/31983179 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.163 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deshotels, Leigh
Chaaya, Gerard
Komiya, Takefumi
An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
title An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
title_full An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
title_fullStr An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
title_short An Overview of Lung and Breast Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
title_sort overview of lung and breast cancer using the national cancer database
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31983179
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.163
work_keys_str_mv AT deshotelsleigh anoverviewoflungandbreastcancerusingthenationalcancerdatabase
AT chaayagerard anoverviewoflungandbreastcancerusingthenationalcancerdatabase
AT komiyatakefumi anoverviewoflungandbreastcancerusingthenationalcancerdatabase
AT deshotelsleigh overviewoflungandbreastcancerusingthenationalcancerdatabase
AT chaayagerard overviewoflungandbreastcancerusingthenationalcancerdatabase
AT komiyatakefumi overviewoflungandbreastcancerusingthenationalcancerdatabase