Cargando…

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced recruitment lung volume using passive spirometry is based on the assumption that the functional residual capacity (FRC) is not modified by the PEEP changes. We aimed to investigate the influence of PEEP on FRC in different mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yu-Mei, Sun, Xiu-Mei, Zhou, Yi-Min, Chen, Jing-Ran, Cheng, Kun-Ming, Li, Hong-Liang, Yang, Yan-Lin, Zhou, Jian-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520920426
_version_ 1783546479837708288
author Wang, Yu-Mei
Sun, Xiu-Mei
Zhou, Yi-Min
Chen, Jing-Ran
Cheng, Kun-Ming
Li, Hong-Liang
Yang, Yan-Lin
Zhou, Jian-Xin
author_facet Wang, Yu-Mei
Sun, Xiu-Mei
Zhou, Yi-Min
Chen, Jing-Ran
Cheng, Kun-Ming
Li, Hong-Liang
Yang, Yan-Lin
Zhou, Jian-Xin
author_sort Wang, Yu-Mei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Measurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced recruitment lung volume using passive spirometry is based on the assumption that the functional residual capacity (FRC) is not modified by the PEEP changes. We aimed to investigate the influence of PEEP on FRC in different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A randomized crossover study was performed in 12 pigs. Pulmonary (n = 6) and extra-pulmonary (n = 6) ARDS models were established using an alveolar instillation of hydrochloric acid and a right atrium injection of oleic acid, respectively. Low (5 cmH(2)O) and high (15 cmH(2)O) PEEP were randomly applied in each animal. FRC and recruitment volume were determined using the nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique and release maneuver. RESULTS: FRC was not significantly different between the two PEEP levels in either pulmonary ARDS (299 ± 92 mL and 309 ± 130 mL at 5 and 15 cmH(2)O, respectively) or extra-pulmonary ARDS (305 ± 143 mL and 328 ± 197 mL at 5 and 15 cmH(2)O, respectively). The recruitment volume was not significantly different between the two models (pulmonary, 341 ± 100 mL; extra-pulmonary, 351 ± 170 mL). CONCLUSIONS: PEEP did not influence FRC in either the pulmonary or extra-pulmonary ARDS pig model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7294389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72943892020-06-24 Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome Wang, Yu-Mei Sun, Xiu-Mei Zhou, Yi-Min Chen, Jing-Ran Cheng, Kun-Ming Li, Hong-Liang Yang, Yan-Lin Zhou, Jian-Xin J Int Med Res Pre-Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Measurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced recruitment lung volume using passive spirometry is based on the assumption that the functional residual capacity (FRC) is not modified by the PEEP changes. We aimed to investigate the influence of PEEP on FRC in different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A randomized crossover study was performed in 12 pigs. Pulmonary (n = 6) and extra-pulmonary (n = 6) ARDS models were established using an alveolar instillation of hydrochloric acid and a right atrium injection of oleic acid, respectively. Low (5 cmH(2)O) and high (15 cmH(2)O) PEEP were randomly applied in each animal. FRC and recruitment volume were determined using the nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique and release maneuver. RESULTS: FRC was not significantly different between the two PEEP levels in either pulmonary ARDS (299 ± 92 mL and 309 ± 130 mL at 5 and 15 cmH(2)O, respectively) or extra-pulmonary ARDS (305 ± 143 mL and 328 ± 197 mL at 5 and 15 cmH(2)O, respectively). The recruitment volume was not significantly different between the two models (pulmonary, 341 ± 100 mL; extra-pulmonary, 351 ± 170 mL). CONCLUSIONS: PEEP did not influence FRC in either the pulmonary or extra-pulmonary ARDS pig model. SAGE Publications 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7294389/ /pubmed/32529868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520920426 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Pre-Clinical Research Report
Wang, Yu-Mei
Sun, Xiu-Mei
Zhou, Yi-Min
Chen, Jing-Ran
Cheng, Kun-Ming
Li, Hong-Liang
Yang, Yan-Lin
Zhou, Jian-Xin
Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
title Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_fullStr Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_short Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_sort effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome
topic Pre-Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520920426
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyumei effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT sunxiumei effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT zhouyimin effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT chenjingran effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT chengkunming effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT lihongliang effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT yangyanlin effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT zhoujianxin effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureonfunctionalresidualcapacityintwoexperimentalmodelsofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome