Cargando…

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients

OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dyn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarze, Vincent, Marschner, Constantin, Völckers, Wiebke, Grosu, Sergio, Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna, Rübenthaler, Johannes, Clevert, Dirk-André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520930151
_version_ 1783546501603000320
author Schwarze, Vincent
Marschner, Constantin
Völckers, Wiebke
Grosu, Sergio
Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna
Rübenthaler, Johannes
Clevert, Dirk-André
author_facet Schwarze, Vincent
Marschner, Constantin
Völckers, Wiebke
Grosu, Sergio
Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna
Rübenthaler, Johannes
Clevert, Dirk-André
author_sort Schwarze, Vincent
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dynamic assessment of the microperfusion pattern of suspicious liver lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS compared with CT scans for assessing HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study between 2004 and 2018 on 234 patients with suspicious liver lesions who underwent CEUS and CT examinations. All patients underwent native B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS after providing informed consent. Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level 3). RESULTS: CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 72% for analyzing HCC compared with CT as the diagnostic gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent safety profile and shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared with corresponding results from CT scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7294502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72945022020-06-24 Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients Schwarze, Vincent Marschner, Constantin Völckers, Wiebke Grosu, Sergio Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna Rübenthaler, Johannes Clevert, Dirk-André J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dynamic assessment of the microperfusion pattern of suspicious liver lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS compared with CT scans for assessing HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study between 2004 and 2018 on 234 patients with suspicious liver lesions who underwent CEUS and CT examinations. All patients underwent native B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS after providing informed consent. Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level 3). RESULTS: CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 72% for analyzing HCC compared with CT as the diagnostic gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent safety profile and shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared with corresponding results from CT scans. SAGE Publications 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7294502/ /pubmed/32529869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520930151 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Schwarze, Vincent
Marschner, Constantin
Völckers, Wiebke
Grosu, Sergio
Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna
Rübenthaler, Johannes
Clevert, Dirk-André
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
title Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
title_full Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
title_short Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
title_sort diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520930151
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarzevincent diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients
AT marschnerconstantin diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients
AT volckerswiebke diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients
AT grosusergio diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients
AT negraodefigueiredogiovanna diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients
AT rubenthalerjohannes diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients
AT clevertdirkandre diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients