Cargando…
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients
OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dyn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520930151 |
_version_ | 1783546501603000320 |
---|---|
author | Schwarze, Vincent Marschner, Constantin Völckers, Wiebke Grosu, Sergio Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna Rübenthaler, Johannes Clevert, Dirk-André |
author_facet | Schwarze, Vincent Marschner, Constantin Völckers, Wiebke Grosu, Sergio Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna Rübenthaler, Johannes Clevert, Dirk-André |
author_sort | Schwarze, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dynamic assessment of the microperfusion pattern of suspicious liver lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS compared with CT scans for assessing HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study between 2004 and 2018 on 234 patients with suspicious liver lesions who underwent CEUS and CT examinations. All patients underwent native B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS after providing informed consent. Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level 3). RESULTS: CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 72% for analyzing HCC compared with CT as the diagnostic gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent safety profile and shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared with corresponding results from CT scans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7294502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72945022020-06-24 Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients Schwarze, Vincent Marschner, Constantin Völckers, Wiebke Grosu, Sergio Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna Rübenthaler, Johannes Clevert, Dirk-André J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of primary liver cancer. A major part of diagnostic HCC work-up is based on imaging findings from sonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows for the dynamic assessment of the microperfusion pattern of suspicious liver lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS compared with CT scans for assessing HCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study between 2004 and 2018 on 234 patients with suspicious liver lesions who underwent CEUS and CT examinations. All patients underwent native B-mode, color Doppler and CEUS after providing informed consent. Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level 3). RESULTS: CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 70%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 72% for analyzing HCC compared with CT as the diagnostic gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has an excellent safety profile and shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared with corresponding results from CT scans. SAGE Publications 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7294502/ /pubmed/32529869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520930151 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Clinical Research Report Schwarze, Vincent Marschner, Constantin Völckers, Wiebke Grosu, Sergio Negrão de Figueiredo, Giovanna Rübenthaler, Johannes Clevert, Dirk-André Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
title | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
title_full | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
title_short | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
title_sort | diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients |
topic | Retrospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520930151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwarzevincent diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients AT marschnerconstantin diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients AT volckerswiebke diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients AT grosusergio diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients AT negraodefigueiredogiovanna diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients AT rubenthalerjohannes diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients AT clevertdirkandre diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyforhepatocellularcarcinomaaretrospectivesinglecenterevaluationof234patients |