Cargando…

The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus

PURPOSE: The threat of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide. Niosomes are a new drug delivery system that enhances the antimicrobial potential of antibiotics. We hereby aim to evaluate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashef, Mona T, Saleh, Nehal M, Assar, Nouran H, Ramadan, Mohammed A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606813
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S249628
_version_ 1783546509799718912
author Kashef, Mona T
Saleh, Nehal M
Assar, Nouran H
Ramadan, Mohammed A
author_facet Kashef, Mona T
Saleh, Nehal M
Assar, Nouran H
Ramadan, Mohammed A
author_sort Kashef, Mona T
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The threat of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide. Niosomes are a new drug delivery system that enhances the antimicrobial potential of antibiotics. We hereby aim to evaluate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes. METHODS: The antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical S. aureus isolates (n=59) was determined by Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method. Their biofilm formation activity was tested by Christensen’s method. Two ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomal formulations were prepared by thin-film hydration method, and their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by agar dilution method, against ciprofloxacin-resistant and biofilm-forming isolates (n=24). Their ability to inhibit biofilm formation and eradicate already formed biofilms was evaluated and further confirmed by scanning electron microscope images. Non-synonymous mutations, in a quinolone resistance-determining regions of S. aureus isolates, were detected by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Most of the isolates were methicillin- (47/59) and ciprofloxacin-resistant (45/59). All except two isolates were capable of biofilm production. Niosomal preparation I reduced ciprofloxacin MIC by twofold in four isolates, whereas preparation II reduced ciprofloxacin MIC of most isolates by 8- to 32-fold, with three isolates that became ciprofloxacin-susceptible. Non-synonymous mutations were detected in isolates that maintained phenotypic ciprofloxacin resistance against ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomal preparation II. Ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes reduced the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration and the minimum biofilm eradication concentration in 58% and 62% of the tested isolates, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes can restore ciprofloxacin activity against resistant S. aureus isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the inhibition of biofilm formation and eradication of formed biofilms by ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7294563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72945632020-06-29 The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus Kashef, Mona T Saleh, Nehal M Assar, Nouran H Ramadan, Mohammed A Infect Drug Resist Original Research PURPOSE: The threat of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide. Niosomes are a new drug delivery system that enhances the antimicrobial potential of antibiotics. We hereby aim to evaluate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes. METHODS: The antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical S. aureus isolates (n=59) was determined by Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method. Their biofilm formation activity was tested by Christensen’s method. Two ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomal formulations were prepared by thin-film hydration method, and their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by agar dilution method, against ciprofloxacin-resistant and biofilm-forming isolates (n=24). Their ability to inhibit biofilm formation and eradicate already formed biofilms was evaluated and further confirmed by scanning electron microscope images. Non-synonymous mutations, in a quinolone resistance-determining regions of S. aureus isolates, were detected by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Most of the isolates were methicillin- (47/59) and ciprofloxacin-resistant (45/59). All except two isolates were capable of biofilm production. Niosomal preparation I reduced ciprofloxacin MIC by twofold in four isolates, whereas preparation II reduced ciprofloxacin MIC of most isolates by 8- to 32-fold, with three isolates that became ciprofloxacin-susceptible. Non-synonymous mutations were detected in isolates that maintained phenotypic ciprofloxacin resistance against ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomal preparation II. Ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes reduced the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration and the minimum biofilm eradication concentration in 58% and 62% of the tested isolates, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes can restore ciprofloxacin activity against resistant S. aureus isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the inhibition of biofilm formation and eradication of formed biofilms by ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes. Dove 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7294563/ /pubmed/32606813 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S249628 Text en © 2020 Kashef et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kashef, Mona T
Saleh, Nehal M
Assar, Nouran H
Ramadan, Mohammed A
The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus
title The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus
title_full The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus
title_short The Antimicrobial Activity of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Niosomes against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin-loaded niosomes against ciprofloxacin-resistant and biofilm-forming staphylococcus aureus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606813
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S249628
work_keys_str_mv AT kashefmonat theantimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT salehnehalm theantimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT assarnouranh theantimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT ramadanmohammeda theantimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT kashefmonat antimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT salehnehalm antimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT assarnouranh antimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus
AT ramadanmohammeda antimicrobialactivityofciprofloxacinloadedniosomesagainstciprofloxacinresistantandbiofilmformingstaphylococcusaureus