Cargando…

Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs

The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moldovan, Nicanor I., Moldovan, Leni, Raghunath, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596531
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167
_version_ 1783546534874316800
author Moldovan, Nicanor I.
Moldovan, Leni
Raghunath, Michael
author_facet Moldovan, Nicanor I.
Moldovan, Leni
Raghunath, Michael
author_sort Moldovan, Nicanor I.
collection PubMed
description The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerable combinatorial bandwidth: (i) Support structures are generated first, and cells are seeded subsequently; (ii) alternatively, cells are delivered in a printing medium, so-called “bioink,” that contains them during the printing process and ensures shape fidelity of the generated structure; and (iii) a “scaffold-free” version of bioprinting, where only cells are used and the extracellular matrix is produced by the cells themselves, also recently entered a phase of accelerated development and successful applications. However, the scaffold-free approaches may still benefit from secondary incorporation of scaffolding materials, thus expanding their versatility. Reversibly, the bioink-based bioprinting could also be improved by adopting some of the principles and practices of scaffold-free biofabrication. Collectively, we anticipate that combinations of these complementary methods in a “hybrid” approach, rather than their development in separate technological niches, will largely increase their efficiency and applicability in tissue engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7294696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72946962020-06-25 Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs Moldovan, Nicanor I. Moldovan, Leni Raghunath, Michael Int J Bioprint Review Article The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerable combinatorial bandwidth: (i) Support structures are generated first, and cells are seeded subsequently; (ii) alternatively, cells are delivered in a printing medium, so-called “bioink,” that contains them during the printing process and ensures shape fidelity of the generated structure; and (iii) a “scaffold-free” version of bioprinting, where only cells are used and the extracellular matrix is produced by the cells themselves, also recently entered a phase of accelerated development and successful applications. However, the scaffold-free approaches may still benefit from secondary incorporation of scaffolding materials, thus expanding their versatility. Reversibly, the bioink-based bioprinting could also be improved by adopting some of the principles and practices of scaffold-free biofabrication. Collectively, we anticipate that combinations of these complementary methods in a “hybrid” approach, rather than their development in separate technological niches, will largely increase their efficiency and applicability in tissue engineering. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2018-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7294696/ /pubmed/32596531 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167 Text en Copyright: © 2019 N I. Moldovan , et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Moldovan, Nicanor I.
Moldovan, Leni
Raghunath, Michael
Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
title Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
title_full Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
title_fullStr Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
title_full_unstemmed Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
title_short Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
title_sort of balls, inks and cages: hybrid biofabrication of 3d tissue analogs
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596531
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167
work_keys_str_mv AT moldovannicanori ofballsinksandcageshybridbiofabricationof3dtissueanalogs
AT moldovanleni ofballsinksandcageshybridbiofabricationof3dtissueanalogs
AT raghunathmichael ofballsinksandcageshybridbiofabricationof3dtissueanalogs