Cargando…
Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerab...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596531 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167 |
_version_ | 1783546534874316800 |
---|---|
author | Moldovan, Nicanor I. Moldovan, Leni Raghunath, Michael |
author_facet | Moldovan, Nicanor I. Moldovan, Leni Raghunath, Michael |
author_sort | Moldovan, Nicanor I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerable combinatorial bandwidth: (i) Support structures are generated first, and cells are seeded subsequently; (ii) alternatively, cells are delivered in a printing medium, so-called “bioink,” that contains them during the printing process and ensures shape fidelity of the generated structure; and (iii) a “scaffold-free” version of bioprinting, where only cells are used and the extracellular matrix is produced by the cells themselves, also recently entered a phase of accelerated development and successful applications. However, the scaffold-free approaches may still benefit from secondary incorporation of scaffolding materials, thus expanding their versatility. Reversibly, the bioink-based bioprinting could also be improved by adopting some of the principles and practices of scaffold-free biofabrication. Collectively, we anticipate that combinations of these complementary methods in a “hybrid” approach, rather than their development in separate technological niches, will largely increase their efficiency and applicability in tissue engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7294696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72946962020-06-25 Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs Moldovan, Nicanor I. Moldovan, Leni Raghunath, Michael Int J Bioprint Review Article The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerable combinatorial bandwidth: (i) Support structures are generated first, and cells are seeded subsequently; (ii) alternatively, cells are delivered in a printing medium, so-called “bioink,” that contains them during the printing process and ensures shape fidelity of the generated structure; and (iii) a “scaffold-free” version of bioprinting, where only cells are used and the extracellular matrix is produced by the cells themselves, also recently entered a phase of accelerated development and successful applications. However, the scaffold-free approaches may still benefit from secondary incorporation of scaffolding materials, thus expanding their versatility. Reversibly, the bioink-based bioprinting could also be improved by adopting some of the principles and practices of scaffold-free biofabrication. Collectively, we anticipate that combinations of these complementary methods in a “hybrid” approach, rather than their development in separate technological niches, will largely increase their efficiency and applicability in tissue engineering. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2018-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7294696/ /pubmed/32596531 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167 Text en Copyright: © 2019 N I. Moldovan , et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Moldovan, Nicanor I. Moldovan, Leni Raghunath, Michael Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs |
title | Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs |
title_full | Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs |
title_fullStr | Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs |
title_short | Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs |
title_sort | of balls, inks and cages: hybrid biofabrication of 3d tissue analogs |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596531 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moldovannicanori ofballsinksandcageshybridbiofabricationof3dtissueanalogs AT moldovanleni ofballsinksandcageshybridbiofabricationof3dtissueanalogs AT raghunathmichael ofballsinksandcageshybridbiofabricationof3dtissueanalogs |