Cargando…

Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation

INTRODUCTION: Digital rectal examination (DRE) and balloon expulsion test (BET) are simple tests to diagnose dyssynergic defecation (DD). AIM: To determine differences in symptoms and manometry findings in patients with abnormal BET and normal BET. The secondary objective was to ascertain the sensit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Mayank, Singh, Saransh, Baijal, Rajiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550948
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2020.95558
_version_ 1783546577396170752
author Jain, Mayank
Singh, Saransh
Baijal, Rajiv
author_facet Jain, Mayank
Singh, Saransh
Baijal, Rajiv
author_sort Jain, Mayank
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Digital rectal examination (DRE) and balloon expulsion test (BET) are simple tests to diagnose dyssynergic defecation (DD). AIM: To determine differences in symptoms and manometry findings in patients with abnormal BET and normal BET. The secondary objective was to ascertain the sensitivity and specificity of BET and DRE + BET for the diagnosis of DD in an Indian setting using ARM findings as the gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with chronic constipation referred for anorectal manometry (ARM) between December 2012 and March 2019. DD was diagnosed using ARM. Findings on BET and, in a subset of cases, on DRE + BET were compared with ARM findings. The data were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Agreement of BET and DRE + BET with ARM was calculated using Cohen’s κ coefficient. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 1006 cases (734 males, 73%) formed the study cohort. Patients with abnormal BET more frequently reported digitation, bleeding per rectum, and straining (p < 0.00001). Moreover, they had a significantly higher median basal pressure compared to those with normal BET (80 vs. 67, p = 0.03). DD was significantly more common in those with abnormal BET. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BET in detecting DD were 28.29%, 97.15%, 81.13%, and 75.78%, respectively. The percentage of agreement was 76.34%, and there was fair degree of correlation between the two tests. In a smaller subset of cases (166), DRE and BET findings were both available for analysis. We noted that the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of combined DRE + BET were 57.63%, 88.79%, 73.91%, and 79.17%, respectively. The Cohen’s κ correlation coefficient was 0.49, suggesting moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abnormal BET more frequently report digitation, straining, and bleeding per rectum, and have higher resting anal pressure. BET is a good screening test for DD in an Indian setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7294974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72949742020-06-17 Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation Jain, Mayank Singh, Saransh Baijal, Rajiv Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Digital rectal examination (DRE) and balloon expulsion test (BET) are simple tests to diagnose dyssynergic defecation (DD). AIM: To determine differences in symptoms and manometry findings in patients with abnormal BET and normal BET. The secondary objective was to ascertain the sensitivity and specificity of BET and DRE + BET for the diagnosis of DD in an Indian setting using ARM findings as the gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with chronic constipation referred for anorectal manometry (ARM) between December 2012 and March 2019. DD was diagnosed using ARM. Findings on BET and, in a subset of cases, on DRE + BET were compared with ARM findings. The data were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Agreement of BET and DRE + BET with ARM was calculated using Cohen’s κ coefficient. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 1006 cases (734 males, 73%) formed the study cohort. Patients with abnormal BET more frequently reported digitation, bleeding per rectum, and straining (p < 0.00001). Moreover, they had a significantly higher median basal pressure compared to those with normal BET (80 vs. 67, p = 0.03). DD was significantly more common in those with abnormal BET. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BET in detecting DD were 28.29%, 97.15%, 81.13%, and 75.78%, respectively. The percentage of agreement was 76.34%, and there was fair degree of correlation between the two tests. In a smaller subset of cases (166), DRE and BET findings were both available for analysis. We noted that the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of combined DRE + BET were 57.63%, 88.79%, 73.91%, and 79.17%, respectively. The Cohen’s κ correlation coefficient was 0.49, suggesting moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abnormal BET more frequently report digitation, straining, and bleeding per rectum, and have higher resting anal pressure. BET is a good screening test for DD in an Indian setting. Termedia Publishing House 2020-06-08 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7294974/ /pubmed/32550948 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2020.95558 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jain, Mayank
Singh, Saransh
Baijal, Rajiv
Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
title Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
title_full Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
title_short Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
title_sort diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in indian patients with dyssynergic defecation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550948
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2020.95558
work_keys_str_mv AT jainmayank diagnosticvalueoftheballoonexpulsiontestcomparedwithanorectalmanometryinindianpatientswithdyssynergicdefecation
AT singhsaransh diagnosticvalueoftheballoonexpulsiontestcomparedwithanorectalmanometryinindianpatientswithdyssynergicdefecation
AT baijalrajiv diagnosticvalueoftheballoonexpulsiontestcomparedwithanorectalmanometryinindianpatientswithdyssynergicdefecation