Cargando…
What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol
Background: There is much concern at the substantial vulnerabilities experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI+) youth as a consequence of discrimination, stigmatisation and marginalisation. Recent research highlights the importance of understanding factors that can prom...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566894 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13018.2 |
_version_ | 1783546594443919360 |
---|---|
author | Ceatha, Nerilee Bustillo, Marta Tully, Louise James, Oscar Crowley, Des |
author_facet | Ceatha, Nerilee Bustillo, Marta Tully, Louise James, Oscar Crowley, Des |
author_sort | Ceatha, Nerilee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is much concern at the substantial vulnerabilities experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI+) youth as a consequence of discrimination, stigmatisation and marginalisation. Recent research highlights the importance of understanding factors that can promote wellbeing for this population. This paper presents a protocol for a scoping review which aims to systematically map and synthesise the extent and nature of the peer-reviewed, published and unpublished academic literature on the protective factors that promote wellbeing for sexual and gender minority young people. Methods: In accordance with the methodological framework for scoping reviews, the following six stages will be undertaken: (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating, summarising and reporting results and (6) consultation. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation will be used throughout the review process. Key inclusion criteria will use the Population, Concept, Context approach, with two reviewers independently conducting the screening and extraction stages across five databases. Identified protective factors will be collated, summarised and categorised iteratively by one reviewer in consultation with the review team. Stakeholder consultation is a key strength of the scoping review process and will be complemented by the public patient involvement of LGBTI+ young people with expertise by experience. Conclusions: The scoping review has the potential to inform policy, practice and future research through enhanced understandings of the complex interplay of factors that promote wellbeing for sexual minority, gender minority and intersex youth. This first stage of the research process will inform the development of a larger research project. The findings will be disseminated through a peer reviewed publication, a conference presentation and by sharing the findings with key stakeholders, including LGBTI+ young people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72950802020-06-19 What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol Ceatha, Nerilee Bustillo, Marta Tully, Louise James, Oscar Crowley, Des HRB Open Res Study Protocol Background: There is much concern at the substantial vulnerabilities experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI+) youth as a consequence of discrimination, stigmatisation and marginalisation. Recent research highlights the importance of understanding factors that can promote wellbeing for this population. This paper presents a protocol for a scoping review which aims to systematically map and synthesise the extent and nature of the peer-reviewed, published and unpublished academic literature on the protective factors that promote wellbeing for sexual and gender minority young people. Methods: In accordance with the methodological framework for scoping reviews, the following six stages will be undertaken: (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating, summarising and reporting results and (6) consultation. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation will be used throughout the review process. Key inclusion criteria will use the Population, Concept, Context approach, with two reviewers independently conducting the screening and extraction stages across five databases. Identified protective factors will be collated, summarised and categorised iteratively by one reviewer in consultation with the review team. Stakeholder consultation is a key strength of the scoping review process and will be complemented by the public patient involvement of LGBTI+ young people with expertise by experience. Conclusions: The scoping review has the potential to inform policy, practice and future research through enhanced understandings of the complex interplay of factors that promote wellbeing for sexual minority, gender minority and intersex youth. This first stage of the research process will inform the development of a larger research project. The findings will be disseminated through a peer reviewed publication, a conference presentation and by sharing the findings with key stakeholders, including LGBTI+ young people. F1000 Research Limited 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7295080/ /pubmed/32566894 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13018.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Ceatha N et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ceatha, Nerilee Bustillo, Marta Tully, Louise James, Oscar Crowley, Des What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol |
title | What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol |
title_full | What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol |
title_short | What is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing? A scoping review protocol |
title_sort | what is known about the protective factors that promote lgbti+ youth wellbeing? a scoping review protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566894 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13018.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ceathanerilee whatisknownabouttheprotectivefactorsthatpromotelgbtiyouthwellbeingascopingreviewprotocol AT bustillomarta whatisknownabouttheprotectivefactorsthatpromotelgbtiyouthwellbeingascopingreviewprotocol AT tullylouise whatisknownabouttheprotectivefactorsthatpromotelgbtiyouthwellbeingascopingreviewprotocol AT jamesoscar whatisknownabouttheprotectivefactorsthatpromotelgbtiyouthwellbeingascopingreviewprotocol AT crowleydes whatisknownabouttheprotectivefactorsthatpromotelgbtiyouthwellbeingascopingreviewprotocol |