Cargando…
Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies
We propose two new algorithms – Spring-Based MinorMiner (SPMM) and Clique-Based MinorMiner (CLMM) – which take as input the connectivity graph of a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem and produce as output an embedding of the input graph on a host graph that models the topolog...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295343/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50743-5_10 |
_version_ | 1783546632650883072 |
---|---|
author | Zbinden, Stefanie Bärtschi, Andreas Djidjev, Hristo Eidenbenz, Stephan |
author_facet | Zbinden, Stefanie Bärtschi, Andreas Djidjev, Hristo Eidenbenz, Stephan |
author_sort | Zbinden, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | We propose two new algorithms – Spring-Based MinorMiner (SPMM) and Clique-Based MinorMiner (CLMM) – which take as input the connectivity graph of a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem and produce as output an embedding of the input graph on a host graph that models the topology of a quantum computing device. As host graphs, we take the Chimera graph and the Pegasus graph, which are the topology graphs of D-Wave’s 2000 qubit (first introduced in 2017) and 5000 qubit (expected 2020) quantum annealer devices, respectively. We evaluate our algorithms on a large set of random graph QUBO inputs (Erdős-Rényi [Formula: see text], Barabási-Albert and d-regular graphs) on both host topologies against other embedding algorithms. For the Pegasus topology, we find that CLMM outperforms all other algorithms at edge densities larger than 0.08, while SPMM wins at edge densities smaller than 0.08 for Erdős-Rényi graphs, with very similar transition densities for the other graph classes. Surprisingly, the standard D-Wave MinorMiner embedding algorithm – while also getting slightly outperformed by SPMM for sparse and very dense graphs on Chimera – does not manage to extend its overall good performance on Chimera to Pegasus as it fails to embed even medium-density graphs on 175–180 nodes which are known to have clique embeddings on Pegasus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72953432020-06-16 Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies Zbinden, Stefanie Bärtschi, Andreas Djidjev, Hristo Eidenbenz, Stephan High Performance Computing Article We propose two new algorithms – Spring-Based MinorMiner (SPMM) and Clique-Based MinorMiner (CLMM) – which take as input the connectivity graph of a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem and produce as output an embedding of the input graph on a host graph that models the topology of a quantum computing device. As host graphs, we take the Chimera graph and the Pegasus graph, which are the topology graphs of D-Wave’s 2000 qubit (first introduced in 2017) and 5000 qubit (expected 2020) quantum annealer devices, respectively. We evaluate our algorithms on a large set of random graph QUBO inputs (Erdős-Rényi [Formula: see text], Barabási-Albert and d-regular graphs) on both host topologies against other embedding algorithms. For the Pegasus topology, we find that CLMM outperforms all other algorithms at edge densities larger than 0.08, while SPMM wins at edge densities smaller than 0.08 for Erdős-Rényi graphs, with very similar transition densities for the other graph classes. Surprisingly, the standard D-Wave MinorMiner embedding algorithm – while also getting slightly outperformed by SPMM for sparse and very dense graphs on Chimera – does not manage to extend its overall good performance on Chimera to Pegasus as it fails to embed even medium-density graphs on 175–180 nodes which are known to have clique embeddings on Pegasus. 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7295343/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50743-5_10 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Zbinden, Stefanie Bärtschi, Andreas Djidjev, Hristo Eidenbenz, Stephan Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies |
title | Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies |
title_full | Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies |
title_fullStr | Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies |
title_short | Embedding Algorithms for Quantum Annealers with Chimera and Pegasus Connection Topologies |
title_sort | embedding algorithms for quantum annealers with chimera and pegasus connection topologies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295343/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50743-5_10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zbindenstefanie embeddingalgorithmsforquantumannealerswithchimeraandpegasusconnectiontopologies AT bartschiandreas embeddingalgorithmsforquantumannealerswithchimeraandpegasusconnectiontopologies AT djidjevhristo embeddingalgorithmsforquantumannealerswithchimeraandpegasusconnectiontopologies AT eidenbenzstephan embeddingalgorithmsforquantumannealerswithchimeraandpegasusconnectiontopologies |