Cargando…
Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000604 |
_version_ | 1783546643559219200 |
---|---|
author | Haanen, John Ernstoff, Marc Wang, Yinghong Menzies, Alexander Puzanov, Igor Grivas, Petros Larkin, James Peters, Solange Thompson, John Obeid, Michel |
author_facet | Haanen, John Ernstoff, Marc Wang, Yinghong Menzies, Alexander Puzanov, Igor Grivas, Petros Larkin, James Peters, Solange Thompson, John Obeid, Michel |
author_sort | Haanen, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams are hesitant to retreat in this scenario, despite the fact that a number of patients may derive clinical benefit from this approach. Balancing such clinical benefit and treatment-related toxicities for each patient is becoming increasingly challenging as more and more patients with cancer are being treated with checkpoint inhibitors. In this manuscript, we provide an extensive overview of the relevant literature on retreatment after toxicity, and suggest prophylactic approaches to minimize the risk of severe irAE following rechallenge with immune checkpoint blockade, since treatment may be lifesaving in a number of occasions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72954252020-06-19 Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy Haanen, John Ernstoff, Marc Wang, Yinghong Menzies, Alexander Puzanov, Igor Grivas, Petros Larkin, James Peters, Solange Thompson, John Obeid, Michel J Immunother Cancer Commentary Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams are hesitant to retreat in this scenario, despite the fact that a number of patients may derive clinical benefit from this approach. Balancing such clinical benefit and treatment-related toxicities for each patient is becoming increasingly challenging as more and more patients with cancer are being treated with checkpoint inhibitors. In this manuscript, we provide an extensive overview of the relevant literature on retreatment after toxicity, and suggest prophylactic approaches to minimize the risk of severe irAE following rechallenge with immune checkpoint blockade, since treatment may be lifesaving in a number of occasions. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7295425/ /pubmed/32532839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000604 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Haanen, John Ernstoff, Marc Wang, Yinghong Menzies, Alexander Puzanov, Igor Grivas, Petros Larkin, James Peters, Solange Thompson, John Obeid, Michel Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
title | Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
title_full | Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
title_fullStr | Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
title_short | Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
title_sort | rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haanenjohn rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT ernstoffmarc rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT wangyinghong rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT menziesalexander rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT puzanovigor rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT grivaspetros rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT larkinjames rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT peterssolange rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT thompsonjohn rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy AT obeidmichel rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy |