Cargando…

Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy

Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haanen, John, Ernstoff, Marc, Wang, Yinghong, Menzies, Alexander, Puzanov, Igor, Grivas, Petros, Larkin, James, Peters, Solange, Thompson, John, Obeid, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000604
_version_ 1783546643559219200
author Haanen, John
Ernstoff, Marc
Wang, Yinghong
Menzies, Alexander
Puzanov, Igor
Grivas, Petros
Larkin, James
Peters, Solange
Thompson, John
Obeid, Michel
author_facet Haanen, John
Ernstoff, Marc
Wang, Yinghong
Menzies, Alexander
Puzanov, Igor
Grivas, Petros
Larkin, James
Peters, Solange
Thompson, John
Obeid, Michel
author_sort Haanen, John
collection PubMed
description Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams are hesitant to retreat in this scenario, despite the fact that a number of patients may derive clinical benefit from this approach. Balancing such clinical benefit and treatment-related toxicities for each patient is becoming increasingly challenging as more and more patients with cancer are being treated with checkpoint inhibitors. In this manuscript, we provide an extensive overview of the relevant literature on retreatment after toxicity, and suggest prophylactic approaches to minimize the risk of severe irAE following rechallenge with immune checkpoint blockade, since treatment may be lifesaving in a number of occasions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7295425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72954252020-06-19 Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy Haanen, John Ernstoff, Marc Wang, Yinghong Menzies, Alexander Puzanov, Igor Grivas, Petros Larkin, James Peters, Solange Thompson, John Obeid, Michel J Immunother Cancer Commentary Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams are hesitant to retreat in this scenario, despite the fact that a number of patients may derive clinical benefit from this approach. Balancing such clinical benefit and treatment-related toxicities for each patient is becoming increasingly challenging as more and more patients with cancer are being treated with checkpoint inhibitors. In this manuscript, we provide an extensive overview of the relevant literature on retreatment after toxicity, and suggest prophylactic approaches to minimize the risk of severe irAE following rechallenge with immune checkpoint blockade, since treatment may be lifesaving in a number of occasions. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7295425/ /pubmed/32532839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000604 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Commentary
Haanen, John
Ernstoff, Marc
Wang, Yinghong
Menzies, Alexander
Puzanov, Igor
Grivas, Petros
Larkin, James
Peters, Solange
Thompson, John
Obeid, Michel
Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
title Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
title_full Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
title_fullStr Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
title_full_unstemmed Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
title_short Rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
title_sort rechallenge patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors following severe immune-related adverse events: review of the literature and suggested prophylactic strategy
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000604
work_keys_str_mv AT haanenjohn rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT ernstoffmarc rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT wangyinghong rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT menziesalexander rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT puzanovigor rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT grivaspetros rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT larkinjames rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT peterssolange rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT thompsonjohn rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy
AT obeidmichel rechallengepatientswithimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfollowingsevereimmunerelatedadverseeventsreviewoftheliteratureandsuggestedprophylacticstrategy