Cargando…

Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: Little is routinely disclosed about the costs of the pivotal clinical trials that provide the key scientific evidence of the treatment benefits of new therapeutic agents. We expand our earlier research to examine why the estimated costs may vary 100-fold. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Thomas J, Heyward, James, Anderson, Gerard, Alexander, G Caleb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863
_version_ 1783546644476723200
author Moore, Thomas J
Heyward, James
Anderson, Gerard
Alexander, G Caleb
author_facet Moore, Thomas J
Heyward, James
Anderson, Gerard
Alexander, G Caleb
author_sort Moore, Thomas J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Little is routinely disclosed about the costs of the pivotal clinical trials that provide the key scientific evidence of the treatment benefits of new therapeutic agents. We expand our earlier research to examine why the estimated costs may vary 100-fold. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the estimated costs of the pivotal clinical trials supporting the approval of 101 new therapeutic agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2017. METHODS: We licensed a software tool used by the pharmaceutical industry to estimate the likely costs of clinical trials to be conducted by contract research organisations. For each trial we collected 52 study characteristics. Linear regression was used to assess the most important factors affecting costs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean and 95% CI of 225 pivotal clinical trials using varying assumptions. We also assessed median estimated costs per patient, per clinic visit and per drug. RESULTS: Measured as pivotal trials cost per approved drug, the 101 new molecular entities had an estimated median cost of US$48 million (IQR US$20 million–US$102 million). The 225 individual clinical trials had a median estimate of US$19 million (IQR US$12 million–US$33 million) per trial and US$41 413 (IQR, US$29 894–US$75 047) per patient. The largest single factor driving cost was the number of patients required to establish the treatment effects and varied from 4 patients to 8442. Next was the number of trial clinic visits, which ranged from 2 to 166. Our statistical model showed trial costs rose exponentially with these two variables (R(2)=0.696, F=257.9, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated costs are modest for measuring the benefits of new therapeutic agents but rise exponentially as more patients and clinic visits are required to establish a drug effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7295430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72954302020-06-19 Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study Moore, Thomas J Heyward, James Anderson, Gerard Alexander, G Caleb BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVES: Little is routinely disclosed about the costs of the pivotal clinical trials that provide the key scientific evidence of the treatment benefits of new therapeutic agents. We expand our earlier research to examine why the estimated costs may vary 100-fold. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the estimated costs of the pivotal clinical trials supporting the approval of 101 new therapeutic agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2017. METHODS: We licensed a software tool used by the pharmaceutical industry to estimate the likely costs of clinical trials to be conducted by contract research organisations. For each trial we collected 52 study characteristics. Linear regression was used to assess the most important factors affecting costs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean and 95% CI of 225 pivotal clinical trials using varying assumptions. We also assessed median estimated costs per patient, per clinic visit and per drug. RESULTS: Measured as pivotal trials cost per approved drug, the 101 new molecular entities had an estimated median cost of US$48 million (IQR US$20 million–US$102 million). The 225 individual clinical trials had a median estimate of US$19 million (IQR US$12 million–US$33 million) per trial and US$41 413 (IQR, US$29 894–US$75 047) per patient. The largest single factor driving cost was the number of patients required to establish the treatment effects and varied from 4 patients to 8442. Next was the number of trial clinic visits, which ranged from 2 to 166. Our statistical model showed trial costs rose exponentially with these two variables (R(2)=0.696, F=257.9, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated costs are modest for measuring the benefits of new therapeutic agents but rise exponentially as more patients and clinic visits are required to establish a drug effect. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7295430/ /pubmed/32532786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Moore, Thomas J
Heyward, James
Anderson, Gerard
Alexander, G Caleb
Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
title Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
title_full Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
title_short Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
title_sort variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the us approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
topic Pharmacology and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863
work_keys_str_mv AT moorethomasj variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy
AT heywardjames variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy
AT andersongerard variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy
AT alexandergcaleb variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy