Cargando…
Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: Little is routinely disclosed about the costs of the pivotal clinical trials that provide the key scientific evidence of the treatment benefits of new therapeutic agents. We expand our earlier research to examine why the estimated costs may vary 100-fold. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863 |
_version_ | 1783546644476723200 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Thomas J Heyward, James Anderson, Gerard Alexander, G Caleb |
author_facet | Moore, Thomas J Heyward, James Anderson, Gerard Alexander, G Caleb |
author_sort | Moore, Thomas J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Little is routinely disclosed about the costs of the pivotal clinical trials that provide the key scientific evidence of the treatment benefits of new therapeutic agents. We expand our earlier research to examine why the estimated costs may vary 100-fold. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the estimated costs of the pivotal clinical trials supporting the approval of 101 new therapeutic agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2017. METHODS: We licensed a software tool used by the pharmaceutical industry to estimate the likely costs of clinical trials to be conducted by contract research organisations. For each trial we collected 52 study characteristics. Linear regression was used to assess the most important factors affecting costs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean and 95% CI of 225 pivotal clinical trials using varying assumptions. We also assessed median estimated costs per patient, per clinic visit and per drug. RESULTS: Measured as pivotal trials cost per approved drug, the 101 new molecular entities had an estimated median cost of US$48 million (IQR US$20 million–US$102 million). The 225 individual clinical trials had a median estimate of US$19 million (IQR US$12 million–US$33 million) per trial and US$41 413 (IQR, US$29 894–US$75 047) per patient. The largest single factor driving cost was the number of patients required to establish the treatment effects and varied from 4 patients to 8442. Next was the number of trial clinic visits, which ranged from 2 to 166. Our statistical model showed trial costs rose exponentially with these two variables (R(2)=0.696, F=257.9, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated costs are modest for measuring the benefits of new therapeutic agents but rise exponentially as more patients and clinic visits are required to establish a drug effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72954302020-06-19 Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study Moore, Thomas J Heyward, James Anderson, Gerard Alexander, G Caleb BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVES: Little is routinely disclosed about the costs of the pivotal clinical trials that provide the key scientific evidence of the treatment benefits of new therapeutic agents. We expand our earlier research to examine why the estimated costs may vary 100-fold. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of the estimated costs of the pivotal clinical trials supporting the approval of 101 new therapeutic agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2017. METHODS: We licensed a software tool used by the pharmaceutical industry to estimate the likely costs of clinical trials to be conducted by contract research organisations. For each trial we collected 52 study characteristics. Linear regression was used to assess the most important factors affecting costs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean and 95% CI of 225 pivotal clinical trials using varying assumptions. We also assessed median estimated costs per patient, per clinic visit and per drug. RESULTS: Measured as pivotal trials cost per approved drug, the 101 new molecular entities had an estimated median cost of US$48 million (IQR US$20 million–US$102 million). The 225 individual clinical trials had a median estimate of US$19 million (IQR US$12 million–US$33 million) per trial and US$41 413 (IQR, US$29 894–US$75 047) per patient. The largest single factor driving cost was the number of patients required to establish the treatment effects and varied from 4 patients to 8442. Next was the number of trial clinic visits, which ranged from 2 to 166. Our statistical model showed trial costs rose exponentially with these two variables (R(2)=0.696, F=257.9, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated costs are modest for measuring the benefits of new therapeutic agents but rise exponentially as more patients and clinic visits are required to establish a drug effect. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7295430/ /pubmed/32532786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology and Therapeutics Moore, Thomas J Heyward, James Anderson, Gerard Alexander, G Caleb Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
title | Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the us approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Pharmacology and Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32532786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorethomasj variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy AT heywardjames variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy AT andersongerard variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy AT alexandergcaleb variationintheestimatedcostsofpivotalclinicalbenefittrialssupportingtheusapprovalofnewtherapeuticagents20152017acrosssectionalstudy |